Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
Jordan Love Analysis
- ratofallaggies
- Posts: 3887
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 1:29 pm
- Location: Farmington
- Has thanked: 325 times
- Been thanked: 901 times
Re: Jordan Love Analysis
Slid a few pics but still went first round as I've said all along. That is a great situation for both JL and the Packers. I'll pat myself on the back
- These users thanked the author ratofallaggies for the post (total 3):
- Roy McAvoy • BustaMcNutt • El Sapo
- 2004AG
- Posts: 12475
- Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 808 times
- Been thanked: 1613 times
Re: Jordan Love Analysis
Is it though?ratofallaggies wrote:Slid a few pics but still went first round as I've said all along. That is a great situation for both JL and the Packers. I'll pat myself on the back
Rodgers is gonna be pissed. Rodgers isn’t the type to groom and mentor Love. He’s a red (I can't express myself without swearing).
And the packers aren’t any better for drafting love for 3 years. Love can’t help while sitting on the bench.
There were much better fits for love. Tampa and New Orleans would have been ideal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 4973
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:10 pm
- Location: Providence ,Utah
- Has thanked: 574 times
- Been thanked: 187 times
Re: Jordan Love Analysis
My exact thoughts. I was rooting for the Saints, Sitting behind Rodgers was the last thing I wanted plus it gets cold there.2004AG wrote: ↑April 24th, 2020, 9:27 amIs it though?ratofallaggies wrote:Slid a few pics but still went first round as I've said all along. That is a great situation for both JL and the Packers. I'll pat myself on the back
Rodgers is gonna be pissed. Rodgers isn’t the type to groom and mentor Love. He’s a red (I can't express myself without swearing).
And the packers aren’t any better for drafting love for 3 years. Love can’t help while sitting on the bench.
There were much better fits for love. Tampa and New Orleans would have been ideal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But hey he's a first rounder and going to a great Organization. I was starting to get worried towards the end.
Last edited by Machismo on April 24th, 2020, 10:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
- These users thanked the author Machismo for the post:
- SBC_packers
- ratofallaggies
- Posts: 3887
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 1:29 pm
- Location: Farmington
- Has thanked: 325 times
- Been thanked: 901 times
Re: Jordan Love Analysis
My comment is not based on Rodgers at all. JL shouldn't rely on Rodgers for his own success, he needs to learn and develop on his own just like Rodgers did while behind Favre. My input is based on the stability and long term vision that the Packers have and will continue to have. They have had 3 GM's in the past 20 years and their previous GM (who was there for 13 years) is still on staff as a senior consultant. Time will definitely tell, but there is something to be said to be drafted by an organization like GB that has stability and will give him all the time he needs in order to develop.2004AG wrote: ↑April 24th, 2020, 9:27 amIs it though?ratofallaggies wrote:Slid a few pics but still went first round as I've said all along. That is a great situation for both JL and the Packers. I'll pat myself on the back
Rodgers is gonna be pissed. Rodgers isn’t the type to groom and mentor Love. He’s a red (I can't express myself without swearing).
And the packers aren’t any better for drafting love for 3 years. Love can’t help while sitting on the bench.
There were much better fits for love. Tampa and New Orleans would have been ideal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author ratofallaggies for the post (total 2):
- Machismo • AggiePT
-
- Posts: 746
- Joined: August 7th, 2019, 1:41 pm
- Has thanked: 1896 times
- Been thanked: 603 times
Re: Jordan Love Analysis
I completely agree. Aaron Rodger shouldn't be expected to "groom" the younger QB. Rodgers is trying to win a Superbowl, he's not a coach. But it is completely in Love's hands to observe and absorb as much as he can in the countless hours and maybe years in the film room, QB meetings, and practice with a Hall of Fame guy. If Jordan is good enough, he will get his legitimate shot with Green Bay, or he will be like Jimmy G and be traded to a different franchise to start.ratofallaggies wrote: ↑April 24th, 2020, 10:07 amMy comment is not based on Rodgers at all. JL shouldn't rely on Rodgers for his own success, he needs to learn and develop on his own just like Rodgers did while behind Favre. My input is based on the stability and long term vision that the Packers have and will continue to have. They have had 3 GM's in the past 20 years and their previous GM (who was there for 13 years) is still on staff as a senior consultant. Time will definitely tell, but there is something to be said to be drafted by an organization like GB that has stability and will give him all the time he needs in order to develop.2004AG wrote: ↑April 24th, 2020, 9:27 amIs it though?ratofallaggies wrote:Slid a few pics but still went first round as I've said all along. That is a great situation for both JL and the Packers. I'll pat myself on the back
Rodgers is gonna be pissed. Rodgers isn’t the type to groom and mentor Love. He’s a red (I can't express myself without swearing).
