NET Rating Tracker

This forum is for Basketball discussion only. Other topics will be moved to the appropriate forum.
User avatar
Roy McAvoy
Posts: 5356
Joined: November 2nd, 2011, 1:30 pm
Has thanked: 370 times
Been thanked: 608 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by Roy McAvoy » December 19th, 2019, 11:01 am

treesap32 wrote:
December 19th, 2019, 9:41 am
The life of NET ratings... Win against USF on a neutral site and drop in the rankings. USF went up by losing to us.
I think our drop was more due to LSU losing to East Tennessee state.



slcagg
Posts: 3987
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 6:29 pm
Has thanked: 299 times
Been thanked: 443 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by slcagg » December 19th, 2019, 11:16 am

Roy McAvoy wrote:
December 19th, 2019, 11:01 am
treesap32 wrote:
December 19th, 2019, 9:41 am
The life of NET ratings... Win against USF on a neutral site and drop in the rankings. USF went up by losing to us.
I think our drop was more due to LSU losing to East Tennessee state.
Correct. But as I pointed out in another thread I’m not sure why LSU is so high. They are higher than all 3 teams they have lost to.



SLB
Posts: 2175
Joined: November 3rd, 2016, 8:47 pm
Has thanked: 161 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by SLB » December 19th, 2019, 11:19 am

slcagg wrote:
December 19th, 2019, 11:16 am
Roy McAvoy wrote:
December 19th, 2019, 11:01 am
treesap32 wrote:
December 19th, 2019, 9:41 am
The life of NET ratings... Win against USF on a neutral site and drop in the rankings. USF went up by losing to us.
I think our drop was more due to LSU losing to East Tennessee state.
Correct. But as I pointed out in another thread I’m not sure why LSU is so high. They are higher than all 3 teams they have lost to.
It is whole score efficiency focus added to the NET rankings.



User avatar
Zaggie07
Posts: 882
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:28 pm
Has thanked: 311 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by Zaggie07 » December 19th, 2019, 4:33 pm


ProvoAggie wrote:This is something that treesap and I are working on. It's not done yet but you can see our schedule breakdown with NET Quadrants and records here:
Image
https://www.bracketologists.com/team/utah-state-aggies

Outside of the team pages not a lot is complete yet.
Amazing website. Wow.

If you are taking suggestions, on the team pages I notice that the chart which tracks NET rating over time scales from 1-400. It can be difficult to see changes. Would there be any way to dynamically make the scale fit the values better? So, for the Aggies our NET has gone from 47 to 47 to 51 to 55. Perhaps fit the scale from 45 to 60. If our rating moves outside of that, the scale would adjust accordingly, such as if we move up to 43 the scale would be 40 to 60.

Might not be as good for comparing teams since the scale would be different for each, but I don't suppose that is the main use of the trend line anyway.

Anyway, just a thought.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

These users thanked the author Zaggie07 for the post:
SweepDance



User avatar
ProvoAggie
Site Admin
Posts: 12651
Joined: June 14th, 2010, 1:00 am
Location: Provo, Utah
Has thanked: 565 times
Been thanked: 646 times
Contact:

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by ProvoAggie » December 19th, 2019, 5:01 pm

Zaggie07 wrote:
December 19th, 2019, 4:33 pm
ProvoAggie wrote:This is something that treesap and I are working on. It's not done yet but you can see our schedule breakdown with NET Quadrants and records here:
Image
https://www.bracketologists.com/team/utah-state-aggies

Outside of the team pages not a lot is complete yet.
Amazing website. Wow.

If you are taking suggestions, on the team pages I notice that the chart which tracks NET rating over time scales from 1-400. It can be difficult to see changes. Would there be any way to dynamically make the scale fit the values better? So, for the Aggies our NET has gone from 47 to 47 to 51 to 55. Perhaps fit the scale from 45 to 60. If our rating moves outside of that, the scale would adjust accordingly, such as if we move up to 43 the scale would be 40 to 60.

Might not be as good for comparing teams since the scale would be different for each, but I don't suppose that is the main use of the trend line anyway.

Anyway, just a thought.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I made some small tweaks to the graph. It's something that sap and I argued about. Being that I was the programmer I initially won but if other's want that then I'll give in a little.
These users thanked the author ProvoAggie for the post:
Zaggie07



User avatar
Zaggie07
Posts: 882
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:28 pm
Has thanked: 311 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by Zaggie07 » December 19th, 2019, 5:09 pm

ProvoAggie wrote:
Zaggie07 wrote:
December 19th, 2019, 4:33 pm
ProvoAggie wrote:This is something that treesap and I are working on. It's not done yet but you can see our schedule breakdown with NET Quadrants and records here:
Image
https://www.bracketologists.com/team/utah-state-aggies

Outside of the team pages not a lot is complete yet.
Amazing website. Wow.

If you are taking suggestions, on the team pages I notice that the chart which tracks NET rating over time scales from 1-400. It can be difficult to see changes. Would there be any way to dynamically make the scale fit the values better? So, for the Aggies our NET has gone from 47 to 47 to 51 to 55. Perhaps fit the scale from 45 to 60. If our rating moves outside of that, the scale would adjust accordingly, such as if we move up to 43 the scale would be 40 to 60.

Might not be as good for comparing teams since the scale would be different for each, but I don't suppose that is the main use of the trend line anyway.

Anyway, just a thought.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I made some small tweaks to the graph. It's something that sap and I argued about. Being that I was the programmer I initially won but if other's want that then I'll give in a little.
Increments of 25 works. You are a wizard.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk




sneed
Posts: 832
Joined: November 16th, 2010, 2:32 am
Has thanked: 895 times
Been thanked: 45 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by sneed » December 19th, 2019, 7:54 pm

SDSU didn’t stay at #1 very long. Cool they are so high.



Donman
Posts: 2539
Joined: November 4th, 2010, 9:49 am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by Donman » December 19th, 2019, 8:13 pm

sneed wrote:SDSU didn’t stay at #1 very long. Cool they are so high.
Higher than Love and Bright?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

These users thanked the author Donman for the post:
Real Life Aggie



User avatar
Real Life Aggie
Posts: 864
Joined: April 10th, 2019, 4:28 pm
Location: North Ogden, UT
Has thanked: 1006 times
Been thanked: 408 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by Real Life Aggie » December 19th, 2019, 8:35 pm

Donman wrote:
December 19th, 2019, 8:13 pm
sneed wrote:SDSU didn’t stay at #1 very long. Cool they are so high.
Higher than Love and Bright?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Pretty blunt comment.



dogie
Posts: 3055
Joined: November 4th, 2010, 7:56 pm
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by dogie » December 19th, 2019, 8:42 pm

treesap32 wrote:
December 19th, 2019, 9:41 am
The life of NET ratings... Win against USF on a neutral site and drop in the rankings. USF went up by losing to us.
Maybe because the two teams essentially played to a tie game and the USU and USF ended up getting repositioned a little closer to each other.



User avatar
treesap32
Moderator
Posts: 14898
Joined: July 28th, 2005, 1:00 am
Location: Washington D.C.
Has thanked: 256 times
Been thanked: 497 times
Contact:

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by treesap32 » December 20th, 2019, 7:52 am

dogie wrote:
December 19th, 2019, 8:42 pm
treesap32 wrote:
December 19th, 2019, 9:41 am
The life of NET ratings... Win against USF on a neutral site and drop in the rankings. USF went up by losing to us.
Maybe because the two teams essentially played to a tie game and the USU and USF ended up getting repositioned a little closer to each other.
Margin of victory does weigh into the formula, but I suspect the weight is very little. But you are correct, for overtime games, the winning team is granted a 1 point win, regardless of the margin of victory at the end of any overtimes.



