Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
"New" column about the football program
- NowhereLandAggie
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: November 8th, 2010, 4:25 pm
- Has thanked: 502 times
- Been thanked: 572 times
"New" column about the football program
https://www.sltrib.com/sports/utah-stat ... tah-state/
Nothing breaking here, just a daily dose of hearsay against Noelle Cockett.
I would swear under oath though that I never had any encounter with her where she said or demonstrated any type of prejudice.
If that means that Gordon Monson believes I am not refined enough as individual, I can live with that.
Nothing breaking here, just a daily dose of hearsay against Noelle Cockett.
I would swear under oath though that I never had any encounter with her where she said or demonstrated any type of prejudice.
If that means that Gordon Monson believes I am not refined enough as individual, I can live with that.
- These users thanked the author NowhereLandAggie for the post:
- JSHarvey
-
- Posts: 14039
- Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
- Has thanked: 917 times
- Been thanked: 1907 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
“Cockett asked the players if they felt Maile’s religious and cultural background would impact the University’s future recruiting. Players were then asked about their own religious backgrounds and perceptions coming to USU.”
Hasn’t this been what pro-maile people have been saying? That we need a Polynesian Mormon connection? But now it’s grounds for burning down the program?
The more that comes out the more I believe someone is pulling significant political strings.
Hasn’t this been what pro-maile people have been saying? That we need a Polynesian Mormon connection? But now it’s grounds for burning down the program?
The more that comes out the more I believe someone is pulling significant political strings.
- These users thanked the author Imakeitrain for the post:
- JSHarvey
- GeoAg
- Moderator
- Posts: 8595
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 1:09 am
- Has thanked: 299 times
- Been thanked: 1725 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
There is no one behind the curtain on this, just very poor judgement by Cockett and Hartwell. If there was a bias issue, I am glad this is happening to uncover it. If there isn't, she should still be in trouble for saying something that allowed the perception to exist.
"You guys have sacrificed in ways you've never sacrificed before. You've given more. You expect more...Tonight is our opportunity to write the story of who this family, who this program, who this team will be" -Coach Blake Anderson
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: November 12th, 2020, 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
BRING OUT YOUR DEAD!GeoAg wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 2:36 pmThere is no one behind the curtain on this, just very poor judgement by Cockett and Hartwell. If there was a bias issue, I am glad this is happening to uncover it. If there isn't, she should still be in trouble for saying something that allowed the perception to exist.
- USU78
- Pick'em Champ - '16 Weekly
- Posts: 15398
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:43 am
- Location: Sandy
- Has thanked: 7167 times
- Been thanked: 2086 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
So nobody is ever responsible for flying off the handle because he is ignorant or misperceived or doesn't even know what he doesn't know?GeoAg wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 2:36 pmThere is no one behind the curtain on this, just very poor judgement by Cockett and Hartwell. If there was a bias issue, I am glad this is happening to uncover it. If there isn't, she should still be in trouble for saying something that allowed the perception to exist.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
- brownjeans
- Flatulent
- Posts: 18612
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 951 times
- Been thanked: 1739 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
We should stop saying this. Neither our program or our school is burning.
The program and school are more than a player, coach, president. People come and go, programs and schools carry on.
-
- Posts: 8040
- Joined: October 22nd, 2016, 1:06 am
- Has thanked: 2298 times
- Been thanked: 2577 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
It is a metaphor for how bad things have gotten. It doesn't mean it will never be good again. We are in a low point right now. Pretty crazy to think we had a 10 game winning streak just two years ago.brownjeans wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 3:57 pmWe should stop saying this. Neither our program or our school is burning.
The program and school are more than a player, coach, president. People come and go, programs and schools carry on.
- brownjeans
- Flatulent
- Posts: 18612
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 951 times
- Been thanked: 1739 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
We've been way lower than this. Even with this, our program is in a good place overall.Aggie formerly in Hawaii wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 5:00 pmIt is a metaphor for how bad things have gotten. It doesn't mean it will never be good again. We are in a low point right now. Pretty crazy to think we had a 10 game winning streak just two years ago.brownjeans wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 3:57 pmWe should stop saying this. Neither our program or our school is burning.
The program and school are more than a player, coach, president. People come and go, programs and schools carry on.
-
- Posts: 8040
- Joined: October 22nd, 2016, 1:06 am
- Has thanked: 2298 times
- Been thanked: 2577 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
Sure we've been lower, but we are pretty low. Yes we can turn it around, but it will take some time.brownjeans wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 5:26 pmWe've been way lower than this. Even with this, our program is in a good place overall.Aggie formerly in Hawaii wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 5:00 pmIt is a metaphor for how bad things have gotten. It doesn't mean it will never be good again. We are in a low point right now. Pretty crazy to think we had a 10 game winning streak just two years ago.brownjeans wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 3:57 pmWe should stop saying this. Neither our program or our school is burning.
The program and school are more than a player, coach, president. People come and go, programs and schools carry on.
- ViAggie
- Posts: 24807
- Joined: June 16th, 2011, 6:49 pm
- Location: Temecula, California
- Has thanked: 6112 times
- Been thanked: 2560 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
unless she has a history of racism and religious discrimination, I say chalk it up to a oooopsie and call it good.
- These users thanked the author ViAggie for the post (total 3):
- flying_scotsman2.0 • JSHarvey • 3rdGenAggie
Just another day in the (Aggie) Brotherhood
- NowhereLandAggie
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: November 8th, 2010, 4:25 pm
- Has thanked: 502 times
- Been thanked: 572 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
I am not a lawyer, but I was an employee of USU and a public employee the same.GeoAg wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 2:36 pmThere is no one behind the curtain on this, just very poor judgement by Cockett and Hartwell. If there was a bias issue, I am glad this is happening to uncover it. If there isn't, she should still be in trouble for saying something that allowed the perception to exist.
A whole process is taking place and they will have to prove that discrimination took place in not hiring him in order for her to lose her job. If her alleged comments were part of a larger context not being reported (both she and Hartwell have been largely quiet on this, wisely I might add) then they can't simply dismiss her. Otherwise the Board of Regents would be putting themselves in a position of litigation. Also they would need to find a pattern of this within her role at the University since that is also an allegation. Plenty of people are saying the same thing that I am, we never had that experience with her.
I hate to break this to Frank, but people lose jobs at USU all of the time for a variety of reasons. If they have documented in his file why he has been let go, that holds more away than a private conversation where accounts differ a bit.
- These users thanked the author NowhereLandAggie for the post:
- JSHarvey
-
- Posts: 8040
- Joined: October 22nd, 2016, 1:06 am
- Has thanked: 2298 times
- Been thanked: 2577 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
That is what I have thought of it. She probably misspoke and said something dumb, but I doubt she is some anti-Mormon bigot and racist against Polynesians. We'll see what the results of the investigation are, but it was probably a misunderstanding.
- These users thanked the author Aggie formerly in Hawaii for the post:
- ViAggie
-
- Posts: 8040
- Joined: October 22nd, 2016, 1:06 am
- Has thanked: 2298 times
- Been thanked: 2577 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
And he didn't lose a job. Nothing was promised to him beyond this year.NowhereLandAggie wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 6:09 pmI am not a lawyer, but I was an employee of USU and a public employee the same.GeoAg wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 2:36 pmThere is no one behind the curtain on this, just very poor judgement by Cockett and Hartwell. If there was a bias issue, I am glad this is happening to uncover it. If there isn't, she should still be in trouble for saying something that allowed the perception to exist.
A whole process is taking place and they will have to prove that discrimination took place in not hiring him in order for her to lose her job. If her alleged comments were part of a larger context not being reported (both she and Hartwell have been largely quiet on this, wisely I might add) then they can't simply dismiss her. Otherwise the Board of Regents would be putting themselves in a position of litigation. Also they would need to find a pattern of this within her role at the University since that is also an allegation. Plenty of people are saying the same thing that I am, we never had that experience with her.
I hate to break this to Frank, but people lose jobs at USU all of the time for a variety of reasons. If they have documented in his file why he has been let go, that holds more away than a private conversation where accounts differ a bit.
-
- Posts: 14039
- Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
- Has thanked: 917 times
- Been thanked: 1907 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
I disagree. I think pushing these stories is intentionally designed to harm the program.brownjeans wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 3:57 pmWe should stop saying this. Neither our program or our school is burning.
The program and school are more than a player, coach, president. People come and go, programs and schools carry on.
- These users thanked the author Imakeitrain for the post (total 3):
- JSHarvey • USU78 • tjensen_25
-
- Posts: 14039
- Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
- Has thanked: 917 times
- Been thanked: 1907 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
So now Hartwell said something racist anti-Mormon too?GeoAg wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 2:36 pmThere is no one behind the curtain on this, just very poor judgement by Cockett and Hartwell. If there was a bias issue, I am glad this is happening to uncover it. If there isn't, she should still be in trouble for saying something that allowed the perception to exist.
This article essentially says that the smoking gun is cockett asking the players if they thought maile’s background is relevant and for wanting to listen to their experiences.
No one has given a specific quote and in some instances reporters inadvertently highlight that recollections of the event are different.
Lastly there appears to have been coordination.
No, I don’t believe players just decided not to play the last game without a coach catching any wind of it.
So forgive me for being extremely skeptical.
The answer to skepticism is answers and information. It’s Maile’s camp that is restricting information.
- These users thanked the author Imakeitrain for the post:
- JSHarvey
-
- Posts: 357
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:58 pm
- Location: 2601 Miles Southeast of the Center of the Universe
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 70 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
I have no idea what happened, but will trust the process. Dr. Cockett is an excellent President (in my opinion) and I reached out to express my appreciation in general terms. I also made an extra contribution to the University.
Welcome to Utah State University: A Little Piece of Heaven on the North Side of Hell
- TheAKAggie
- DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING I SAY
- Posts: 6360
- Joined: February 3rd, 2012, 10:21 pm
- Location: Hyde Park, UT
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 592 times
- Contact:
Re: "New" column about the football program
Hell, i can’t even get interviews for positions I am qualified for.NowhereLandAggie wrote:I am not a lawyer, but I was an employee of USU and a public employee the same.GeoAg wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 2:36 pmThere is no one behind the curtain on this, just very poor judgement by Cockett and Hartwell. If there was a bias issue, I am glad this is happening to uncover it. If there isn't, she should still be in trouble for saying something that allowed the perception to exist.
A whole process is taking place and they will have to prove that discrimination took place in not hiring him in order for her to lose her job. If her alleged comments were part of a larger context not being reported (both she and Hartwell have been largely quiet on this, wisely I might add) then they can't simply dismiss her. Otherwise the Board of Regents would be putting themselves in a position of litigation. Also they would need to find a pattern of this within her role at the University since that is also an allegation. Plenty of people are saying the same thing that I am, we never had that experience with her.
I hate to break this to Frank, but people lose jobs at USU all of the time for a variety of reasons. If they have documented in his file why he has been let go, that holds more away than a private conversation where accounts differ a bit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hail Aggies!
- brownjeans
- Flatulent
- Posts: 18612
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 951 times
- Been thanked: 1739 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
I said nothing about the stories.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 9:01 pmI disagree. I think pushing these stories is intentionally designed to harm the program.brownjeans wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 3:57 pmWe should stop saying this. Neither our program or our school is burning.
The program and school are more than a player, coach, president. People come and go, programs and schools carry on.
Phrases like "burning down the program" are exaggerated, and damaging in and of themselves. If you are concerned about the health of the program, maybe consider giving the stories less power, not more.
-
- Posts: 14039
- Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
- Has thanked: 917 times
- Been thanked: 1907 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
I'd often agree with that statement. But in this case I stand by my words.brownjeans wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 10:30 pmI said nothing about the stories.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 9:01 pmI disagree. I think pushing these stories is intentionally designed to harm the program.brownjeans wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 3:57 pmWe should stop saying this. Neither our program or our school is burning.
The program and school are more than a player, coach, president. People come and go, programs and schools carry on.
Phrases like "burning down the program" are exaggerated, and damaging in and of themselves. If you are concerned about the health of the program, maybe consider giving the stories less power, not more.
I find the claim that there is racism/prejudice to the point of it guiding hiring decisions to be a serious claim- to the point of being incendiary.
Racism is an extremely serious claim. In some ways "racist" is short of rapist and murderer in seriousness- (and for some, it's viewed as worse)
So I think the claim is serious enough my response is not exaggerated.
- WAAggie
- Posts: 3405
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:02 am
- Location: Kent WA
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 517 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
Without facts, it’s uncalled for at this
Point. How about some presumption of innocence? The players seem like they approach a lynch mob mentality trying to keep a nice/fun guy, but lousy coach.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Point. How about some presumption of innocence? The players seem like they approach a lynch mob mentality trying to keep a nice/fun guy, but lousy coach.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- brownjeans
- Flatulent
- Posts: 18612
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 951 times
- Been thanked: 1739 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
Let me see if I can illustrate how I think words like that increase the damage.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑December 27th, 2020, 12:00 amI'd often agree with that statement. But in this case I stand by my words.
I find the claim that there is racism/prejudice to the point of it guiding hiring decisions to be a serious claim- to the point of being incendiary.
Racism is an extremely serious claim. In some ways "racist" is short of rapist and murderer in seriousness- (and for some, it's viewed as worse)
So I think the claim is serious enough my response is not exaggerated.
Two identical homes have renters who trash the place. Both homes sustain equal damage.
The first homeowner is angry at the past renters and wants to stick it to them. He says, "my home is in shambles! They ruined it!"
The second homeowner is also angry, but focused on future renters. He says, "my home is a great home.The damage was superficial. I've got the best people working to repair the damage. We're using this as an opportunity to make the home even better."
Which do you want to rent? Maybe it doesn't matter - this is a message board. But maybe it does. I don't know.
I agree the racist claims are incendiary, and may cause irreparable harm to Cockett. But USU is not Cockett. It's a really great program and school.
-
- Posts: 14039
- Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
- Has thanked: 917 times
- Been thanked: 1907 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
But what if the second tenants are going around telling everyone the owner is racist?brownjeans wrote: ↑December 27th, 2020, 8:31 amLet me see if I can illustrate how I think words like that increase the damage.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑December 27th, 2020, 12:00 amI'd often agree with that statement. But in this case I stand by my words.
I find the claim that there is racism/prejudice to the point of it guiding hiring decisions to be a serious claim- to the point of being incendiary.
Racism is an extremely serious claim. In some ways "racist" is short of rapist and murderer in seriousness- (and for some, it's viewed as worse)
So I think the claim is serious enough my response is not exaggerated.
Two identical homes have renters who trash the place. Both homes sustain equal damage.
The first homeowner is angry at the past renters and wants to stick it to them. He says, "my home is in shambles! They ruined it!"
The second homeowner is also angry, but focused on future renters. He says, "my home is a great home.The damage was superficial. I've got the best people working to repair the damage. We're using this as an opportunity to make the home even better."
Which do you want to rent? Maybe it doesn't matter - this is a message board. But maybe it does. I don't know.
I agree the racist claims are incendiary, and may cause irreparable harm to Cockett. But USU is not Cockett. It's a really great program and school.
And regardless of how well it’s fixed up- no one wants to rent from you. Also they’re getting ready to sue you?
- USU78
- Pick'em Champ - '16 Weekly
- Posts: 15398
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:43 am
- Location: Sandy
- Has thanked: 7167 times
- Been thanked: 2086 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
"Never waste your time trying to explain who you are to people who are committed to misunderstanding you."
- These users thanked the author USU78 for the post (total 2):
- brownjeans • El Sapo
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
- El Sapo
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: November 27th, 2017, 1:32 pm
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 699 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
I'm glad the Monson column was brought up for discussion. When I first read it I was disturbed. It seemed to me like Monson was arguing a narrative that wasn't part of the incident. But, Monson has the media megaphone for his narrative.
I had to read it again closely. Then you see that It's not a false narrative, Monson is parroting an opinion of the "leaders of the Utah Pacific Islander community.."
So make sure you read his column in that perspective. The opinion of a non-objective third party to the situation in support of Frank.
If it seems biased against USU? That would be because it is.
I had to read it again closely. Then you see that It's not a false narrative, Monson is parroting an opinion of the "leaders of the Utah Pacific Islander community.."
So make sure you read his column in that perspective. The opinion of a non-objective third party to the situation in support of Frank.
If it seems biased against USU? That would be because it is.
- El Sapo
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: November 27th, 2017, 1:32 pm
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 699 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
Curious NowhereLandAggie, Were you required to take, or did you receive any anti-discrimination training as an employee of USU?NowhereLandAggie wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 6:09 pmI am not a lawyer, but I was an employee of USU and a public employee the same.GeoAg wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 2:36 pmThere is no one behind the curtain on this, just very poor judgement by Cockett and Hartwell. If there was a bias issue, I am glad this is happening to uncover it. If there isn't, she should still be in trouble for saying something that allowed the perception to exist.
A whole process is taking place and they will have to prove that discrimination took place in not hiring him in order for her to lose her job. If her alleged comments were part of a larger context not being reported (both she and Hartwell have been largely quiet on this, wisely I might add) then they can't simply dismiss her. Otherwise the Board of Regents would be putting themselves in a position of litigation. Also they would need to find a pattern of this within her role at the University since that is also an allegation. Plenty of people are saying the same thing that I am, we never had that experience with her.
I hate to break this to Frank, but people lose jobs at USU all of the time for a variety of reasons. If they have documented in his file why he has been let go, that holds more away than a private conversation where accounts differ a bit.
It's been common here in CA, mostly for management personnel. But maybe the last 2-3 years, employers have been requiring all the employees to get training. Good way to avoid lawsuits. Show that the company has rules and regulations in place, and they are trained to respond properly to incidents. Frank should know the regulations, maybe it's the players need training.
- ViAggie
- Posts: 24807
- Joined: June 16th, 2011, 6:49 pm
- Location: Temecula, California
- Has thanked: 6112 times
- Been thanked: 2560 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
I’m guessing this is the end result if it’s not already being done at the University.El Sapo wrote: ↑December 27th, 2020, 12:07 pmCurious NowhereLandAggie, Were you required to take, or did you receive any anti-discrimination training as an employee of USU?NowhereLandAggie wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 6:09 pmI am not a lawyer, but I was an employee of USU and a public employee the same.GeoAg wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 2:36 pmThere is no one behind the curtain on this, just very poor judgement by Cockett and Hartwell. If there was a bias issue, I am glad this is happening to uncover it. If there isn't, she should still be in trouble for saying something that allowed the perception to exist.
A whole process is taking place and they will have to prove that discrimination took place in not hiring him in order for her to lose her job. If her alleged comments were part of a larger context not being reported (both she and Hartwell have been largely quiet on this, wisely I might add) then they can't simply dismiss her. Otherwise the Board of Regents would be putting themselves in a position of litigation. Also they would need to find a pattern of this within her role at the University since that is also an allegation. Plenty of people are saying the same thing that I am, we never had that experience with her.
I hate to break this to Frank, but people lose jobs at USU all of the time for a variety of reasons. If they have documented in his file why he has been let go, that holds more away than a private conversation where accounts differ a bit.
It's been common here in CA, mostly for management personnel. But maybe the last 2-3 years, employers have been requiring all the employees to get training. Good way to avoid lawsuits. Show that the company has rules and regulations in place, and they are trained to respond properly to incidents. Frank should know the regulations, maybe it's the players need training.
Just another day in the (Aggie) Brotherhood
- NowhereLandAggie
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: November 8th, 2010, 4:25 pm
- Has thanked: 502 times
- Been thanked: 572 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
Yes. I haven't worked for USU since 2014, but it was standard training to go through Civil Rights trainings. In basic terms anyone can file a complaint if they deem you are discriminating against them. There was a number they could call for an official complaint that we were required to hang in our office. That was the final authority, though a person could call them first. Initially a supervisor could look into it, and up the chain if it was never resolved until it reached the executive branch.El Sapo wrote: ↑December 27th, 2020, 12:07 pmCurious NowhereLandAggie, Were you required to take, or did you receive any anti-discrimination training as an employee of USU?NowhereLandAggie wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 6:09 pmI am not a lawyer, but I was an employee of USU and a public employee the same.GeoAg wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 2:36 pmThere is no one behind the curtain on this, just very poor judgement by Cockett and Hartwell. If there was a bias issue, I am glad this is happening to uncover it. If there isn't, she should still be in trouble for saying something that allowed the perception to exist.
A whole process is taking place and they will have to prove that discrimination took place in not hiring him in order for her to lose her job. If her alleged comments were part of a larger context not being reported (both she and Hartwell have been largely quiet on this, wisely I might add) then they can't simply dismiss her. Otherwise the Board of Regents would be putting themselves in a position of litigation. Also they would need to find a pattern of this within her role at the University since that is also an allegation. Plenty of people are saying the same thing that I am, we never had that experience with her.
I hate to break this to Frank, but people lose jobs at USU all of the time for a variety of reasons. If they have documented in his file why he has been let go, that holds more away than a private conversation where accounts differ a bit.
It's been common here in CA, mostly for management personnel. But maybe the last 2-3 years, employers have been requiring all the employees to get training. Good way to avoid lawsuits. Show that the company has rules and regulations in place, and they are trained to respond properly to incidents. Frank should know the regulations, maybe it's the players need training.
I still have trainings every year about these and other things in my current employment, but another is also stressed. The accused also has rights, and while it is not going to sell papers, the burden of proof does not lie on them. People can accuse all day if they like, but they do have to have fairly tangible evidence for actions to be taken. I am not saying a remark can't get you fired, but in general it has to be blatant with some sort of action to constitute job loss.
I lost my job for completely separate reason, relating neither to my performance, nor any complaint filed from someone. I have a letter from Noelle Cockett, Stan Albrecht, and Ray Cowart stating the procedure they were following in the USU Faculty code. It wasn't a real fun thing, and even she wasn't certain what to do based on the circumstances that led to it. (As far as she was aware it had actually never happened before, at least in that department.)
If I wanted to be bitter about it, I could have been, but she was actually very kind and professional. It is why I don't buy the narrative as one side is telling.
- These users thanked the author NowhereLandAggie for the post:
- USU78
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: November 12th, 2020, 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Re: "New" column about the football program
Gordon monson is a washed-up journalist, working for a newspaper about to go out of business.NowhereLandAggie wrote: ↑December 26th, 2020, 12:43 pmhttps://www.sltrib.com/sports/utah-stat ... tah-state/
Nothing breaking here, just a daily dose of hearsay against Noelle Cockett.
I would swear under oath though that I never had any encounter with her where she said or demonstrated any type of prejudice.
If that means that Gordon Monson believes I am not refined enough as individual, I can live with that.