And the packers aren’t any better for drafting love for 3 years. Love can’t help while sitting on the bench.
There were much better fits for love. Tampa and New Orleans would have been ideal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- 2004AG
- Posts: 12475
- Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 808 times
- Been thanked: 1613 times
Re: Jordan Love Analysis
My point is Jordan would be better served to sit behind and learn from a guy that is happy to teach and mentor Jordan. Not a guy who is is gonna give him the cold shoulder and is pissed.ratofallaggies wrote:My comment is not based on Rodgers at all. JL shouldn't rely on Rodgers for his own success, he needs to learn and develop on his own just like Rodgers did while behind Favre. My input is based on the stability and long term vision that the Packers have and will continue to have. They have had 3 GM's in the past 20 years and their previous GM (who was there for 13 years) is still on staff as a senior consultant. Time will definitely tell, but there is something to be said to be drafted by an organization like GB that has stability and will give him all the time he needs in order to develop.2004AG wrote: ↑April 24th, 2020, 9:27 amIs it though?ratofallaggies wrote:Slid a few pics but still went first round as I've said all along. That is a great situation for both JL and the Packers. I'll pat myself on the back
Rodgers is gonna be pissed. Rodgers isn’t the type to groom and mentor Love. He’s a red (I can't express myself without swearing).
And the packers aren’t any better for drafting love for 3 years. Love can’t help while sitting on the bench.
There were much better fits for love. Tampa and New Orleans would have been ideal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But sure, from a stable perspective, the packers are a great organization.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author 2004AG for the post:
- SBC_packers
- El Sapo
- Posts: 3112
- Joined: November 27th, 2017, 1:32 pm
- Has thanked: 617 times
- Been thanked: 705 times
Re: Jordan Love Analysis
The quick easy take is that the Packers wasted a pick on a developmental guy. Something that signals a re-build instead of a re-load, and Rodgers is going to be pissed. I don't buy that. This draft is DEEP with WR's, and the pack will be able to get talent at WR with either or both of their next 2 picks if they so desire. It's still a re-load as long as Rodgers is QB.
I'm gonna say that Love is a Rogers type QB. Relatively immobile, with a laser for an arm. So, I think it's a good fit. Love has the potential to throw the ball with the best of them. I'm not crowning him, but arm talent is why the Pack moved up to get him. That's a god given talent. The remaining QB's available can't develop an arm like Love has.
I've also been hesitant to look at Love as a potential starter, but Rodgers is a full on head case, and he's not getting any younger, or less injury prone. If Love has a good pre-season and locks himself in as the #2, he's just a snap away from playing.
I'm gonna say that Love is a Rogers type QB. Relatively immobile, with a laser for an arm. So, I think it's a good fit. Love has the potential to throw the ball with the best of them. I'm not crowning him, but arm talent is why the Pack moved up to get him. That's a god given talent. The remaining QB's available can't develop an arm like Love has.
I've also been hesitant to look at Love as a potential starter, but Rodgers is a full on head case, and he's not getting any younger, or less injury prone. If Love has a good pre-season and locks himself in as the #2, he's just a snap away from playing.
- AggieFBObsession
- Posts: 3200
- Joined: January 25th, 2011, 12:15 pm
- Has thanked: 6806 times
- Been thanked: 1237 times
Re: Jordan Love Analysis
Someone made a good point to me today. Rogers is going to be pushed by Jordan Love. Healthy competition makes players better. Let's see how Rogers handles it. If he doesn't handle it well enough Jordan will play.
-
- Posts: 23490
- Joined: August 22nd, 2011, 2:18 pm
- Has thanked: 7882 times
- Been thanked: 2842 times
Re: Jordan Love Analysis
I think we need to check ourselves if we think Love will play this year for any other reason than Rogers being injured or in a blowout.
Further, Rogers isn't going to be pushed by Love. At this stage of their careers Rogers is playing 4-D chess while Love is drawing tic tac toe grids with crayons.
Love has a ton of talent but has a long long way to go. Being reasonable with expectations will help him.
Further, Rogers isn't going to be pushed by Love. At this stage of their careers Rogers is playing 4-D chess while Love is drawing tic tac toe grids with crayons.
Love has a ton of talent but has a long long way to go. Being reasonable with expectations will help him.
- These users thanked the author FloridaAggie13 for the post:
- sneed
-
- Posts: 9215
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:10 am
- Has thanked: 321 times
- Been thanked: 2801 times
Re: Jordan Love Analysis
Mel Kiper defended Jordan Love having stats go down last year, talking about losing the other offensive starters and his head coach and coordinator. Don't know if that's good or bad though!
-
- Posts: 14176
- Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
- Has thanked: 932 times
- Been thanked: 1969 times