Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
The T
-
- Posts: 5655
- Joined: August 26th, 2011, 5:21 pm
- Has thanked: 202 times
- Been thanked: 1164 times
The T
I know some say it was warranted and he was sticking up for his guys but you can criticize w/o getting one. It was literally the difference in the score.
Between that and not trying to do something different on Maldonado was a tough one to swallow
Between that and not trying to do something different on Maldonado was a tough one to swallow
-
- Posts: 23314
- Joined: August 22nd, 2011, 2:18 pm
- Has thanked: 7725 times
- Been thanked: 2802 times
Re: The T
It was overdue in my opinion. I've felt like Odom has been pushed around by MWC refs, especially in the CSU game where they refused to foul out Roddy while sending Bean to the bench on a foul he didn't even commit.
He tried different things on Maldanado but it looked like really poor execution; either doubling him far too early in the shot clock, giving him the baseline or looking away and giving up a back door.
He tried different things on Maldanado but it looked like really poor execution; either doubling him far too early in the shot clock, giving him the baseline or looking away and giving up a back door.
- These users thanked the author FloridaAggie13 for the post (total 4):
- 3rdGenAggie • aggiesdidwhat • CastIronAggie • stewusu98
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: January 4th, 2019, 11:27 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: The T
I was actually glad he got the T. Sometimes he seems a little too passive for me.
- These users thanked the author AggieBlueMint for the post (total 4):
- FloridaAggie13 • slcagg • 3rdGenAggie • stewusu98
-
- Posts: 12816
- Joined: November 3rd, 2016, 8:47 pm
- Has thanked: 1285 times
- Been thanked: 2352 times
-
- Posts: 14247
- Joined: December 15th, 2010, 6:29 pm
- Has thanked: 4431 times
- Been thanked: 4073 times
Re: The T
I loved seeing emotion from himAggieBlueMint wrote: ↑January 15th, 2022, 10:12 pmI was actually glad he got the T. Sometimes he seems a little too passive for me.
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: January 8th, 2020, 11:07 am
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Re: The T
Would be nice to have a 2/3 zone in addition to the 1/3/1. Jeffries was the only one hurting us from 3. Would’ve loved to see us pack it in and make them do something else other than post Ike and Maldonado up down the stretch. Sending a double that far out and leaving one defender with Ike and the shooter in the corner was not what I would’ve done.
-
- Posts: 5655
- Joined: August 26th, 2011, 5:21 pm
- Has thanked: 202 times
- Been thanked: 1164 times
Re: The T
No offense but what game were you watching. We were up 2 when he got the T and they went on 7-0 run to go up by 5. In was bone headed and the difference in the game imo.FL350Aggie wrote: ↑January 15th, 2022, 10:10 pmThe game changed after the tech,. Huge momentum swing.
-
- Posts: 9460
- Joined: September 12th, 2018, 2:01 pm
- Has thanked: 2932 times
- Been thanked: 4359 times
Re: The T
He deserved the technical, but he was upset with all the shoulder checking that Ike was doing to initiate contact that they were not calling on him. It sucked because it was big momentum swing. The Aggies were up by 2 and that gave them 4 straight free throws. I have no problem with Odom showing passion, he has been criticized for not being passionate enough, but it was just at a bad time to get a technical.
- These users thanked the author Aggie84025 for the post (total 2):
- FloridaAggie13 • MrBiggle
-
- Posts: 5655
- Joined: August 26th, 2011, 5:21 pm
- Has thanked: 202 times
- Been thanked: 1164 times
Re: The T
Amen!!Aggie84025 wrote: ↑January 15th, 2022, 10:39 pmHe deserved the technical, but he was upset with all the shoulder checking that Ike was doing to initiate contact that they were not calling on him. It sucked because it was big momentum swing. The Aggies were up by 2 and that gave them 4 straight free throws. I have no problem with Odom showing passion, he has been criticized for not being passionate enough, but it was just at a bad time to get a technical.
- Aglicious
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7149
- Joined: January 14th, 2004, 12:00 am
- Location: Vega$
- Has thanked: 934 times
- Been thanked: 2432 times
Re: The T
I think that is what he is saying, a huge momentum swing in favor of the visitors.Elkaggie wrote: ↑January 15th, 2022, 10:39 pmNo offense but what game were you watching. We were up 2 when he got the T and they went on 7-0 run to go up by 5. In was bone headed and the difference in the game imo.FL350Aggie wrote: ↑January 15th, 2022, 10:10 pmThe game changed after the tech,. Huge momentum swing.
-
- Posts: 5655
- Joined: August 26th, 2011, 5:21 pm
- Has thanked: 202 times
- Been thanked: 1164 times
Re: The T
Ok. Gotcha sorry FLAglicious wrote: ↑January 15th, 2022, 10:48 pmI think that is what he is saying, a huge momentum swing in favor of the visitors.Elkaggie wrote: ↑January 15th, 2022, 10:39 pmNo offense but what game were you watching. We were up 2 when he got the T and they went on 7-0 run to go up by 5. In was bone headed and the difference in the game imo.FL350Aggie wrote: ↑January 15th, 2022, 10:10 pmThe game changed after the tech,. Huge momentum swing.
-
- Posts: 969
- Joined: July 14th, 2013, 12:18 pm
- Has thanked: 383 times
- Been thanked: 320 times
Re: The T
The T was needed. Those calls...... It's just not OK. On TV, they didn't touch the guy at all.
We just need to hit a few more of our free shots.... We have a great record if we hit those. I know everyone mentions 3 point shooting. But FREE THROWS being wasted is very bad.
- These users thanked the author aggiesdidwhat for the post:
- FloridaAggie13
-
- Posts: 921
- Joined: January 19th, 2020, 4:57 pm
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 559 times
Re: The T
Yes exactly. The Ags had just battled back from a 6 point hole just 3 and half minutes prior. They had mojo and the Spectrum was on fire. After the Tech they found themselves right back into a 5 point hole.Aglicious wrote: ↑January 15th, 2022, 10:48 pmI think that is what he is saying, a huge momentum swing in favor of the visitors.Elkaggie wrote: ↑January 15th, 2022, 10:39 pmNo offense but what game were you watching. We were up 2 when he got the T and they went on 7-0 run to go up by 5. In was bone headed and the difference in the game imo.FL350Aggie wrote: ↑January 15th, 2022, 10:10 pmThe game changed after the tech,. Huge momentum swing.
-
- Posts: 3525
- Joined: November 5th, 2010, 3:14 pm
- Has thanked: 493 times
- Been thanked: 706 times
Re: The T
Huh? I better check the replay, and the definition of “big momentum swing.” Seems like a big momentum swing would produce more than a 2 or 3 point difference. I could be wrong, but it was a close game all night, and the only thing you could call a momentum swing of any magnitude is the T foul. Had we had any form of a momentum swing, we would have won.
- brownjeans
- Flatulent
- Posts: 18612
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 951 times
- Been thanked: 1739 times
Re: The T
Difference in the score? Yes. Reason we lost? No.
- These users thanked the author brownjeans for the post (total 2):
- 3rdGenAggie • Niccon
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: November 6th, 2010, 1:15 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: The T
I will have to watch the replay to be sure, but I think after the T, Ike got 2 offensive fouls shortly after. They got points from the tech, but getting Ike his 3rd and 4th fouls were really big. I don't know if those would have been called if Odom hadn't gotten on the refs.
- These users thanked the author Aggiefever for the post:
- CastIronAggie
- TrueBlueFan
- Posts: 621
- Joined: August 2nd, 2011, 10:56 pm
- Location: Logan
- Has thanked: 95 times
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: The T
This is true. They finally called it the way it should have been. It sucks he got a technical but the refs were blowing it.Aggiefever wrote: ↑January 16th, 2022, 9:15 amI will have to watch the replay to be sure, but I think after the T, Ike got 2 offensive fouls shortly after. They got points from the tech, but getting Ike his 3rd and 4th fouls were really big. I don't know if those would have been called if Odom hadn't gotten on the refs.
The bigger coaching blunder wasn’t the technical foul, it was the poor offensive play call that had Bean forcing a left-hand, underhand layup around his defender when it was a tied game under a minute left. Followed by the odd call for a double team on Molanado close to the three point line early in the shot clock that left the back door completely open for an easy layup. That put us down by 2 with 38 seconds left.
Go Grizzlies, Jazz, Real SL, Seahawks, USA! Go Aggies!
-
- Posts: 12816
- Joined: November 3rd, 2016, 8:47 pm
- Has thanked: 1285 times
- Been thanked: 2352 times
Re: The T
We were losing by a ton early then the subs then we had the lead.mcaggie1 wrote: ↑January 16th, 2022, 8:18 amHuh? I better check the replay, and the definition of “big momentum swing.” Seems like a big momentum swing would produce more than a 2 or 3 point difference. I could be wrong, but it was a close game all night, and the only thing you could call a momentum swing of any magnitude is the T foul. Had we had any form of a momentum swing, we would have won.
- TheAKAggie
- DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING I SAY
- Posts: 6360
- Joined: February 3rd, 2012, 10:21 pm
- Location: Hyde Park, UT
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 592 times
- Contact:
Re: The T
Yes, but without the T we don’t get Ike’s next two fouls.Elkaggie wrote:I know some say it was warranted and he was sticking up for his guys but you can criticize w/o getting one. It was literally the difference in the score.
Between that and not trying to do something different on Maldonado was a tough one to swallow
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author TheAKAggie for the post:
- USUaggie
Hail Aggies!
-
- Posts: 5655
- Joined: August 26th, 2011, 5:21 pm
- Has thanked: 202 times
- Been thanked: 1164 times
Re: The T
We will never know. But we do know it cost us 2 points.TheAKAggie wrote: ↑January 17th, 2022, 12:17 pmYes, but without the T we don’t get Ike’s next two fouls.Elkaggie wrote:I know some say it was warranted and he was sticking up for his guys but you can criticize w/o getting one. It was literally the difference in the score.
Between that and not trying to do something different on Maldonado was a tough one to swallow
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 10612
- Joined: November 14th, 2010, 11:56 pm
- Has thanked: 353 times
- Been thanked: 3130 times
Re: The T
I think Odom sensed not just the game, but the entire season slipping away at that moment. The frustration of falling short on the season and not having anything to play for may have got the best of him and it boiled over. That, and the fact that his teams seemed to have drawn the short straw on many calls in recent games.
Eutaw St. Aggie
- AggiesForever
- Pick'em Champ - '15 Kickoff
- Posts: 2331
- Joined: January 1st, 1997, 12:00 am
- Has thanked: 1313 times
- Been thanked: 678 times
Re: The T
BTW, can we clear something up here that keeps coming up?
These officials ARE NOT Mountain West officials. They are NCAA officials out of the Western Officiating Consortium, whose members in basketball are the PAC12, MWC, WCC, WAC, Big Sky and Big West. They are assigned games in all the conferences-- can work the PAC 12 one night, the Mountain West the next and the WCC the night after that. They ARE NOT assigned by the Mountain West Conference, per se, though the conference may assist in coordinating them. The referees, themselves, are not bound to reffing games only in the consortium, but can ref all over the country, ala Verne Harris, Dave Ford and many others.
So can people quit complaining about "Mountain West officials?" If you want to complain, you can complain about the "officials assigned to our game by the Western Officiating Consortium." This is also true for football, which belongs to a similar confortium. The conferences don't schedule refs anymore.
These officials ARE NOT Mountain West officials. They are NCAA officials out of the Western Officiating Consortium, whose members in basketball are the PAC12, MWC, WCC, WAC, Big Sky and Big West. They are assigned games in all the conferences-- can work the PAC 12 one night, the Mountain West the next and the WCC the night after that. They ARE NOT assigned by the Mountain West Conference, per se, though the conference may assist in coordinating them. The referees, themselves, are not bound to reffing games only in the consortium, but can ref all over the country, ala Verne Harris, Dave Ford and many others.
So can people quit complaining about "Mountain West officials?" If you want to complain, you can complain about the "officials assigned to our game by the Western Officiating Consortium." This is also true for football, which belongs to a similar confortium. The conferences don't schedule refs anymore.
- TheAKAggie
- DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING I SAY
- Posts: 6360
- Joined: February 3rd, 2012, 10:21 pm
- Location: Hyde Park, UT
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 592 times
- Contact:
Re: The T
I do know though.Elkaggie wrote:We will never know. But we do know it cost us 2 points.TheAKAggie wrote: ↑January 17th, 2022, 12:17 pmYes, but without the T we don’t get Ike’s next two fouls.Elkaggie wrote:I know some say it was warranted and he was sticking up for his guys but you can criticize w/o getting one. It was literally the difference in the score.
Between that and not trying to do something different on Maldonado was a tough one to swallow
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author TheAKAggie for the post:
- Ahbye
Hail Aggies!
-
- Posts: 9128
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:10 am
- Has thanked: 309 times
- Been thanked: 2774 times