Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
Your Best and Worst USU ADs
-
- Posts: 401
- Joined: November 4th, 2010, 10:37 am
- Has thanked: 206 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Your Best and Worst USU ADs
I got to thinking about the quality of Athletic Directors at USU since I have been an Aggie fan (1994). Just wanting to get some thoughts on who other posters thought were the best and worst USU ADs.
Best: Scott Barnes if I am not mistaken guided us to both WAC and MWC membership numerous facility improvements, and hired Gary Andersen to improve the football program.
Worst: Rance Pugmire, if he hadn't rolled his Dodge Durango we might be in the Big Sky Conference today. From the interviews I heard with him, he thought we belonged there.
Your thoughts?
Best: Scott Barnes if I am not mistaken guided us to both WAC and MWC membership numerous facility improvements, and hired Gary Andersen to improve the football program.
Worst: Rance Pugmire, if he hadn't rolled his Dodge Durango we might be in the Big Sky Conference today. From the interviews I heard with him, he thought we belonged there.
Your thoughts?
- These users thanked the author NavyBlue for the post (total 2):
- Roy McAvoy • aggies22
- WAAggie
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:02 am
- Location: Kent WA
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 517 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Barnes good stuff was seriously clouded with his fail at stews replacement.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author WAAggie for the post (total 5):
- Roy McAvoy • aggies22 • NavyBlue • aceofspadeskb • TrueBlueFan
-
- Posts: 3939
- Joined: December 13th, 2010, 10:07 pm
- Location: Salem, Oregon
- Has thanked: 687 times
- Been thanked: 1201 times
- Contact:
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
I won't pick a worst AD, but my choice for best, right now, is Buzz Williams. Buzz did everything he could to get us into the old WAC. When the WAC said we were kept out because of inadequate facilities, he built new facilities. New Romney Stadium and the Spectrum were built during his tenure. We complain about them now, but at the time they were built, they were two of the best venues in the western US. He brought in good coaches, and he wasn't afraid to schedule challenging opponents. I think eventually, John Hartwell may take the number one spot, but he hasn't been here long enough to qualify yet. Scott Barnes did a really good job, but loses major points for the lazy, halfhearted effort at replacing Stew. He was on his way out the door, and he just didn't care.
- These users thanked the author LKGates for the post (total 5):
- Roy McAvoy • aggies22 • USU78 • NavyBlue • NavyBlueAggie
Freelance adventurer and international man of mystery.
- USU78
- Pick'em Champ - '16 Weekly
- Posts: 15409
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:43 am
- Location: Sandy
- Has thanked: 7168 times
- Been thanked: 2087 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Agree in spades. I also agree that the worst was Rance, yet I still like the guy personally. He was just out of his depth. He was a lazy hire just as Duryea was a lazy hire ... and as Pella was a lazy hire ... and as Arslanian was a lazy hire.LKGates wrote: ↑June 12th, 2019, 9:27 amI won't pick a worst AD, but my choice for best, right now, is Buzz Williams. Buzz did everything he could to get us into the old WAC. When the WAC said we were kept out because of inadequate facilities, he built new facilities. New Romney Stadium and the Spectrum were built during his tenure. We complain about them now, but at the time they were built, they were two of the best venues in the western US. He brought in good coaches, and he wasn't afraid to schedule challenging opponents. I think eventually, John Hartwell may take the number one spot, but he hasn't been here long enough to qualify yet. Scott Barnes did a really good job, but loses major points for the lazy, halfhearted effort at replacing Stew. He was on his way out the door, and he just didn't care.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
-
- RIP
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 4:34 pm
- Has thanked: 922 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Keep in mind that the success of any A.D. is mostly do to the president.
Buss William did build both the spectrum and Romney, both were done without raising any money they just used student monies, as a result you got a football stadium with wood bleachers, cramped seating, no lights, terrible drainage, no restrooms on the east side, and half the prime seating going to the student body.
The spectrum was built on a side hill with easy access for students, but terrible for paying customers, very cramped seating. IMHO it is not and was not as good as YBU's, Utah's or gasp Weber state.
When a A.D has a president like sir Stan then things happen. Stan was the one that got Maverik to do the naming of the stadium remodel.
Buss William did build both the spectrum and Romney, both were done without raising any money they just used student monies, as a result you got a football stadium with wood bleachers, cramped seating, no lights, terrible drainage, no restrooms on the east side, and half the prime seating going to the student body.
The spectrum was built on a side hill with easy access for students, but terrible for paying customers, very cramped seating. IMHO it is not and was not as good as YBU's, Utah's or gasp Weber state.
When a A.D has a president like sir Stan then things happen. Stan was the one that got Maverik to do the naming of the stadium remodel.
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Although he's an Aggie through and through, I wasn't impressed with Rod Tueller's work as AD. I think that was a lazy hire.
-
- Posts: 401
- Joined: November 4th, 2010, 10:37 am
- Has thanked: 206 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Wasn't Rod Tueller who agreed to the 3 for 1s we were doing with BYU in the late 80's early 90's.
Then it went to 2 for 1s for a while....horrible.
Glad it is home and home again.
Then it went to 2 for 1s for a while....horrible.
Glad it is home and home again.
- dyedblue
- Posts: 8431
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 842 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
WowieGUS wrote:Although he's an Aggie through and through, I wasn't impressed with Rod Tueller's work as AD. I think that was a lazy hire.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“The winning team has a dedication. It will have a core of veteran players who set the standards. They will not accept defeat.” --Merlin Olsen
-
- Posts: 3525
- Joined: November 5th, 2010, 3:14 pm
- Has thanked: 494 times
- Been thanked: 706 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Let us be real. Where would we be without Jim Laub?
It’s a lot easier to be an AD with financial support.
It’s a lot easier to be an AD with financial support.
- BigBlueDart
- Pick'em Champ - '17 FB Predict the Score
- Posts: 9115
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 7:57 am
- Location: Syracuse, UT
- Has thanked: 254 times
- Been thanked: 1052 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
He is our Warren Buffett.
- These users thanked the author BigBlueDart for the post:
- NavyBlue
-
- Posts: 3525
- Joined: November 5th, 2010, 3:14 pm
- Has thanked: 494 times
- Been thanked: 706 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Is that anything like Chuckarama?
-
- Posts: 984
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:41 am
- Location: Perry, enfin
- Has thanked: 2142 times
- Been thanked: 409 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Worst for me is a tossup between Rance and Tueller. Chuck Bell did hire Dave Arslanian in a Barnes-esque move just prior to departure if I remember correctly. Best has been a progression from The Colonel to Barnes to Hartwell. Each built upon what the predecessor set in motion.
-
- Posts: 3939
- Joined: December 13th, 2010, 10:07 pm
- Location: Salem, Oregon
- Has thanked: 687 times
- Been thanked: 1201 times
- Contact:
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Our Phil Knight.
Freelance adventurer and international man of mystery.
-
- Aggie Insider, Pick'em Champ - '18 Kickoff, '19 Weekly
- Posts: 19445
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:17 pm
- Location: Smithfield, Utah
- Has thanked: 23409 times
- Been thanked: 15593 times
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 176
- Joined: December 17th, 2018, 4:50 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 50 times
-
- Posts: 8054
- Joined: October 22nd, 2016, 1:06 am
- Has thanked: 2309 times
- Been thanked: 2588 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Barnes made two good football hires and deserves credit for having the football program turn from zero to hero on his watch. However how he left with an obvious bad basketball hire as he had his bags packed and was on his way to the airport left a bad taste in my mouth that was there until Craig Smith came along.
- Aglicious
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7152
- Joined: January 14th, 2004, 12:00 am
- Location: Vega$
- Has thanked: 936 times
- Been thanked: 2435 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Yes, Barnes deserves blame for either striking out on his own targets or being lazy about Morrill's replacement but in the end, the hire of TD is on Morrill, the local media, and former players that pushed the Duryea hire on Barnes. He was most certainly not the candidate of choice by Barnes.
Still, the astounding magnitude of athletic growth, program changing events, and facility upgrades that happened under Barnes is hard to beat.
Still, the astounding magnitude of athletic growth, program changing events, and facility upgrades that happened under Barnes is hard to beat.