User avatar
freakboy
Posts: 1201
Joined: November 4th, 2010, 12:54 pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 69 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by freakboy » December 20th, 2019, 1:04 pm

Margin of victory is capped at 10, but net efficiency is effectively a margin of victory and that is uncapped.



jpswensen
Posts: 1503
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 6:59 pm
Location: Pullman, WA
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 205 times
Contact:

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by jpswensen » December 20th, 2019, 1:58 pm

ProvoAggie and treesap32, have you guys posted this places like Reddit's /r/CollegeBasketball? I suspect you could get a lot of national interest because of how clean and easy to follow the website design is.

Is your server set up to take a huge load if it did get some national attention? Or, have you already been getting national recognition and we just don't know about it.
These users thanked the author jpswensen for the post:
Aggie19


Jordan Nathan's #2 Fan (seriously, YBA thinks he wins out against mom?!?!?!)

User avatar
treesap32
Moderator
Posts: 14898
Joined: July 28th, 2005, 1:00 am
Location: Washington D.C.
Has thanked: 256 times
Been thanked: 497 times
Contact:

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by treesap32 » December 20th, 2019, 2:53 pm

jpswensen wrote:
December 20th, 2019, 1:58 pm
ProvoAggie and treesap32, have you guys posted this places like Reddit's /r/CollegeBasketball? I suspect you could get a lot of national interest because of how clean and easy to follow the website design is.

Is your server set up to take a huge load if it did get some national attention? Or, have you already been getting national recognition and we just don't know about it.
Someone from this thread posted it on Reddit yesterday and it did get a good amount of love. Right now it's on a shared server, but if it takes off we might look at upgrading it. We'll see.
These users thanked the author treesap32 for the post (total 2):
USU78jpswensen



User avatar
GUS
Posts: 2700
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:04 am
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 152 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by GUS » December 20th, 2019, 4:00 pm

Somebody over on boogerboard mentioned it and set up a link. Don't let anyone tell you that they aren't interested in USU. Many of their members regularly lurk here.



SLB
Posts: 2175
Joined: November 3rd, 2016, 8:47 pm
Has thanked: 161 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by SLB » December 22nd, 2019, 2:41 pm

We are #51.



SLB
Posts: 2175
Joined: November 3rd, 2016, 8:47 pm
Has thanked: 161 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by SLB » December 22nd, 2019, 2:45 pm

From the NET rankings
0-2 Q1 games (St. Mary's and BYU)
2-0 Q2 games (LSU and Florida)
2-0 Q3 games (North Texas and USF)
7-0 Q4 games (everyone else not named STK)
1-0 non-D1 game (STK)



User avatar
Roy McAvoy
Posts: 5356
Joined: November 2nd, 2011, 1:30 pm
Has thanked: 370 times
Been thanked: 608 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by Roy McAvoy » December 22nd, 2019, 2:58 pm

SLB wrote:
December 22nd, 2019, 2:41 pm
We are #51.
Thanks for the update. And massive props for actually putting this in its proper thread instead of just creating another new thread again and typing one line.
These users thanked the author Roy McAvoy for the post:
BLUERUFiO



SLB
Posts: 2175
Joined: November 3rd, 2016, 8:47 pm
Has thanked: 161 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by SLB » December 22nd, 2019, 3:08 pm

Upset alert
#221 UAB beat #23 Duquesne
I suspected this might happen this Duquense has played weak opponents, and UAB is not a bad team.
#131 South Carolina beat #31 Virginia.
#115 New Mexico State got a road win against #90 Miss. State. MWC wins on this one since New Mexico State played New Mexico and Colorado State, and we might be in the top 50 from this.
#25 Richmond lost to #148 Radford 73-58.



User avatar
treesap32
Moderator
Posts: 14898
Joined: July 28th, 2005, 1:00 am
Location: Washington D.C.
Has thanked: 256 times
Been thanked: 497 times
Contact:

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by treesap32 » December 23rd, 2019, 11:03 am

We're back in the top 50. Click the image for more details.

Image



User avatar
SweepDance
Posts: 397
Joined: February 7th, 2011, 12:18 pm
Location: Sandy, UT
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by SweepDance » December 23rd, 2019, 4:03 pm

Margin of victory may be capped at 10 points, but those 10 points seem to weigh pretty heavily in the formula. Anytime I see a team move up or down significantly it's usually the result of a 10+ point win.



stwinward
Posts: 378
Joined: August 31st, 2013, 9:35 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by stwinward » December 23rd, 2019, 4:13 pm

I just clicked into this site. This is amazing. Well done, guys! I am honored to share time on a fan board with the likes of you. :thanks:



User avatar
SweepDance
Posts: 397
Joined: February 7th, 2011, 12:18 pm
Location: Sandy, UT
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by SweepDance » December 23rd, 2019, 4:22 pm

By the way, just had a BYU fan at work mention the site to me. Word is spreading!
These users thanked the author SweepDance for the post (total 3):
ProvoAggieBLUERUFiOsneed



User avatar
scotlandog
Posts: 1154
Joined: February 16th, 2011, 7:18 pm
Has thanked: 103 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by scotlandog » December 25th, 2019, 5:21 pm

Does anyone know of a NET predictor that would say what our NET would be IF we had beaten St Mary’s and BYU? Where would we be at if we were undefeated?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



User avatar
BLUERUFiO
Posts: 2389
Joined: August 30th, 2011, 1:22 pm
Location: Smithfield
Has thanked: 481 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by BLUERUFiO » December 25th, 2019, 6:45 pm

The NET Bracket on the site says we are the first of the first four out.


GO AGGIES! GO AGGIES! HEY! HEY! HEY!

User avatar
ineptimusprime
Posts: 2739
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:07 pm
Has thanked: 38 times
Been thanked: 563 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by ineptimusprime » December 25th, 2019, 6:55 pm

Our net ranking and, ultimately, seeding rests largely on how Florida and LSU do in SEC play.



sneed
Posts: 832
Joined: November 16th, 2010, 2:32 am
Has thanked: 895 times
Been thanked: 45 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by sneed » December 25th, 2019, 7:49 pm

scotlandog wrote:Does anyone know of a NET predictor that would say what our NET would be IF we had beaten St Mary’s and BYU? Where would we be at if we were undefeated?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That would be a cool feature. I really liked the rpi forecast - that would be a cool add on in the future. Predicts games you will win and percentages and what rpi (net in this case) you would likely have with number of wins and probabilities.



User avatar
treesap32
Moderator
Posts: 14898
Joined: July 28th, 2005, 1:00 am
Location: Washington D.C.
Has thanked: 256 times
Been thanked: 497 times
Contact:

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by treesap32 » December 25th, 2019, 8:34 pm

sneed wrote:
December 25th, 2019, 7:49 pm
scotlandog wrote:Does anyone know of a NET predictor that would say what our NET would be IF we had beaten St Mary’s and BYU? Where would we be at if we were undefeated?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That would be a cool feature. I really liked the rpi forecast - that would be a cool add on in the future. Predicts games you will win and percentages and what rpi (net in this case) you would likely have with number of wins and probabilities.
Freakboy is hoping to build this exact feature in a new website, but it's pretty hard when the NCAA won't release their formula for NET. Instead of having transparency, they have made it a secretive proprietary formula which is hard to predict. They've also reserved the right to tweak it along the way to their liking, even during the season.



User avatar
scotlandog
Posts: 1154
Joined: February 16th, 2011, 7:18 pm
Has thanked: 103 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by scotlandog » December 25th, 2019, 8:39 pm

treesap32 wrote:
sneed wrote:
December 25th, 2019, 7:49 pm
scotlandog wrote:Does anyone know of a NET predictor that would say what our NET would be IF we had beaten St Mary’s and BYU? Where would we be at if we were undefeated?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That would be a cool feature. I really liked the rpi forecast - that would be a cool add on in the future. Predicts games you will win and percentages and what rpi (net in this case) you would likely have with number of wins and probabilities.
Freakboy is hoping to build this exact feature in a new website, but it's pretty hard when the NCAA won't release their formula for NET. Instead of having transparency, they have made it a secretive proprietary formula which is hard to predict. They've also reserved the right to tweak it along the way to their liking, even during the season.
Understood. I was curious to see how big a negative impact those games have against us since both are playing pretty well. Is it a real negative effect against us or it it more a loss of a positive effect for us. Both are very close to us in the NET rankings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



User avatar
ProvoAggie
Site Admin
Posts: 12651
Joined: June 14th, 2010, 1:00 am
Location: Provo, Utah
Has thanked: 565 times
Been thanked: 646 times
Contact:

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by ProvoAggie » December 25th, 2019, 8:41 pm

scotlandog wrote:
treesap32 wrote:
sneed wrote:
December 25th, 2019, 7:49 pm
scotlandog wrote:Does anyone know of a NET predictor that would say what our NET would be IF we had beaten St Mary’s and BYU? Where would we be at if we were undefeated?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That would be a cool feature. I really liked the rpi forecast - that would be a cool add on in the future. Predicts games you will win and percentages and what rpi (net in this case) you would likely have with number of wins and probabilities.
Freakboy is hoping to build this exact feature in a new website, but it's pretty hard when the NCAA won't release their formula for NET. Instead of having transparency, they have made it a secretive proprietary formula which is hard to predict. They've also reserved the right to tweak it along the way to their liking, even during the season.
Understood. I was curious to see how big a negative impact those games have against us since both are playing pretty well. Is it a real negative effect against us or it it more a loss of a positive effect for us. Both are very close to us in the NET rankings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's pretty much a loss of being a positive. Losing Q1 and Q2 games don't really hurt you but winning them gives you a boost.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk




SDSU
Troll
Posts: 179
Joined: March 16th, 2019, 1:19 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by SDSU » December 25th, 2019, 11:44 pm

SLB wrote:
December 22nd, 2019, 2:41 pm
We are #51.
we are the #1 team in the country. SDSU



Cuchelain
Posts: 268
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 8:32 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 25 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by Cuchelain » December 26th, 2019, 12:38 am

Are you sure about that SDSU? Your moniker notwithstanding, the number of times you talk about BYU in your posts makes me question your claim that you are really a San Diego state fan. Seems to me you are a closet BYU fan trying to troll under a false identity as an Aztec.
These users thanked the author Cuchelain for the post:
scotlandog



utaggies
Posts: 4136
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:25 pm
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 127 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by utaggies » December 26th, 2019, 8:06 am

Cuchelain wrote:
December 26th, 2019, 12:38 am
Are you sure about that SDSU? Your moniker notwithstanding, the number of times you talk about BYU in your posts makes me question your claim that you are really a San Diego state fan. Seems to me you are a closet BYU fan trying to troll under a false identity as an Aztec.
DFTT - don’t feed the trolls



User avatar
usu99
Posts: 630
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 7:40 am
Location: Davis County
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by usu99 » December 26th, 2019, 10:43 am

The sucky part is just like football we can't beat the teams ahead of us.


For all of your IT needs visit http://www.sidelogic.com

User avatar
flying_scotsman2.0
Posts: 946
Joined: January 23rd, 2018, 12:29 pm
Has thanked: 476 times
Been thanked: 204 times

Re: NET Rating Tracker

Post by flying_scotsman2.0 » December 26th, 2019, 10:56 am

usu99 wrote:
December 26th, 2019, 10:43 am
The sucky part is just like football we can't beat the teams ahead of us.
Well, we did beat SDSU.
These users thanked the author flying_scotsman2.0 for the post:
BLUERUFiO



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic