Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
--For every Aggie victory, I'm going streaking on the quad!
- hipsterdoofus21
- Mr. Buttface
- Posts: 18007
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 9:39 pm
- Has thanked: 3014 times
- Been thanked: 3032 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
NOOICE!!!
- These users thanked the author hipsterdoofus21 for the post (total 2):
- ViAggie • MetsJetsAggies
-
- Posts: 7646
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:07 pm
- Has thanked: 396 times
- Been thanked: 4610 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
Two more wins, and we are “in.” Four more wins and we are a 7 seed, IMO (so long as it’s SDSU in the final).
- Roy McAvoy
- Posts: 7435
- Joined: November 2nd, 2011, 1:30 pm
- Has thanked: 1150 times
- Been thanked: 2853 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
I’d like to point out that NC state and Clemson, ranked 33 and 35 in the net ranking last year respectively, and didn’t get in to the tournament.
I still think we need to make it to the mwc championship game.
I still think we need to make it to the mwc championship game.
- These users thanked the author Roy McAvoy for the post:
- CodingAggieBlue
- MrBiggle
- Posts: 3118
- Joined: October 10th, 2013, 12:15 pm
- Has thanked: 2766 times
- Been thanked: 529 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
Ding ding ding.Roy McAvoy wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 7:36 amI’d like to point out that NC state and Clemson, ranked 33 and 35 in the net ranking last year respectively, and didn’t get in to the tournament.
I still think we need to make it to the mwc championship game.
Even with that it could go either way. Just gotta win win win.
Where only sage brush grows
- Sl7vk
- Posts: 2674
- Joined: November 18th, 2018, 9:07 pm
- Location: Holladay Utah
- Has thanked: 815 times
- Been thanked: 1835 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
The way we are peaking and SDSU is cratering right now, I feel like we might be the favorites to win the tourny anyways.
- These users thanked the author Sl7vk for the post:
- ThunderAggie
- SweepDance
- Posts: 539
- Joined: February 7th, 2011, 12:18 pm
- Location: Sandy, UT
- Has thanked: 205 times
- Been thanked: 236 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
We moved up three spots over idle teams because we beat lowly SJSU? I know I've said it before, but I'm still not buying the NET's supposed cap on margin of victory at 10.
Take, for example, when St. Mary's beat Arizona State by 40. They moved up from #64 to #36. I know it was only 12 games into the season but there's no way they shoot up that far if they beat them by only 10.
What this tells me is that if you show no mercy and blow teams out by as much as possible and you'll get rewarded.
Take, for example, when St. Mary's beat Arizona State by 40. They moved up from #64 to #36. I know it was only 12 games into the season but there's no way they shoot up that far if they beat them by only 10.
What this tells me is that if you show no mercy and blow teams out by as much as possible and you'll get rewarded.
- These users thanked the author SweepDance for the post (total 2):
- Roy McAvoy • Real Life Aggie
-
- Posts: 8367
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Has thanked: 992 times
- Been thanked: 870 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
TeamRankings disagrees, giving us a 28% chance. SDS has a 49% chance.
- These users thanked the author utaggies for the post:
- FloridaAggie13
- MarioWest
- Posts: 919
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 9:48 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Has thanked: 59 times
- Been thanked: 184 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
The "scoring margin" component may be capped at 10, but the "net offensive and defensive efficiency" component rewards teams for running up the score.SweepDance wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 8:07 amWe moved up three spots over idle teams because we beat lowly SJSU? I know I've said it before, but I'm still not buying the NET's supposed cap on margin of victory at 10.
Take, for example, when St. Mary's beat Arizona State by 40. They moved up from #64 to #36. I know it was only 12 games into the season but there's no way they shoot up that far if they beat them by only 10.
What this tells me is that if you show no mercy and blow teams out by as much as possible and you'll get rewarded.
If you google "net ratings margin of victory," one of the first results, funnily enough, is a post from Cougarboard reading "there isn't a difference between winning by 12 and winning by 50 in NET ratings."
You see similar sentiments from fans and media pretty frequently, but it isn't true. Clarity is not the NCAA's strong suit. Buffalo's coach has admitted he encourages players to run up the margin in blowouts.
- These users thanked the author MarioWest for the post:
- SweepDance
-
- SJSU Ultimate Loser Award Winner - Given to someone that should probably give up but won't.
- Posts: 23328
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:09 am
- Location: Where the sagebrush grows!
- Has thanked: 1400 times
- Been thanked: 3128 times
-
- Posts: 23293
- Joined: August 22nd, 2011, 2:18 pm
- Has thanked: 7629 times
- Been thanked: 2792 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
Agreed. The 30+ win team will be the favorite, and should be, regardless of the recent trendline. At the end of the day SDSU still is winning their games.
- freakboy
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: November 4th, 2010, 12:54 pm
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 108 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
SweepDance wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 8:07 amWe moved up three spots over idle teams because we beat lowly SJSU? I know I've said it before, but I'm still not buying the NET's supposed cap on margin of victory at 10.
Take, for example, when St. Mary's beat Arizona State by 40. They moved up from #64 to #36. I know it was only 12 games into the season but there's no way they shoot up that far if they beat them by only 10.
What this tells me is that if you show no mercy and blow teams out by as much as possible and you'll get rewarded.
While the margin of victory is capped at 10, efficiency margin is not, so you can still benefit from blowing out a team.
edit: I should have read all the responses before posting.
- These users thanked the author freakboy for the post (total 2):
- SweepDance • treesap32
- Sl7vk
- Posts: 2674
- Joined: November 18th, 2018, 9:07 pm
- Location: Holladay Utah
- Has thanked: 815 times
- Been thanked: 1835 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
Sort of. They did lose.FloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 8:55 amAgreed. The 30+ win team will be the favorite, and should be, regardless of the recent trendline. At the end of the day SDSU still is winning their games.
We have a better win streak, and we look better in the eye test right now.
They don't scare me at all.
- brownjeans
- Flatulent
- Posts: 18612
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 951 times
- Been thanked: 1739 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
They play good defense and they have more players who are reliable, consistent scorers. We don't have that. We have to get an outlier game from someone to challenge them. Can that happen? Yes, but that's not something to bet on.Sl7vk wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 11:33 amSort of. They did lose.FloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 8:55 amAgreed. The 30+ win team will be the favorite, and should be, regardless of the recent trendline. At the end of the day SDSU still is winning their games.
We have a better win streak, and we look better in the eye test right now.
They don't scare me at all.
- These users thanked the author brownjeans for the post:
- oleblu111
- Sl7vk
- Posts: 2674
- Joined: November 18th, 2018, 9:07 pm
- Location: Holladay Utah
- Has thanked: 815 times
- Been thanked: 1835 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
I'm not sure I agree.brownjeans wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 11:41 amThey play good defense and they have more players who are reliable, consistent scorers. We don't have that. We have to get an outlier game from someone to challenge them.Sl7vk wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 11:33 amSort of. They did lose.FloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 8:55 amAgreed. The 30+ win team will be the favorite, and should be, regardless of the recent trendline. At the end of the day SDSU still is winning their games.
We have a better win streak, and we look better in the eye test right now.
They don't scare me at all.
With a gimpy Merrill or Keita, yes you are right.
With a healthy Merrill, Keita and rampant Bean, I think we match up very well.
- USU78
- Pick'em Champ - '16 Weekly
- Posts: 15338
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:43 am
- Location: Sandy
- Has thanked: 7112 times
- Been thanked: 2073 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
# 31 on Sagarin: http://sagarin.com/sports/cbsend.htm
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
-
- Posts: 8367
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Has thanked: 992 times
- Been thanked: 870 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
On a neutral court Sagarin says we are a 4+ underdog to SDS right now.Sl7vk wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 11:42 amI'm not sure I agree.brownjeans wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 11:41 amThey play good defense and they have more players who are reliable, consistent scorers. We don't have that. We have to get an outlier game from someone to challenge them.Sl7vk wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 11:33 amSort of. They did lose.FloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 8:55 amAgreed. The 30+ win team will be the favorite, and should be, regardless of the recent trendline. At the end of the day SDSU still is winning their games.
We have a better win streak, and we look better in the eye test right now.
They don't scare me at all.
With a gimpy Merrill or Keita, yes you are right.
With a healthy Merrill, Keita and rampant Bean, I think we match up very well.
-
- Posts: 914
- Joined: January 19th, 2020, 4:57 pm
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 557 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
Yeah, that dang Air Force loss will forever haunt this team. Sorta like not using protection on prom night. If they don’t make it to the tournament, that one bad night will be the reason why.Roy McAvoy wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 7:36 amI’d like to point out that NC state and Clemson, ranked 33 and 35 in the net ranking last year respectively, and didn’t get in to the tournament.
I still think we need to make it to the mwc championship game.
-
- Posts: 8367
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Has thanked: 992 times
- Been thanked: 870 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
No, the BSU loss was worse and will be remembered much longer than the toe-stub that was the loss to the AFA. The BSU loss was an historic choke job. Even if it recedes into the memories of USU fans, BSU fans will forever remember it and share it with usFL350Aggie wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 1:38 pmYeah, that dang Air Force loss will forever haunt this team. Sorta like not using protection on prom night. If they don’t make it to the tournament, that one bad night will be the reason why.Roy McAvoy wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 7:36 amI’d like to point out that NC state and Clemson, ranked 33 and 35 in the net ranking last year respectively, and didn’t get in to the tournament.
I still think we need to make it to the mwc championship game.
We remember the USU comeback to beat BSU in the Spectrum years ago that extended USU’s mastery over the Broncos in Logan. BSU’s win was much bigger than that one.
Either beating BSU or AFA would likely have gotten us into the NCAA w/o having to win our MWC semi-final game. But the BSU loss will be more unforgettable over time.
Last edited by utaggies on February 26th, 2020, 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ProvoAggie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14947
- Joined: June 14th, 2010, 1:00 am
- Location: Provo, Utah
- Has thanked: 1467 times
- Been thanked: 2864 times
- Contact:
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
The way that we lost to Boise was more embarrassing but on paper, the Air Force loss shouldn't have happened. When the committee is looking at our team sheet they'll see Boise as an overtime road loss to a borderline Q1 team...the Air Force loss on the other hand shows that we got beat badly by a borderline Q4 team. Boise State could have been a good win that would have helped our resume but removing the bad loss would help us more.utaggies wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 3:03 pmNo, the BSU loss was worse and will be remembered much longer than the toe-stub that was the loss to the AFA. The BSU loss was an historic choke job. Even if it recedes into the memories of USU fans, BSU fans will forever remember it and share it with usFL350Aggie wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 1:38 pmYeah, that dang Air Force loss will forever haunt this team. Sorta like not using protection on prom night. If they don’t make it to the tournament, that one bad night will be the reason why.Roy McAvoy wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 7:36 amI’d like to point out that NC state and Clemson, ranked 33 and 35 in the net ranking last year respectively, and didn’t get in to the tournament.
I still think we need to make it to the mwc championship game.
We remember the USU comeback to beat BSU in the Spectrum years ago that extended USU’s mastery over the Broncos in Logan. BSU’s win was much bigger than that one.
Either beating BSU or AFA would likely have gotten us into the NCAA w/o having to win our MWC semi-final game. But the BSU loss will be more forgettable over time.
- These users thanked the author ProvoAggie for the post:
- Zaggie07
-
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: December 2nd, 2010, 3:22 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
The loss to Boise was the BB gods equalizing the world. That win against Boise State sone years ago, we scored 10 points in the last minute to squeak out the victory. I remember jumping up and down on my couch.
- These users thanked the author bullshot for the post:
- ProvoAggie
- Zaggie07
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:28 pm
- Has thanked: 1162 times
- Been thanked: 280 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
We are a bit of a bubble team. Right now we are on the good side of the bubble. If we don't win the conference tournament, whether or not we get in will depend on how many bid stealers the are. Root for the favorites to win the tournaments, leaving as many true at large spots as possible.
*for those who may be unfamiliar, a bid stealer is a team that wins their conference tournament and would not have been considered otherwise, when there are also other teams in the conference that are considered locks. UNLV would be a bid stealer. Any team in the WCC but Gonzaga, St Mary's, and byu would be a bid stealer. Any team but Dayton in the A10 could be a bid stealer (maybe not RI or Richmond).
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
*for those who may be unfamiliar, a bid stealer is a team that wins their conference tournament and would not have been considered otherwise, when there are also other teams in the conference that are considered locks. UNLV would be a bid stealer. Any team in the WCC but Gonzaga, St Mary's, and byu would be a bid stealer. Any team but Dayton in the A10 could be a bid stealer (maybe not RI or Richmond).
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author Zaggie07 for the post:
- ThunderAggie
-
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: March 12th, 2018, 6:51 pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
That was last yearbullshot wrote:The loss to Boise was the BB gods equalizing the world. That win against Boise State sone years ago, we scored 10 points in the last minute to squeak out the victory. I remember jumping up and down on my couch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- MrBiggle
- Posts: 3118
- Joined: October 10th, 2013, 12:15 pm
- Has thanked: 2766 times
- Been thanked: 529 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
You think BYU is a bid stealer? Unless we win the MWC tournament, BYU will get a higher seed then us.Zaggie07 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 4:43 pmWe are a bit of a bubble team. Right now we are on the good side of the bubble. If we don't win the conference tournament, whether or not we get in will depend on how many bid stealers the are. Root for the favorites to win the tournaments, leaving as many true at large spots as possible.
*for those who may be unfamiliar, a bid stealer is a team that wins their conference tournament and would not have been considered otherwise, when there are also other teams in the conference that are considered locks. UNLV would be a bid stealer. Any team in the WCC but Gonzaga, St Mary's, and byu would be a bid stealer. Any team but Dayton in the A10 could be a bid stealer (maybe not RI or Richmond).
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Where only sage brush grows
- ProvoAggie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14947
- Joined: June 14th, 2010, 1:00 am
- Location: Provo, Utah
- Has thanked: 1467 times
- Been thanked: 2864 times
- Contact:
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
He said that anyone in the WCC outside of those 3 would be considered a bid stealer if they won the tournament.MrBiggle wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 6:50 pmYou think BYU is a bid stealer? Unless we win the MWC tournament, BYU will get a higher seed then us.Zaggie07 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 4:43 pmWe are a bit of a bubble team. Right now we are on the good side of the bubble. If we don't win the conference tournament, whether or not we get in will depend on how many bid stealers the are. Root for the favorites to win the tournaments, leaving as many true at large spots as possible.
*for those who may be unfamiliar, a bid stealer is a team that wins their conference tournament and would not have been considered otherwise, when there are also other teams in the conference that are considered locks. UNLV would be a bid stealer. Any team in the WCC but Gonzaga, St Mary's, and byu would be a bid stealer. Any team but Dayton in the A10 could be a bid stealer (maybe not RI or Richmond).
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
- MrBiggle
- Posts: 3118
- Joined: October 10th, 2013, 12:15 pm
- Has thanked: 2766 times
- Been thanked: 529 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
ProvoAggie wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 6:52 pmHe said that anyone in the WCC outside of those 3 would be considered a bid stealer if they won the tournament.MrBiggle wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 6:50 pmYou think BYU is a bid stealer? Unless we win the MWC tournament, BYU will get a higher seed then us.Zaggie07 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 4:43 pmWe are a bit of a bubble team. Right now we are on the good side of the bubble. If we don't win the conference tournament, whether or not we get in will depend on how many bid stealers the are. Root for the favorites to win the tournaments, leaving as many true at large spots as possible.
*for those who may be unfamiliar, a bid stealer is a team that wins their conference tournament and would not have been considered otherwise, when there are also other teams in the conference that are considered locks. UNLV would be a bid stealer. Any team in the WCC but Gonzaga, St Mary's, and byu would be a bid stealer. Any team but Dayton in the A10 could be a bid stealer (maybe not RI or Richmond).
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Where only sage brush grows
-
- Posts: 2296
- Joined: January 16th, 2011, 8:11 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 416 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
Rutgers just lost and they are the team ahead of us. We need to finish ahead of those Big 10 teams. Hopefully we can pass Stanford in the rankings as well. And then there was Florida, LSU and St. Marys.
-
- Posts: 1872
- Joined: January 26th, 2019, 6:27 pm
- Has thanked: 476 times
- Been thanked: 891 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
Rutgers is one of those teams that Bracketologists seem to down play their NET. Big rap against them is that they just have one win away (Purdue). One of the Big 10 teams that their NET won't be convincing if they don't make a little tourney noise.
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: December 18th, 2016, 7:27 pm
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
Thank you. I was one of these "win by 10; 11 doesn't matter" guys until tonight. Now I am back to advocating for a 1970s-1980s Nebraska football approach. Have great D and run the score up.MarioWest wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 8:37 amThe "scoring margin" component may be capped at 10, but the "net offensive and defensive efficiency" component rewards teams for running up the score.SweepDance wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 8:07 amWe moved up three spots over idle teams because we beat lowly SJSU? I know I've said it before, but I'm still not buying the NET's supposed cap on margin of victory at 10.
Take, for example, when St. Mary's beat Arizona State by 40. They moved up from #64 to #36. I know it was only 12 games into the season but there's no way they shoot up that far if they beat them by only 10.
What this tells me is that if you show no mercy and blow teams out by as much as possible and you'll get rewarded.
If you google "net ratings margin of victory," one of the first results, funnily enough, is a post from Cougarboard reading "there isn't a difference between winning by 12 and winning by 50 in NET ratings."
You see similar sentiments from fans and media pretty frequently, but it isn't true. Clarity is not the NCAA's strong suit. Buffalo's coach has admitted he encourages players to run up the margin in blowouts.
(of course I might still be way off. I am sure that our coaches and those at the other schools know how to manage the algorithm way better than we do)
GO BLUE SHIRTS!
-
- Posts: 23293
- Joined: August 22nd, 2011, 2:18 pm
- Has thanked: 7629 times
- Been thanked: 2792 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
Yes, they are certainly beatable and I would love to finally face them with a fully healthy team. But to date, they've only lost once which means they've won games where they didn't play well but still found a way to scrap out a victory. At the end of the day, while we may be the team peaking at the right time, there is no way we will be the 'favorite' to win the tournament over a team with 30+ wins and a top five national ranking.Sl7vk wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 11:33 amSort of. They did lose.FloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑February 26th, 2020, 8:55 amAgreed. The 30+ win team will be the favorite, and should be, regardless of the recent trendline. At the end of the day SDSU still is winning their games.
We have a better win streak, and we look better in the eye test right now.
They don't scare me at all.
-
- Posts: 8367
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Has thanked: 992 times
- Been thanked: 870 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
Here are the Bracket Matrix rankings through 2/24, with the results of games played on 2/25 and 2/26. The takeaway is that we’ll likely hold our position. The only things that could potentially move the dial is Rutgers losing — but I doubt we jump them since the loss was to a good Penn St. team.
#8
LSU -lost to Florida
Texas Tech - lost @ Oklahoma
Illinois - beat Nebraska
Arizona St. - idle
#9
St. Mary’s - idle
Florida - beat LSU
Rutgers - lost to Penn. St.
Virginia - beat Virginia Tech
#10
Indiana - idle
Xavier - beat DePaul
Wichita St. - idle
Rhode Island - beat Fordham
#11
USC - idle
Oklahoma - beat Texas Tech
Utah St. - beat SJS
Cincinnati - idle
Providence - idle
North Carolina St. - lost @ North Carolina
#12
E. Tennessee St.* - beat Wofford
No. Iowa* - beat Evansville
Liberty* - idle
Yale* - idle
First Four Out:
Richmond - beat George Washington
Stanford - beat Utah
Georgetown - lost to Marquette
Purdue - idle
Next Four Out:
Arkansas - beat Tennessee
Memphis - lost @ SMU
Mississippi - lost @ Auburn
Alabama - lost @ Mississippi St.
*One-bid league champs
#8
LSU -lost to Florida
Texas Tech - lost @ Oklahoma
Illinois - beat Nebraska
Arizona St. - idle
#9
St. Mary’s - idle
Florida - beat LSU
Rutgers - lost to Penn. St.
Virginia - beat Virginia Tech
#10
Indiana - idle
Xavier - beat DePaul
Wichita St. - idle
Rhode Island - beat Fordham
#11
USC - idle
Oklahoma - beat Texas Tech
Utah St. - beat SJS
Cincinnati - idle
Providence - idle
North Carolina St. - lost @ North Carolina
#12
E. Tennessee St.* - beat Wofford
No. Iowa* - beat Evansville
Liberty* - idle
Yale* - idle
First Four Out:
Richmond - beat George Washington
Stanford - beat Utah
Georgetown - lost to Marquette
Purdue - idle
Next Four Out:
Arkansas - beat Tennessee
Memphis - lost @ SMU
Mississippi - lost @ Auburn
Alabama - lost @ Mississippi St.
*One-bid league champs
-
- Posts: 8367
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:25 pm
- Has thanked: 992 times
- Been thanked: 870 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
Bracket Matrix
(Rankings through 2/24 and games through 2/27)
The takeaway is that our NET ranking may drop from 35 to 37 given that the two teams directly below us (Illinois and Purdue) won tonight. However, we may overtake Indiana and further solidify an 11 seed. Indiana will now be on life support.
#8
LSU -lost to Florida
Texas Tech - lost @ Oklahoma
Illinois - beat Nebraska
Arizona St. - lost to UCLA
#9
St. Mary’s - beat Santa Clara
Florida - beat LSU
Rutgers - lost to Penn. St.
Virginia - beat Virginia Tech
#10
Indiana - lost to Purdue
Xavier - beat DePaul
Wichita St. - beat Temple
Rhode Island - beat Fordham
#11
USC - beat Arizona
Oklahoma - beat Texas Tech
Utah St. - beat SJS
Cincinnati - idle
Providence - idle
North Carolina St. - lost @ North Carolina
#12
E. Tennessee St.* - beat Wofford
No. Iowa* - beat Evansville
Liberty* - beat Kennesaw St.
Yale* - beat Penn
First Four Out:
Richmond - beat George Washington
Stanford - beat Utah
Georgetown - lost to Marquette
Purdue - beat Indiana
Next Four Out:
Arkansas - beat Tennessee
Memphis - lost @ SMU
Mississippi - lost @ Auburn
Alabama - lost @ Mississippi St.
*One-bid league champs
(Rankings through 2/24 and games through 2/27)
The takeaway is that our NET ranking may drop from 35 to 37 given that the two teams directly below us (Illinois and Purdue) won tonight. However, we may overtake Indiana and further solidify an 11 seed. Indiana will now be on life support.
#8
LSU -lost to Florida
Texas Tech - lost @ Oklahoma
Illinois - beat Nebraska
Arizona St. - lost to UCLA
#9
St. Mary’s - beat Santa Clara
Florida - beat LSU
Rutgers - lost to Penn. St.
Virginia - beat Virginia Tech
#10
Indiana - lost to Purdue
Xavier - beat DePaul
Wichita St. - beat Temple
Rhode Island - beat Fordham
#11
USC - beat Arizona
Oklahoma - beat Texas Tech
Utah St. - beat SJS
Cincinnati - idle
Providence - idle
North Carolina St. - lost @ North Carolina
#12
E. Tennessee St.* - beat Wofford
No. Iowa* - beat Evansville
Liberty* - beat Kennesaw St.
Yale* - beat Penn
First Four Out:
Richmond - beat George Washington
Stanford - beat Utah
Georgetown - lost to Marquette
Purdue - beat Indiana
Next Four Out:
Arkansas - beat Tennessee
Memphis - lost @ SMU
Mississippi - lost @ Auburn
Alabama - lost @ Mississippi St.
*One-bid league champs
Last edited by utaggies on February 28th, 2020, 7:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 7646
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:07 pm
- Has thanked: 396 times
- Been thanked: 4610 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
The love these .500 Big Ten teams are getting is infuriating. I’ve seen Purdue play, and we would eat their lunch even on a bad day.
-
- Posts: 1615
- Joined: November 2nd, 2018, 7:52 am
- Has thanked: 1729 times
- Been thanked: 1084 times
Re: USU up to 35 on Net Ratings after SJSU win
That's probably what Big 10 schools are saying about a MW team being ranked near them. Haha!ineptimusprime wrote: ↑February 28th, 2020, 7:24 amThe love these .500 Big Ten teams are getting is infuriating. I’ve seen Purdue play, and we would eat their lunch even on a bad day.
It's a little ridiculous how much love they get.
Go Aggies!