- Full
- Posts: 2509
- Joined: April 27th, 2011, 11:07 am
- Location: Davis County
- Has thanked: 727 times
- Been thanked: 426 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
I think Barnes passes on Duryea and takes another round of interviews if he didn’t have one four out the door. It has been suggested he wasn’t able to get his preferred guy, but I blame most of that on a lazy hire by someone who at that point didn’t have any motivation to put in the work.Aglicious wrote:Yes, Barnes deserves blame for either striking out on his own targets or being lazy about Morrill's replacement but in the end, the hire of TD is on Morrill, the local media, and former players that pushed the Duryea hire on Barnes. He was most certainly not the candidate of choice by Barnes.
Still, the astounding magnitude of athletic growth, program changing events, and facility upgrades that happened under Barnes is hard to beat.
Barnes was a good salesmen and was able to sell a vision of Aggie Athletics that others had laid a foundation for. He was a great hire for the time he was here, but I do think he was looking for the next opportunity and wasn’t always concerned with the long term.
-
- SJSU Ultimate Loser Award Winner - Given to someone that should probably give up but won't.
- Posts: 23464
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:09 am
- Location: Where the sagebrush grows!
- Has thanked: 1417 times
- Been thanked: 3217 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
I feel like Barnes buckled to former players and Stew on the Duryea hire. He couldn't secure Connors, so he made the easy hire and took his cut of the "search" money and left town. I would love to have a little Barnes sprinkled with a little Hartwell. We need the fiscal responsibility of Hartwell and the salesman of Barnes.
- dyedblue
- Posts: 8431
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 842 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
And Hartwell didn't find like a tent on the GA hire?NVAggie wrote:I feel like Barnes buckled to former players and Stew on the Duryea hire. He couldn't secure Connors, so he made the easy hire and took his cut of the "search" money and left town. I would love to have a little Barnes sprinkled with a little Hartwell. We need the fiscal responsibility of Hartwell and the salesman of Barnes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“The winning team has a dedication. It will have a core of veteran players who set the standards. They will not accept defeat.” --Merlin Olsen
-
- SJSU Ultimate Loser Award Winner - Given to someone that should probably give up but won't.
- Posts: 23464
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:09 am
- Location: Where the sagebrush grows!
- Has thanked: 1417 times
- Been thanked: 3217 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Hartwell also folded like a tent, but to the big donors, especially Laub. It could work out fine, but I always like to maintain a bit of skepticism. I guess we will see if the big donors are better than former players at hiring.
I will say this, not many were excited about the Duryea hire. Most of Aggie Nation is excited about Gary coming back.
I will say this, not many were excited about the Duryea hire. Most of Aggie Nation is excited about Gary coming back.
- Aglicious
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7152
- Joined: January 14th, 2004, 12:00 am
- Location: Vega$
- Has thanked: 936 times
- Been thanked: 2435 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
I could also go for a combo of Barnes and Spetman. On one hand you have the PR guy that really gets out and promotes your brand with the understanding of what needs to be done to compete with peer institutes and on the other you have a guy that is perhaps a little frugal and conservative but works his tail off even if it means doing the little stuff himself.NVAggie wrote: ↑June 25th, 2019, 7:27 amI feel like Barnes buckled to former players and Stew on the Duryea hire. He couldn't secure Connors, so he made the easy hire and took his cut of the "search" money and left town. I would love to have a little Barnes sprinkled with a little Hartwell. We need the fiscal responsibility of Hartwell and the salesman of Barnes.
-
- Posts: 8054
- Joined: October 22nd, 2016, 1:06 am
- Has thanked: 2309 times
- Been thanked: 2588 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
I was vocal in that we shouldn't have gone back to the well with GA, but he did do great things at USU last time as we all know. The last time he left USU he left us as conference champs and a top 20 team.dyedblue wrote: ↑June 25th, 2019, 7:35 amAnd Hartwell didn't find like a tent on the GA hire?NVAggie wrote:I feel like Barnes buckled to former players and Stew on the Duryea hire. He couldn't secure Connors, so he made the easy hire and took his cut of the "search" money and left town. I would love to have a little Barnes sprinkled with a little Hartwell. We need the fiscal responsibility of Hartwell and the salesman of Barnes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There really wasn't much logic in hiring Duryea. The program had been down for 4 years when he took over. Stew obviously wasn't going to get fired, but it was getting to the point where many ADs would have politely asked him to shake up the coaching staff, not promote them.
-
- Posts: 8054
- Joined: October 22nd, 2016, 1:06 am
- Has thanked: 2309 times
- Been thanked: 2588 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Yeah I agree with this and Barnes shouldn't be given a pass for the bad hire. Because he was leaving the future of Aggie basketball didn't mean anything to him, but it obviously continued to mean something to the University, the players, the students and of course us alumni and other fans. He made an obvious mistake and that will be part of his legacy along with the many good things he did. Legacies are complicated. There are very few that are all bad or all good.Full wrote: ↑June 24th, 2019, 10:17 pmI think Barnes passes on Duryea and takes another round of interviews if he didn’t have one four out the door. It has been suggested he wasn’t able to get his preferred guy, but I blame most of that on a lazy hire by someone who at that point didn’t have any motivation to put in the work.Aglicious wrote:Yes, Barnes deserves blame for either striking out on his own targets or being lazy about Morrill's replacement but in the end, the hire of TD is on Morrill, the local media, and former players that pushed the Duryea hire on Barnes. He was most certainly not the candidate of choice by Barnes.
Still, the astounding magnitude of athletic growth, program changing events, and facility upgrades that happened under Barnes is hard to beat.
Barnes was a good salesmen and was able to sell a vision of Aggie Athletics that others had laid a foundation for. He was a great hire for the time he was here, but I do think he was looking for the next opportunity and wasn’t always concerned with the long term.
-
- RIP
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: November 4th, 2010, 12:36 am
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 355 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
LK. I guess it’s a matter of perspective, and how much you agree with your old POP! My dad thought BUZZ dropped the ball on Ladells leaving USU! I was 15 at the time. Pop felt that BuZz ruiened Aggie basketball with the hire of T.L. Plain. The nickname Too Late Plain stuck! Most people in my Pops circle felt that Buzz should have hired Dale Brown Ladells assistant who helped get, Shaler Halimon, Nate Williams, Marv Roberts, etc., etc. well we all know the Brown still is considered LSU,s best coach ever! TL Plain had some good recruits but he didn’t know how to coach! He tried to implement a Kentucky slow down in a fast paced Aggie fast break! FAns hated it and we just PLAIN lost! So because of what my Pop taught me, BuZZ has been the worst AD because of hiring the wrong coaches!
Now with the Hiring of Amy Crosbie for the Women. Looks like Hartwell is getting his Ducks lined up when he moves on. It will be Bovee and Crosbie.
Now with the Hiring of Amy Crosbie for the Women. Looks like Hartwell is getting his Ducks lined up when he moves on. It will be Bovee and Crosbie.
- sam tingey
- Pick'em Champ - '13, '16 FB Predict the Score; '17, '18 Bowl
- Posts: 3636
- Joined: October 2nd, 2012, 8:40 am
- Has thanked: 1845 times
- Been thanked: 896 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
I hope Hartwell gets another good mens tennis coach.
- These users thanked the author sam tingey for the post:
- aggies22
-
- Posts: 2457
- Joined: November 15th, 2010, 6:36 pm
- Has thanked: 601 times
- Been thanked: 613 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
I will continue to get flak for it, but I still feel like this board is too hard on Barnes. Supposedly he would have signed Ben Howland if he hadn't gotten a job offer from Mississippi State. It wasn't his fault that Ben Howland got a better job offer at the last minute, nor was it his fault that he was only given enough money to offer Tommy Connor an embarrassingly low salary. Arguably he should have kept looking after Connor turned him down rather than just going the easy route and hiring Duryea, but I can understand why he didn't. Stew had announced his retirement in the middle of the season. It looked really bad that we still didn't have a coach long after the season ended and several candidates had turned us down. Nobody wants to be a school's second (or third or fourth or fifth) choice. And if people kept turning us down, it would start to look like it was a job nobody wanted. So I can certainly understand why he turned to Duryea given the circumstance. And on paper Duryea did not look like a terrible candidate. One could certainly do worse than the long-time top assistant for an extremely successful coach. Hindsight is 20/20, and I certainly wish Barnes had done something different knowing what I know now. But I don't think it's fair to say that Barnes made a lazy hire because he had one foot out the door.
