Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
More equitable scheduling idea
-
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:52 am
- Location: Logan, UT
- Has thanked: 73 times
- Been thanked: 961 times
- Contact:
More equitable scheduling idea
There's no doubt there is an imbalance in the way the MW cross division schedules work.
Boise playing Nevada, San Diego and Fresno while Utah State gets San Jose, UNLV, and Hawaii is sure great for us this year, but is very unbalanced.
An argument could be made that not in every year will USU get the three worst of the west and Boise will get the three best, but I wonder if there is a way to mix it up more and reduce the odds, and yes, a lot of this has to come because HISTORICALY UNLV, Hawaii, and San Jose have been on average weaker than Fresno, SDSU, and Nevada.
So I propose this alteration to MW scheduling: If you finish top three in your division, then the next season you play the 2, 4, 6 teams from the west. If you finish bottom three in the division then the next year you play 1, 3, 5. Removing last year as an outlier because of Covid, here is what recent cross-division schedules would look like for USU:
2020: (Top 3 in 19) - SDSU, SJSU, UNLV
2019: (Top 3 in 18) - Nevada, SDSU, SJSU
2018: (Bottom 3 in 17) Fresno, UNLV, Hawaii
2017: (Bottom 3 in 16) - SDSU, SJSU, UNLV
Frequency of seeing each team over 4 year period:
SDSU: 3
UNLV: 3
SJSU: 3
Nevada: 1
Hawaii: 1
Fresno: 1
Pro: More diversity in quality of opponent. Not arbitrarily locked into the same three schools home and home for two years and then the other two. New rivalries could be developed/fostered.
Cons: Not guaranteed one road trip to each west school once every 4 years.
Thoughts?
Boise playing Nevada, San Diego and Fresno while Utah State gets San Jose, UNLV, and Hawaii is sure great for us this year, but is very unbalanced.
An argument could be made that not in every year will USU get the three worst of the west and Boise will get the three best, but I wonder if there is a way to mix it up more and reduce the odds, and yes, a lot of this has to come because HISTORICALY UNLV, Hawaii, and San Jose have been on average weaker than Fresno, SDSU, and Nevada.
So I propose this alteration to MW scheduling: If you finish top three in your division, then the next season you play the 2, 4, 6 teams from the west. If you finish bottom three in the division then the next year you play 1, 3, 5. Removing last year as an outlier because of Covid, here is what recent cross-division schedules would look like for USU:
2020: (Top 3 in 19) - SDSU, SJSU, UNLV
2019: (Top 3 in 18) - Nevada, SDSU, SJSU
2018: (Bottom 3 in 17) Fresno, UNLV, Hawaii
2017: (Bottom 3 in 16) - SDSU, SJSU, UNLV
Frequency of seeing each team over 4 year period:
SDSU: 3
UNLV: 3
SJSU: 3
Nevada: 1
Hawaii: 1
Fresno: 1
Pro: More diversity in quality of opponent. Not arbitrarily locked into the same three schools home and home for two years and then the other two. New rivalries could be developed/fostered.
Cons: Not guaranteed one road trip to each west school once every 4 years.
Thoughts?
Showing my True Colors since 2022
-
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:52 am
- Location: Logan, UT
- Has thanked: 73 times
- Been thanked: 961 times
- Contact:
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
I just realized this doesn't work because it only considers the standings one directionally. i.e. the top three in the Mountain get 2, 4, and 6, that means the 2, 4, and 6 in the West get 1, 2, 3 in the Mountain.
Showing my True Colors since 2022
-
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:52 am
- Location: Logan, UT
- Has thanked: 73 times
- Been thanked: 961 times
- Contact:
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
So maybe it should be: 1, 3, 5 in a division get 1, 3, 5 in the opposite division, and 2, 4, 6 the same.
In this scenario, here is who we play (year is based on previous year's schedule):
2020: (Third place): Hawaii, Nevada, Fresno
2019: (Second place): Nevada, SDSU, SJSU
2018: (Fifth): Fresno, UNLV, Hawaii
2017: (Sixth): Hawaii, Nevada, Fresno
Frequency:
Hawaii: 3
Nevada: 3
Fresno: 3
SDSU: 1
SJSU: 1
UNLV: 1
In this scenario, here is who we play (year is based on previous year's schedule):
2020: (Third place): Hawaii, Nevada, Fresno
2019: (Second place): Nevada, SDSU, SJSU
2018: (Fifth): Fresno, UNLV, Hawaii
2017: (Sixth): Hawaii, Nevada, Fresno
Frequency:
Hawaii: 3
Nevada: 3
Fresno: 3
SDSU: 1
SJSU: 1
UNLV: 1
Showing my True Colors since 2022
-
- SJSU Ultimate Loser Award Winner - Given to someone that should probably give up but won't.
- Posts: 23472
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:09 am
- Location: Where the sagebrush grows!
- Has thanked: 1417 times
- Been thanked: 3233 times
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
Seems like a really complicated way to fix a problem that doesn't exist.
- These users thanked the author NVAggie for the post:
- AggieFBObsession
-
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:52 am
- Location: Logan, UT
- Has thanked: 73 times
- Been thanked: 961 times
- Contact:
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
You'll think it's a problem that doesn't exist until Boise makes it a problem if they miss out on the MWCG because they played three substantially more difficult teams than whoever wins the Mountain division did (hopefully USU).
Showing my True Colors since 2022
-
- SJSU Ultimate Loser Award Winner - Given to someone that should probably give up but won't.
- Posts: 23472
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:09 am
- Location: Where the sagebrush grows!
- Has thanked: 1417 times
- Been thanked: 3233 times
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
It already happened in 2013 or 2014 when we played Fresno. I don’t recall a bunch of complaining back then.
- USU78
- Pick'em Champ - '16 Weekly
- Posts: 15412
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:43 am
- Location: Sandy
- Has thanked: 7169 times
- Been thanked: 2087 times
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
The boazybunch whined and griped and groused because we stole what they see as solely and only theirs
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
-
- Posts: 3386
- Joined: October 1st, 2013, 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 180 times
- Been thanked: 1221 times
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
Over the four/five-year career of a football player, it will all balance out. There are worse arrangements for cross-divisional scheduling in college football (hello, SEC!), and I don't really think this is something that needs to be remedied.
Jordan Nathan’s ACTUAL #1 Fan
- Sl7vk
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: November 18th, 2018, 9:07 pm
- Location: Holladay Utah
- Has thanked: 817 times
- Been thanked: 1847 times
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
Wait, I’m supposed to feel bad for Boise…. This year?!??
No.
No…..
Not now not ever.
No.
No…..
Not now not ever.
- These users thanked the author Sl7vk for the post:
- AggieFBObsession
-
- Posts: 9137
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:10 am
- Has thanked: 310 times
- Been thanked: 2779 times
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
The schedule balances out with us getting our turn to play and miss the teams Boise has to miss and play this year. For recruiting, we need the certainty of telling kids that we WILL play in San Diego, Fresno, and Hawaii once. Not that we may depending on the standings.
- BigBlueDart
- Pick'em Champ - '17 FB Predict the Score
- Posts: 9116
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 7:57 am
- Location: Syracuse, UT
- Has thanked: 254 times
- Been thanked: 1054 times
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
Indeed. I always thought it was interesting that Boise and we play opposite cross-division schedules. We never play the same Western teams. I think they should just reshuffle after every four year cycle.
- These users thanked the author BigBlueDart for the post:
- AGinNEIowa
-
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: November 17th, 2010, 6:32 pm
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 1366 times
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
The Divisions may be gone as soon as next season..
- These users thanked the author nvspuds for the post:
- AGinNEIowa
- JSHarvey
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: April 2nd, 2013, 12:45 pm
- Location: Sandy, UT
- Has thanked: 3532 times
- Been thanked: 352 times
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
Scheduling is done multiple years out, it is not feasible to switch teams every year.
"The purpose of education is not to validate ignorance but to overcome it." Lawrence Krauss
"Thinking is the hardest work there is, that's why so few people do it!" Henry Ford
"Thinking is the hardest work there is, that's why so few people do it!" Henry Ford
- AggieFBObsession
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: January 25th, 2011, 12:15 pm
- Has thanked: 6743 times
- Been thanked: 1226 times
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
Why is so much attention given to this? Utah State hasn't won a MWC championship. Therefore, Utah State should feel guilty for having its schedule?
You want to shut the Bozo State fans up? Beat them on the football field. Otherwise when they whine and cry, ignore them. That's what they deserve.
You want to shut the Bozo State fans up? Beat them on the football field. Otherwise when they whine and cry, ignore them. That's what they deserve.
- LoveMyAggies
- Posts: 772
- Joined: December 7th, 2013, 11:49 pm
- Has thanked: 94 times
- Been thanked: 216 times
More equitable scheduling idea
I agree Boise Bozos can go pound salt, if they dont think the schedule is fairSl7vk wrote:Wait, I’m supposed to feel bad for Boise…. This year?!??
No.
No…..
Not now not ever.
- DreadPirateRoberts
- Posts: 198
- Joined: August 4th, 2019, 3:03 pm
- Has thanked: 149 times
- Been thanked: 116 times
Re: More equitable scheduling idea
Boise just lost to Air Force. So, this conversation about their schedule being fair really doesn't matter anymore.
The Dread Pirate Roberts leaves no survivors.
- Sl7vk
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: November 18th, 2018, 9:07 pm
- Location: Holladay Utah
- Has thanked: 817 times
- Been thanked: 1847 times