Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
CSU/The Future
CSU/The Future
CSU is legit. They have won 5 in a row and are playing really well. They have really improved since the beginning of the year. They play different than last year. Carvacho is still a big part of their offense, but they no longer run the offense through him. Last night he had 4 points. They are young and very athletic. They have two freshmen Stevens a quick pg and Roddy a beast and athletic 4 man. He was recruited in the big 10 to play football. Anyways, they are top 100 Kenpom and if we can win it will be a good win.
CSU will be damn good next year, so will UNLV. SDSU will probably good, Nevada will be decent or better. All these teams have something we don’t. Very good athletes. I know we have Marco Anthony, but are we recruiting any more guards. I like Bairstow and I like our recruits, but I think it is obvious we need an athletic PG. 22 do you know what we are recruiting for next year?
CSU will be damn good next year, so will UNLV. SDSU will probably good, Nevada will be decent or better. All these teams have something we don’t. Very good athletes. I know we have Marco Anthony, but are we recruiting any more guards. I like Bairstow and I like our recruits, but I think it is obvious we need an athletic PG. 22 do you know what we are recruiting for next year?
-
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: November 17th, 2010, 6:32 pm
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 1366 times
Re: CSU/The Future
Wow...decent..you are making me blush.
- These users thanked the author nvspuds for the post:
- Real Life Aggie
-
- Posts: 1615
- Joined: November 2nd, 2018, 7:52 am
- Has thanked: 1729 times
- Been thanked: 1084 times
Re: CSU/The Future
Here's my struggle with the "we're not athletic enough" argument. We didn't lose our games this year because we weren't athletic enough, with the exception of SDSU, we lost them because we had a low effort, low urgency, lousy streaky shooting and a bunch of injuries. We didn't get blown out at AFA or UNLV because we were less athletic.
Go Aggies!
-
- Posts: 9456
- Joined: September 12th, 2018, 2:01 pm
- Has thanked: 2929 times
- Been thanked: 4358 times
Re: CSU/The Future
CSU has a good coach and is recruiting well. We better come ready as they are a good team. Need our guards to play well.
- 2004AG
- Posts: 12418
- Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 795 times
- Been thanked: 1598 times
Re: CSU/The Future
It was obvious last year to everybody not named Craig smith that we needed an athletic PG and unfortunately he’s the only one who matters.bpd wrote:CSU is legit. They have won 5 in a row and are playing really well. They have really improved since the beginning of the year. They play different than last year. Carvacho is still a big part of their offense, but they no longer run the offense through him. Last night he had 4 points. They are young and very athletic. They have two freshmen Stevens a quick pg and Roddy a beast and athletic 4 man. He was recruited in the big 10 to play football. Anyways, they are top 100 Kenpom and if we can win it will be a good win.
CSU will be damn good next year, so will UNLV. SDSU will probably good, Nevada will be decent or better. All these teams have something we don’t. Very good athletes. I know we have Marco Anthony, but are we recruiting any more guards. I like Bairstow and I like our recruits, but I think it is obvious we need an athletic PG. 22 do you know what we are recruiting for next year?
I think Anthony will be our athletic pg but I’d really like to see smith recruit over miller and get an athletic shooting guard.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Aggie Insider, Pick'em Champ - '18 Kickoff, '19 Weekly
- Posts: 19414
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:17 pm
- Location: Smithfield, Utah
- Has thanked: 23385 times
- Been thanked: 15517 times
- Contact:
Re: CSU/The Future
I think there is a good chance that we'll try and add another guard (possibly JuCo) and another McChesney-like stretch 4.bpd wrote: ↑January 23rd, 2020, 9:34 pmCSU is legit. They have won 5 in a row and are playing really well. They have really improved since the beginning of the year. They play different than last year. Carvacho is still a big part of their offense, but they no longer run the offense through him. Last night he had 4 points. They are young and very athletic. They have two freshmen Stevens a quick pg and Roddy a beast and athletic 4 man. He was recruited in the big 10 to play football. Anyways, they are top 100 Kenpom and if we can win it will be a good win.
CSU will be damn good next year, so will UNLV. SDSU will probably good, Nevada will be decent or better. All these teams have something we don’t. Very good athletes. I know we have Marco Anthony, but are we recruiting any more guards. I like Bairstow and I like our recruits, but I think it is obvious we need an athletic PG. 22 do you know what we are recruiting for next year?
- brownjeans
- Flatulent
- Posts: 18612
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 951 times
- Been thanked: 1739 times
Re: CSU/The Future
As long as we can defend and MAKE shots, I'm good with our athleticism.
As for CSU, I doubt we lose at home to anyone else. On the road? I have no confidence that we can beat anyone.
As for CSU, I doubt we lose at home to anyone else. On the road? I have no confidence that we can beat anyone.
-
- Posts: 9456
- Joined: September 12th, 2018, 2:01 pm
- Has thanked: 2929 times
- Been thanked: 4358 times
Re: CSU/The Future
Great point our biggest issue this year and especially in conference is our shooting. Our 3 point shooting is horrendous and is keeping us from winning more games. Nevada and Boise are more athletic than us and other than the disaster last 3 minutes of Boise we dominated those games. If we can get our 3 point % up we will be a tough team to beat. If we stay at 30% or below we will struggle.brownjeans wrote: ↑January 24th, 2020, 1:46 amAs long as we can defend and MAKE shots, I'm good with our athleticism.
As for CSU, I doubt we lose at home to anyone else. On the road? I have no confidence that we can beat anyone.
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: January 4th, 2013, 12:30 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: CSU/The Future
No one can argue with wanting more athletic players. Everyone wants athleticism, as long as there is talent to accompany it. This "unathletic" Aggie team stormed the MWC last year and beat teams with more athleticism. While more athleticism is hoped for, I don't think comparatively lacking athleticism is our problem, or main problem, this year.
- Aglicious
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7149
- Joined: January 14th, 2004, 12:00 am
- Location: Vega$
- Has thanked: 934 times
- Been thanked: 2432 times
Re: CSU/The Future
I see a lot of teams getting better next year - even more improvement than we have seen this year league wide.
As for the Aggies, I'm not convinced we are keeping pace. I like coach Smith's energy and the way he gets his players to play for him but I'm tired of being the "plucky, hard working, fundamentally sound, (insert next buzz word here for nonathletic), etc." team. Imagine being all of those things and also being athletic! Why is it that we have been conditioned to think it has to be one or the other in Logan?
As for the Aggies, I'm not convinced we are keeping pace. I like coach Smith's energy and the way he gets his players to play for him but I'm tired of being the "plucky, hard working, fundamentally sound, (insert next buzz word here for nonathletic), etc." team. Imagine being all of those things and also being athletic! Why is it that we have been conditioned to think it has to be one or the other in Logan?
- These users thanked the author Aglicious for the post:
- AggieFBObsession
-
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: November 5th, 2010, 10:10 pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 766 times
Re: CSU/The Future
Because USU and its fans are cheap whiners who are mean on message boards and Logan is a racist town with no bars and a corrupt police force. Logan has really changed over the last 50 years for the worst and now ath- a- letic players have no interest getting a quality education at such a place. I wish it was more like it was in the 60's.Aglicious wrote: ↑January 24th, 2020, 10:37 amI see a lot of teams getting better next year - even more improvement than we have seen this year league wide.
As for the Aggies, I'm not convinced we are keeping pace. I like coach Smith's energy and the way he gets his players to play for him but I'm tired of being the "plucky, hard working, fundamentally sound, (insert next buzz word here for nonathletic), etc." team. Imagine being all of those things and also being athletic! Why is it that we have been conditioned to think it has to be one or the other in Logan?
Regulator of Class
- Real Life Aggie
- Posts: 3963
- Joined: April 10th, 2019, 4:28 pm
- Location: Tucson, AZ
- Has thanked: 5182 times
- Been thanked: 1816 times
Re: CSU/The Future
Because all the things you complained about where TOTALLY better in the 60s.coolag wrote: ↑January 24th, 2020, 11:14 amBecause USU and its fans are cheap whiners who are mean on message boards and Logan is a racist town with no bars and a corrupt police force. Logan has really changed over the last 50 years for the worst and now ath- a- letic players have no interest getting a quality education at such a place. I wish it was more like it was in the 60's.Aglicious wrote: ↑January 24th, 2020, 10:37 amI see a lot of teams getting better next year - even more improvement than we have seen this year league wide.
As for the Aggies, I'm not convinced we are keeping pace. I like coach Smith's energy and the way he gets his players to play for him but I'm tired of being the "plucky, hard working, fundamentally sound, (insert next buzz word here for nonathletic), etc." team. Imagine being all of those things and also being athletic! Why is it that we have been conditioned to think it has to be one or the other in Logan?
- dyedblue
- Posts: 8429
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 842 times
Re: CSU/The Future
You forgot to mention the cartels...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author dyedblue for the post:
- ShowMeAggie
“The winning team has a dedication. It will have a core of veteran players who set the standards. They will not accept defeat.” --Merlin Olsen
-
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: November 17th, 2010, 6:32 pm
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 1366 times
Re: CSU/The Future
I don't know that Nevada is particularly athletic. Like every team, including you, other than SDSU, they are good at home mediocre on the road. The thing Nevada does best is catch and shoot 3's at a pretty good clip. That is probably, the least athletic thing you can do on a basketball court.Aggie84025 wrote: ↑January 24th, 2020, 9:10 amGreat point our biggest issue this year and especially in conference is our shooting. Our 3 point shooting is horrendous and is keeping us from winning more games. Nevada and Boise are more athletic than us and other than the disaster last 3 minutes of Boise we dominated those games. If we can get our 3 point % up we will be a tough team to beat. If we stay at 30% or below we will struggle.brownjeans wrote: ↑January 24th, 2020, 1:46 amAs long as we can defend and MAKE shots, I'm good with our athleticism.
As for CSU, I doubt we lose at home to anyone else. On the road? I have no confidence that we can beat anyone.
- brownjeans
- Flatulent
- Posts: 18612
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 951 times
- Been thanked: 1739 times
-
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: November 5th, 2010, 10:10 pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 766 times
Re: CSU/The Future
Sarcasm my fellow Aggie sarcasm.Real Life Aggie wrote: ↑January 24th, 2020, 12:48 pmBecause all the things you complained about where TOTALLY better in the 60s.coolag wrote: ↑January 24th, 2020, 11:14 amBecause USU and its fans are cheap whiners who are mean on message boards and Logan is a racist town with no bars and a corrupt police force. Logan has really changed over the last 50 years for the worst and now ath- a- letic players have no interest getting a quality education at such a place. I wish it was more like it was in the 60's.Aglicious wrote: ↑January 24th, 2020, 10:37 amI see a lot of teams getting better next year - even more improvement than we have seen this year league wide.
As for the Aggies, I'm not convinced we are keeping pace. I like coach Smith's energy and the way he gets his players to play for him but I'm tired of being the "plucky, hard working, fundamentally sound, (insert next buzz word here for nonathletic), etc." team. Imagine being all of those things and also being athletic! Why is it that we have been conditioned to think it has to be one or the other in Logan?
Regulator of Class
-
- Posts: 3805
- Joined: December 16th, 2014, 11:17 pm
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 110 times
Re: CSU/The Future
Based on recovery from injuries and a newfound sense of urgency, I think USU will lose no more than 2 the rest of the conference season.
“Apathy and tolerance are the final virtues of a dying society.” - Aristotle