- 2004AG
- Posts: 12423
- Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 798 times
- Been thanked: 1601 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
A lot of fake news there Stanford.StanfordAggie wrote:I will continue to get flak for it, but I still feel like this board is too hard on Barnes. Supposedly he would have signed Ben Howland if he hadn't gotten a job offer from Mississippi State. It wasn't his fault that Ben Howland got a better job offer at the last minute, nor was it his fault that he was only given enough money to offer Tommy Connor an embarrassingly low salary. Arguably he should have kept looking after Connor turned him down rather than just going the easy route and hiring Duryea, but I can understand why he didn't. Stew had announced his retirement in the middle of the season. It looked really bad that we still didn't have a coach long after the season ended and several candidates had turned us down. Nobody wants to be a school's second (or third or fourth or fifth) choice. And if people kept turning us down, it would start to look like it was a job nobody wanted. So I can certainly understand why he turned to Duryea given the circumstance. And on paper Duryea did not look like a terrible candidate. One could certainly do worse than the long-time top assistant for an extremely successful coach. Hindsight is 20/20, and I certainly wish Barnes had done something different knowing what I know now. But I don't think it's fair to say that Barnes made a lazy hire because he had one foot out the door.
1- Connors did not turn down the job. Barnes didn’t offer it to him. It was Barnes’s who didn’t think it was a good fit. But hey, maybe if you repeat that lie long enough, eventually it will be true.
2- It was 20/20 in that moment when he was hired. Not just in hindsight. About 95% of the people on here knew it was a horrible hire and the other 5% wanted to “wait and see”. It was really obvious Duryea was gonna suck except for Scott Barnes and usufan5477. Stew sucked the last 3-4 years before he retired so hiring a long time assistant from a declining program didn’t make any sense. So Barnes absolutely was lazy and had one foot out the door.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Aggie in Boise
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: February 15th, 2019, 1:58 pm
- Location: Scranton, PA, My mom's basement
- Has thanked: 1517 times
- Been thanked: 1070 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
At a recent road trip event President Cockett said that when coaches leave for bigger programs the fan base usually becomes a bit disheartened (for example, when Gary left for Wisconsin). However, when Matt Wells left for Texas Tech that wasn't the case. President Cockett said she felt sorry for Coach Wells because as soon as he announced that he was leaving the reaction was "Can we have Gary back now?"NVAggie wrote: ↑June 25th, 2019, 7:48 amHartwell also folded like a tent, but to the big donors, especially Laub. It could work out fine, but I always like to maintain a bit of skepticism. I guess we will see if the big donors are better than former players at hiring.
I will say this, not many were excited about the Duryea hire. Most of Aggie Nation is excited about Gary coming back.
"We've upped our standards, so UP YOURS." Unknown
-
- SJSU Ultimate Loser Award Winner - Given to someone that should probably give up but won't.
- Posts: 23464
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:09 am
- Location: Where the sagebrush grows!
- Has thanked: 1417 times
- Been thanked: 3217 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Wells gets all the credit for last year. That was his team, and he made it happen.
- Aggie in Boise
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: February 15th, 2019, 1:58 pm
- Location: Scranton, PA, My mom's basement
- Has thanked: 1517 times
- Been thanked: 1070 times
-
- Posts: 2457
- Joined: November 15th, 2010, 6:36 pm
- Has thanked: 601 times
- Been thanked: 613 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
We've been over this a million times. Nobody knows for sure what happened with Connor other than Barnes and Connor. But the idea that Barnes courted Connor for weeks and then suddenly decided not to offer him the job because it wasn't a "good fit" seems ridiculous to me. If he thought it wasn't a "good fit," why did it take him a month or two to figure that out? That's something you decide after a telephone screener. The story I heard, which makes far more sense, is that it was about money. Barnes gave Connor a lowball offer. Utah gave him a counteroffer that paid him almost as much as Barnes was offering. He asked for more money and Barnes said no. Maybe Barnes tried to spin it to boosters by saying it was not a "good fit" rather than saying "We were too cheap to offer Connor a competitive salary so we had to go with Duryea." But I simply do not believe that Barnes spend almost two months courting Connor and then decided it was not a "good fit."2004AG wrote: ↑July 2nd, 2019, 11:19 amA lot of fake news there Stanford.
1- Connors did not turn down the job. Barnes didn’t offer it to him. It was Barnes’s who didn’t think it was a good fit. But hey, maybe if you repeat that lie long enough, eventually it will be true.
2- It was 20/20 in that moment when he was hired. Not just in hindsight. About 95% of the people on here knew it was a horrible hire and the other 5% wanted to “wait and see”. It was really obvious Duryea was gonna suck except for Scott Barnes and usufan5477. Stew sucked the last 3-4 years before he retired so hiring a long time assistant from a declining program didn’t make any sense. So Barnes absolutely was lazy and had one foot out the door.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As for Duryea, yeah, pretty much nobody was excited about that hire. But saying it was a bad hire assumes that there was someone better who wanted the job at the salary USU was offering. And I'm not sure who the Barnes critics think we should have hired for $300k per year who would have done a better job than Duryea. (And if you really think Stew "sucked," then I think maybe your expectations for USU basketball aren't very realistic. I think Stew was an amazing coach and we were incredibly lucky to have him for as long as we did even if he did have a few down seasons toward the end of his career.)
- 2004AG
- Posts: 12423
- Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 798 times
- Been thanked: 1601 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
1- well it was straight from Barnes mouth, so I don’t know what to tell you. My version is direct from Barnes and yours it some made up story you invented in your head.StanfordAggie wrote:We've been over this a million times. Nobody knows for sure what happened with Connor other than Barnes and Connor. But the idea that Barnes courted Connor for weeks and then suddenly decided not to offer him the job because it wasn't a "good fit" seems ridiculous to me. If he thought it wasn't a "good fit," why did it take him a month or two to figure that out? That's something you decide after a telephone screener. The story I heard, which makes far more sense, is that it was about money. Barnes gave Connor a lowball offer. Utah gave him a counteroffer that paid him almost as much as Barnes was offering. He asked for more money and Barnes said no. Maybe Barnes tried to spin it to boosters by saying it was not a "good fit" rather than saying "We were too cheap to offer Connor a competitive salary so we had to go with Duryea." But I simply do not believe that Barnes spend almost two months courting Connor and then decided it was not a "good fit."2004AG wrote: ↑July 2nd, 2019, 11:19 amA lot of fake news there Stanford.
1- Connors did not turn down the job. Barnes didn’t offer it to him. It was Barnes’s who didn’t think it was a good fit. But hey, maybe if you repeat that lie long enough, eventually it will be true.
2- It was 20/20 in that moment when he was hired. Not just in hindsight. About 95% of the people on here knew it was a horrible hire and the other 5% wanted to “wait and see”. It was really obvious Duryea was gonna suck except for Scott Barnes and usufan5477. Stew sucked the last 3-4 years before he retired so hiring a long time assistant from a declining program didn’t make any sense. So Barnes absolutely was lazy and had one foot out the door.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As for Duryea, yeah, pretty much nobody was excited about that hire. But saying it was a bad hire assumes that there was someone better who wanted the job at the salary USU was offering. And I'm not sure who the Barnes critics think we should have hired for $300k per year who would have done a better job than Duryea. (And if you really think Stew "sucked," then I think maybe your expectations for USU basketball aren't very realistic. I think Stew was an amazing coach and we were incredibly lucky to have him for as long as we did even if he did have a few down seasons toward the end of his career.)
2- it’s like you are being purposefully obtuse. I never said Stew sucked. I love Stew. I said his last 3-4 years Stew sucked. Stew was burnt out the last 3-4 years. The numbers back me up, not you.
But in a couple months you’ll repeat this same lie and we can rehash it again.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 2457
- Joined: November 15th, 2010, 6:36 pm
- Has thanked: 601 times
- Been thanked: 613 times
Re: Your Best and Worst USU ADs
Once again, what is Barnes supposed to say? "Tommy Connor turned us down because we couldn't offer him enough money and he didn't think he could win here. So we had to go to our third choice candidate. I hope he doesn't suck too much." Of course the AD is going to spin it as not a "good fit" rather than saying that he turned us down. I repeat my question: If Barnes really believed that Connor was not a "good fit," then why did he spend two months trying to convince him to take the job?2004AG wrote: ↑July 5th, 2019, 9:33 am1- well it was straight from Barnes mouth, so I don’t know what to tell you. My version is direct from Barnes and yours it some made up story you invented in your head.
2- it’s like you are being purposefully obtuse. I never said Stew sucked. I love Stew. I said his last 3-4 years Stew sucked. Stew was burnt out the last 3-4 years. The numbers back me up, not you.
But in a couple months you’ll repeat this same lie and we can rehash it again.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk