More equitable scheduling idea

This forum is for Football related topics only. Other topics will be moved to the appropriate forum.
rAggie
Posts: 1044
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:52 am
Location: Logan, UT
Has thanked: 73 times
Been thanked: 961 times
Contact:

More equitable scheduling idea

Post by rAggie » October 14th, 2021, 2:56 pm

There's no doubt there is an imbalance in the way the MW cross division schedules work.

Boise playing Nevada, San Diego and Fresno while Utah State gets San Jose, UNLV, and Hawaii is sure great for us this year, but is very unbalanced.

An argument could be made that not in every year will USU get the three worst of the west and Boise will get the three best, but I wonder if there is a way to mix it up more and reduce the odds, and yes, a lot of this has to come because HISTORICALY UNLV, Hawaii, and San Jose have been on average weaker than Fresno, SDSU, and Nevada.

So I propose this alteration to MW scheduling: If you finish top three in your division, then the next season you play the 2, 4, 6 teams from the west. If you finish bottom three in the division then the next year you play 1, 3, 5. Removing last year as an outlier because of Covid, here is what recent cross-division schedules would look like for USU:

2020: (Top 3 in 19) - SDSU, SJSU, UNLV
2019: (Top 3 in 18) - Nevada, SDSU, SJSU
2018: (Bottom 3 in 17) Fresno, UNLV, Hawaii
2017: (Bottom 3 in 16) - SDSU, SJSU, UNLV

Frequency of seeing each team over 4 year period:

SDSU: 3
UNLV: 3
SJSU: 3
Nevada: 1
Hawaii: 1
Fresno: 1

Pro: More diversity in quality of opponent. Not arbitrarily locked into the same three schools home and home for two years and then the other two. New rivalries could be developed/fostered.
Cons: Not guaranteed one road trip to each west school once every 4 years.

Thoughts?


Showing my True Colors since 2022

rAggie
Posts: 1044
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:52 am
Location: Logan, UT
Has thanked: 73 times
Been thanked: 961 times
Contact:

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by rAggie » October 14th, 2021, 3:04 pm

I just realized this doesn't work because it only considers the standings one directionally. i.e. the top three in the Mountain get 2, 4, and 6, that means the 2, 4, and 6 in the West get 1, 2, 3 in the Mountain.


Showing my True Colors since 2022

rAggie
Posts: 1044
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:52 am
Location: Logan, UT
Has thanked: 73 times
Been thanked: 961 times
Contact:

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by rAggie » October 14th, 2021, 3:05 pm

So maybe it should be: 1, 3, 5 in a division get 1, 3, 5 in the opposite division, and 2, 4, 6 the same.

In this scenario, here is who we play (year is based on previous year's schedule):

2020: (Third place): Hawaii, Nevada, Fresno
2019: (Second place): Nevada, SDSU, SJSU
2018: (Fifth): Fresno, UNLV, Hawaii
2017: (Sixth): Hawaii, Nevada, Fresno

Frequency:
Hawaii: 3
Nevada: 3
Fresno: 3
SDSU: 1
SJSU: 1
UNLV: 1


Showing my True Colors since 2022

NVAggie
SJSU Ultimate Loser Award Winner - Given to someone that should probably give up but won't.
Posts: 23472
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:09 am
Location: Where the sagebrush grows!
Has thanked: 1417 times
Been thanked: 3233 times

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by NVAggie » October 14th, 2021, 3:57 pm

Seems like a really complicated way to fix a problem that doesn't exist.
These users thanked the author NVAggie for the post:
AggieFBObsession



rAggie
Posts: 1044
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:52 am
Location: Logan, UT
Has thanked: 73 times
Been thanked: 961 times
Contact:

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by rAggie » October 14th, 2021, 5:56 pm

You'll think it's a problem that doesn't exist until Boise makes it a problem if they miss out on the MWCG because they played three substantially more difficult teams than whoever wins the Mountain division did (hopefully USU).


Image


Showing my True Colors since 2022

NVAggie
SJSU Ultimate Loser Award Winner - Given to someone that should probably give up but won't.
Posts: 23472
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:09 am
Location: Where the sagebrush grows!
Has thanked: 1417 times
Been thanked: 3233 times

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by NVAggie » October 14th, 2021, 6:31 pm

It already happened in 2013 or 2014 when we played Fresno. I don’t recall a bunch of complaining back then.



User avatar
USU78
Pick'em Champ - '16 Weekly
Posts: 15412
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:43 am
Location: Sandy
Has thanked: 7169 times
Been thanked: 2087 times

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by USU78 » October 14th, 2021, 6:37 pm

The boazybunch whined and griped and groused because we stole what they see as solely and only theirs


You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

YoungBloodAggie
Posts: 3386
Joined: October 1st, 2013, 9:11 am
Has thanked: 180 times
Been thanked: 1221 times

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by YoungBloodAggie » October 14th, 2021, 7:40 pm

Over the four/five-year career of a football player, it will all balance out. There are worse arrangements for cross-divisional scheduling in college football (hello, SEC!), and I don't really think this is something that needs to be remedied.


Jordan Nathan’s ACTUAL #1 Fan

User avatar
Sl7vk
Posts: 2681
Joined: November 18th, 2018, 9:07 pm
Location: Holladay Utah
Has thanked: 817 times
Been thanked: 1847 times

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by Sl7vk » October 14th, 2021, 8:14 pm

Wait, I’m supposed to feel bad for Boise…. This year?!??

No.
No…..

Not now not ever.
These users thanked the author Sl7vk for the post:
AggieFBObsession



GameFAQSAggie
Posts: 9137
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:10 am
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 2779 times

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by GameFAQSAggie » October 14th, 2021, 10:54 pm

The schedule balances out with us getting our turn to play and miss the teams Boise has to miss and play this year. For recruiting, we need the certainty of telling kids that we WILL play in San Diego, Fresno, and Hawaii once. Not that we may depending on the standings.



User avatar
BigBlueDart
Pick'em Champ - '17 FB Predict the Score
Posts: 9116
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 7:57 am
Location: Syracuse, UT
Has thanked: 254 times
Been thanked: 1054 times

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by BigBlueDart » October 15th, 2021, 9:29 am

Indeed. I always thought it was interesting that Boise and we play opposite cross-division schedules. We never play the same Western teams. I think they should just reshuffle after every four year cycle.
These users thanked the author BigBlueDart for the post:
AGinNEIowa



nvspuds
Posts: 1936
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 6:32 pm
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 1366 times

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by nvspuds » October 15th, 2021, 9:41 pm

The Divisions may be gone as soon as next season..
These users thanked the author nvspuds for the post:
AGinNEIowa



User avatar
JSHarvey
Posts: 2246
Joined: April 2nd, 2013, 12:45 pm
Location: Sandy, UT
Has thanked: 3532 times
Been thanked: 352 times

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by JSHarvey » October 16th, 2021, 1:37 pm

Scheduling is done multiple years out, it is not feasible to switch teams every year.


"The purpose of education is not to validate ignorance but to overcome it." Lawrence Krauss

"Thinking is the hardest work there is, that's why so few people do it!" Henry Ford

User avatar
AggieFBObsession
Posts: 3191
Joined: January 25th, 2011, 12:15 pm
Has thanked: 6743 times
Been thanked: 1226 times

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by AggieFBObsession » October 16th, 2021, 1:58 pm

Why is so much attention given to this? Utah State hasn't won a MWC championship. Therefore, Utah State should feel guilty for having its schedule?

You want to shut the Bozo State fans up? Beat them on the football field. Otherwise when they whine and cry, ignore them. That's what they deserve.



User avatar
LoveMyAggies
Posts: 772
Joined: December 7th, 2013, 11:49 pm
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 216 times

More equitable scheduling idea

Post by LoveMyAggies » October 16th, 2021, 9:30 pm

Sl7vk wrote:Wait, I’m supposed to feel bad for Boise…. This year?!??

No.
No…..

Not now not ever.
I agree Boise Bozos can go pound salt, if they dont think the schedule is fair
Image
Attachments
Adjustments.jpg



User avatar
DreadPirateRoberts
Posts: 198
Joined: August 4th, 2019, 3:03 pm
Has thanked: 149 times
Been thanked: 116 times

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by DreadPirateRoberts » October 16th, 2021, 10:44 pm

Boise just lost to Air Force. So, this conversation about their schedule being fair really doesn't matter anymore.


The Dread Pirate Roberts leaves no survivors.

User avatar
Sl7vk
Posts: 2681
Joined: November 18th, 2018, 9:07 pm
Location: Holladay Utah
Has thanked: 817 times
Been thanked: 1847 times

Re: More equitable scheduling idea

Post by Sl7vk » October 16th, 2021, 10:47 pm

Yeah this did not age well.



Locked Previous topicNext topic