NET rankings released

This forum is for Basketball discussion only. Other topics will be moved to the appropriate forum.
Aggiesbleedblue
Posts: 667
Joined: March 4th, 2012, 10:32 pm
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 383 times

NET rankings released

Post by Aggiesbleedblue » January 4th, 2021, 8:40 am

Initial NET rankings are out. We come in at #85. Also of note: San Diego St (41), Colorado St (40), and Boise St (13).
These users thanked the author Aggiesbleedblue for the post (total 5):
flying_scotsman2.0slcaggBank ShotReal Life AggiecdaAg



User avatar
flying_scotsman2.0
Posts: 3451
Joined: January 23rd, 2018, 12:29 pm
Location: The Mighty City-State of Roy, Utah
Has thanked: 5616 times
Been thanked: 2180 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by flying_scotsman2.0 » January 4th, 2021, 9:15 am

Aggiesbleedblue wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 8:40 am
Initial NET rankings are out. We come in at #85. Also of note: San Diego St (41), Colorado St (40), and Boise St (13).
Well, let's keep winning and see what happens



slcagg
Posts: 14097
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 6:29 pm
Has thanked: 4383 times
Been thanked: 4014 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by slcagg » January 4th, 2021, 9:20 am

This is great we have 3 schools in the top 50. That CSU win against SDSU probably really elevated them considering they didn't get much of an OOC and then probably brought SDSU down about 10-15 spots would be my guess. BSU being so high is really good for the conference. We do well against those schools we can get around 50.

Is there a link? Curious where the rest of our conference mates are.



Aggiesbleedblue
Posts: 667
Joined: March 4th, 2012, 10:32 pm
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 383 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by Aggiesbleedblue » January 4th, 2021, 9:33 am

slcagg wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 9:20 am
This is great we have 3 schools in the top 50. That CSU win against SDSU probably really elevated them considering they didn't get much of an OOC and then probably brought SDSU down about 10-15 spots would be my guess. BSU being so high is really good for the conference. We do well against those schools we can get around 50.

Is there a link? Curious where the rest of our conference mates are.
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/basketbal ... t-rankings



UStateTim
Posts: 544
Joined: November 26th, 2013, 7:35 pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 326 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by UStateTim » January 4th, 2021, 10:11 am

If we go 4-2 against those three teams, I’ll be ecstatic.



slcagg
Posts: 14097
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 6:29 pm
Has thanked: 4383 times
Been thanked: 4014 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by slcagg » January 4th, 2021, 10:34 am

We gotta find a way to elevate SJSU. They really hurt our conference rankings.



Yossarian
Posts: 10490
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 11:56 pm
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 3053 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by Yossarian » January 4th, 2021, 10:37 am

slcagg wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 10:34 am
We gotta find a way to elevate SJSU. They really hurt our conference rankings.
USU didn't do the conference any favors losing to VCU, BYU and South Dakota.
These users thanked the author Yossarian for the post:
AggieFBObsession


Eutaw St. Aggie

slcagg
Posts: 14097
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 6:29 pm
Has thanked: 4383 times
Been thanked: 4014 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by slcagg » January 4th, 2021, 10:44 am

Yossarian wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 10:37 am
slcagg wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 10:34 am
We gotta find a way to elevate SJSU. They really hurt our conference rankings.
USU didn't do the conference any favors losing to VCU, BYU and South Dakota.
True. But yet we are still 85th and the 4th team in the conference. We aren’t at 330. BIG difference and impact to the numbers.



User avatar
AGGIEinIOWA
Posts: 3488
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 10:50 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 1628 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by AGGIEinIOWA » January 4th, 2021, 11:02 am

Yossarian wrote:
slcagg wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 10:34 am
We gotta find a way to elevate SJSU. They really hurt our conference rankings.
USU didn't do the conference any favors losing to VCU, BYU and South Dakota.
None of USU’s losses are considered bad losses. VCU is sitting at the top of the A-10, SDSU is in top two of The Summit with some nice wins, and BYU is the best team in Utah (self proclaimed).



OrangeCountyAggie
Posts: 1840
Joined: December 17th, 2018, 12:46 pm
Has thanked: 325 times
Been thanked: 800 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by OrangeCountyAggie » January 4th, 2021, 11:18 am

Don't think it really matters because this team doesn't look like an NCAA tournament team (yet).

But for the sake of argument, let's say we win another 12-14 games and get our Net ranking up into the 40's (at least). We'd still probably be lacking enough quality wins to get an at-large. Is there any chance we could go out and schedule another non-con game or two to replace the ones we lost earlier due to COVID?
Last edited by OrangeCountyAggie on January 4th, 2021, 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These users thanked the author OrangeCountyAggie for the post:
AggieFBObsession



User avatar
SweepDance
Posts: 539
Joined: February 7th, 2011, 12:18 pm
Location: Sandy, UT
Has thanked: 205 times
Been thanked: 236 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by SweepDance » January 4th, 2021, 11:37 am

Glad to see bracketologists.com is back up and updated :) Much easier to use and navigate. Here's the Mountain West:

https://bracketologists.com/conference/MW

I wish they would scrap the different ranges for the quadrants based on home/away/neutral this year or just consider everything neutral. With the lack of fans in most arenas the normal formula doesn't make sense IMO.



slcagg
Posts: 14097
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 6:29 pm
Has thanked: 4383 times
Been thanked: 4014 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by slcagg » January 4th, 2021, 11:41 am

OrangeCountyAggie wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 11:18 am
Don't think it really matters because this team doesn't look like an NCAA tournament team (yet).

But for the sake of the argument, let's say we win another 12-14 games and get our Net ranking up into the 40's (at least). We'd still probably be lacking enough quality wins to get an at-large. Is there any chance we could go out and schedule another non-con game or two to replace the ones we lost earlier due to COVID?
Maybe play st Mary’s if everything aligned.



slcagg
Posts: 14097
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 6:29 pm
Has thanked: 4383 times
Been thanked: 4014 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by slcagg » January 4th, 2021, 11:41 am

SweepDance wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 11:37 am
Glad to see bracketologists.com is back up and updated :) Much easier to use and navigate. Here's the Mountain West:

https://bracketologists.com/conference/MW

I wish they would scrap the different ranges for the quadrants based on home/away/neutral this year or just consider everything neutral. With the lack of fans in most arenas the normal formula doesn't make sense IMO.
But what do you change it to? Just everything neutral?



User avatar
SweepDance
Posts: 539
Joined: February 7th, 2011, 12:18 pm
Location: Sandy, UT
Has thanked: 205 times
Been thanked: 236 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by SweepDance » January 4th, 2021, 11:46 am

slcagg wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 11:41 am
SweepDance wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 11:37 am
Glad to see bracketologists.com is back up and updated :) Much easier to use and navigate. Here's the Mountain West:

https://bracketologists.com/conference/MW

I wish they would scrap the different ranges for the quadrants based on home/away/neutral this year or just consider everything neutral. With the lack of fans in most arenas the normal formula doesn't make sense IMO.
But what do you change it to? Just everything neutral?
I'd be OK with that. Its just doesn't feel right that a home game against the #31 team is Q2 while a road game against the #75 team is Q1 this year.



User avatar
GUS
Posts: 3594
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:04 am
Has thanked: 350 times
Been thanked: 696 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by GUS » January 4th, 2021, 11:53 am

I would say that my other school Drake is way under valued in these rankings. They are 13-0.
Last edited by GUS on January 4th, 2021, 9:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.



User avatar
AGGIEinIOWA
Posts: 3488
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 10:50 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 1628 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by AGGIEinIOWA » January 4th, 2021, 11:58 am

GUS wrote:I would say that my other school Drake is way under valued in these rankings. They are 10-0.
I’m headed to the Drake game tonight with my kids. Lucked out and got some general admission tickets. Should be a great game as they are playing a decent 7-2 Southern Illinois team....although Drake handed them their second loss on Saturday by 18 points.



User avatar
ProvoAggie
Site Admin
Posts: 14936
Joined: June 14th, 2010, 1:00 am
Location: Provo, Utah
Has thanked: 1464 times
Been thanked: 2840 times
Contact:

Re: NET rankings released

Post by ProvoAggie » January 4th, 2021, 12:07 pm

SweepDance wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 11:37 am
Glad to see bracketologists.com is back up and updated :) Much easier to use and navigate. Here's the Mountain West:

https://bracketologists.com/conference/MW

I wish they would scrap the different ranges for the quadrants based on home/away/neutral this year or just consider everything neutral. With the lack of fans in most arenas the normal formula doesn't make sense IMO.
I'm glad to see it's back up now too after someone (I won't point fingers) let the domain name expire.



jpswensen
Posts: 2719
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 6:59 pm
Location: Pullman, WA
Has thanked: 318 times
Been thanked: 651 times
Contact:

Re: NET rankings released

Post by jpswensen » January 4th, 2021, 4:38 pm

I think that the MWC looks in very good shape to be at least a 2 bid conference (maybe they could sneak in a third?).


My side projects:
Internet-connected Aggie A's: www.sports-iot.com
Physics and the Pinewood Derby: www.pinewoodphysics.com

AggiePT
Posts: 683
Joined: August 7th, 2019, 1:41 pm
Has thanked: 1759 times
Been thanked: 546 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by AggiePT » January 4th, 2021, 4:50 pm

Hoping for an at large is like waiting for a girl to ask you out, instead of just going for it and asking yourself. Just win the MWC tourney. Auto bid! Go Aggies!



User avatar
Real Life Aggie
Posts: 3920
Joined: April 10th, 2019, 4:28 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Has thanked: 5004 times
Been thanked: 1776 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by Real Life Aggie » January 4th, 2021, 7:18 pm

ProvoAggie wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 12:07 pm
SweepDance wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 11:37 am
Glad to see bracketologists.com is back up and updated :) Much easier to use and navigate. Here's the Mountain West:

https://bracketologists.com/conference/MW

I wish they would scrap the different ranges for the quadrants based on home/away/neutral this year or just consider everything neutral. With the lack of fans in most arenas the normal formula doesn't make sense IMO.
I'm glad to see it's back up now too after someone (I won't point fingers) let the domain name expire.
Sorry, that's my bad.



User avatar
treesap32
Moderator
Posts: 16777
Joined: July 28th, 2005, 1:00 am
Location: Washington D.C.
Has thanked: 1112 times
Been thanked: 2655 times
Contact:

Re: NET rankings released

Post by treesap32 » January 4th, 2021, 9:55 pm

Image

Click the banner for all the details.



LarryTheAggie
Posts: 2889
Joined: July 4th, 2013, 12:04 pm
Has thanked: 1688 times
Been thanked: 2352 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by LarryTheAggie » January 5th, 2021, 8:34 am

treesap32 wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 9:55 pm
Image

Click the banner for all the details.
That is a humbling graphic. We have lost to every team that us any good and have beat only bad teams... The next few weeks will be interesting.
These users thanked the author LarryTheAggie for the post (total 2):
flying_scotsman2.0Real Life Aggie



Aggie84025
Posts: 9274
Joined: September 12th, 2018, 2:01 pm
Has thanked: 2685 times
Been thanked: 4247 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by Aggie84025 » January 5th, 2021, 9:25 am

LarryTheAggie wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 8:34 am
treesap32 wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 9:55 pm
Image

Click the banner for all the details.
That is a humbling graphic. We have lost to every team that us any good and have beat only bad teams... The next few weeks will be interesting.
It is humbling, but at the same time it was going to take a while for this team to gel. In most normal years we would have scheduled some more winnable games to start the season while in this case we were thrust into some tough games right out of the gate. I do believe the team is playing better. The aggies have just absolutely destroyed the teams in the conference they played. This week and especially next week will tell us if we have made good improvement or it is just fools gold.



cval
Posts: 2151
Joined: December 10th, 2010, 1:32 pm
Has thanked: 700 times
Been thanked: 742 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by cval » January 5th, 2021, 9:45 am

Snapshots are good at ignoring context. That graphic doesn't show the impacts of the COVID disruptions and late arriving players.

Teams don't normally start the year playing top notch opponents like we did.



Yossarian
Posts: 10490
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 11:56 pm
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 3053 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by Yossarian » January 5th, 2021, 1:06 pm

LarryTheAggie wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 8:34 am
treesap32 wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 9:55 pm
Image

Click the banner for all the details.
That is a humbling graphic. We have lost to every team that us any good and have beat only bad teams... The next few weeks will be interesting.

The sad thing is - this team will almost assuredly make the NCAA tournament:

https://bracketologists.com/team/kentucky-wildcats

The deciding factor being that Kentucky's OOC losses were to "hats in the mall" teams, even though the OOC strength of schedule for USU was tougher than that of Kentucky.


Eutaw St. Aggie

Aggie19
Posts: 1615
Joined: November 2nd, 2018, 7:52 am
Has thanked: 1729 times
Been thanked: 1084 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by Aggie19 » January 5th, 2021, 1:29 pm

Yossarian wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 1:06 pm
LarryTheAggie wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 8:34 am
treesap32 wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 9:55 pm
Image

Click the banner for all the details.
That is a humbling graphic. We have lost to every team that us any good and have beat only bad teams... The next few weeks will be interesting.

The sad thing is - this team will almost assuredly make the NCAA tournament:

https://bracketologists.com/team/kentucky-wildcats

The deciding factor being that Kentucky's OOC losses were to "hats in the mall" teams, even though the OOC strength of schedule for USU was tougher than that of Kentucky.
Wouldn't the deciding factor be that they have a much tougher in conference schedule? 14 of their 17 remaining games are Q1 or 2, eleven of them in Q1. They're in a conference that is just opposite of the MWC and what they have to do to make the tourney. Not saying that their name doesn't help, it does, but comparing OOC schedules with them is pointless.


Go Aggies!

Yossarian
Posts: 10490
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 11:56 pm
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 3053 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by Yossarian » January 5th, 2021, 1:39 pm

Aggie19 wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 1:29 pm
Yossarian wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 1:06 pm
LarryTheAggie wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 8:34 am
treesap32 wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 9:55 pm
Image

Click the banner for all the details.
That is a humbling graphic. We have lost to every team that us any good and have beat only bad teams... The next few weeks will be interesting.

The sad thing is - this team will almost assuredly make the NCAA tournament:

https://bracketologists.com/team/kentucky-wildcats

The deciding factor being that Kentucky's OOC losses were to "hats in the mall" teams, even though the OOC strength of schedule for USU was tougher than that of Kentucky.
Wouldn't the deciding factor be that they have a much tougher in conference schedule? 14 of their 17 remaining games are Q1 or 2, eleven of them in Q1. They're in a conference that is just opposite of the MWC and what they have to do to make the tourney. Not saying that their name doesn't help, it does, but comparing OOC schedules with them is pointless.
I agree - Kentucky will have a chance to get more quality wins in conference play. This is why it is so critical for USU to win in the OOC games. USU's at large chances are won or lost in the OOC. Losing the three games the Aggies did pretty much sealed their fate as far as the NCAA tournament goes. They have to win the conference tournament or be left out.
These users thanked the author Yossarian for the post (total 2):
Aggie19Real Life Aggie


Eutaw St. Aggie

User avatar
flying_scotsman2.0
Posts: 3451
Joined: January 23rd, 2018, 12:29 pm
Location: The Mighty City-State of Roy, Utah
Has thanked: 5616 times
Been thanked: 2180 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by flying_scotsman2.0 » January 5th, 2021, 1:41 pm

Yossarian wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 1:39 pm
Aggie19 wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 1:29 pm
Yossarian wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 1:06 pm
LarryTheAggie wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 8:34 am
treesap32 wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 9:55 pm
Image

Click the banner for all the details.
That is a humbling graphic. We have lost to every team that us any good and have beat only bad teams... The next few weeks will be interesting.

The sad thing is - this team will almost assuredly make the NCAA tournament:

https://bracketologists.com/team/kentucky-wildcats

The deciding factor being that Kentucky's OOC losses were to "hats in the mall" teams, even though the OOC strength of schedule for USU was tougher than that of Kentucky.
Wouldn't the deciding factor be that they have a much tougher in conference schedule? 14 of their 17 remaining games are Q1 or 2, eleven of them in Q1. They're in a conference that is just opposite of the MWC and what they have to do to make the tourney. Not saying that their name doesn't help, it does, but comparing OOC schedules with them is pointless.
I agree - Kentucky will have a chance to get more quality wins in conference play. This is why it is so critical for USU to win in the OOC games. USU's at large chances are won or lost in the OOC. Losing the three games the Aggies did pretty much sealed their fate as far as the NCAA tournament goes. They have to win the conference tournament or be left out.
I have a hard time believing we’d be left out if we finished the regular season with 4-5 losses.



Yossarian
Posts: 10490
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 11:56 pm
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 3053 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by Yossarian » January 5th, 2021, 1:52 pm

flying_scotsman2.0 wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 1:41 pm
Yossarian wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 1:39 pm
Aggie19 wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 1:29 pm
Yossarian wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 1:06 pm
LarryTheAggie wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 8:34 am
treesap32 wrote:
January 4th, 2021, 9:55 pm
Image

Click the banner for all the details.
That is a humbling graphic. We have lost to every team that us any good and have beat only bad teams... The next few weeks will be interesting.

The sad thing is - this team will almost assuredly make the NCAA tournament:

https://bracketologists.com/team/kentucky-wildcats

The deciding factor being that Kentucky's OOC losses were to "hats in the mall" teams, even though the OOC strength of schedule for USU was tougher than that of Kentucky.
Wouldn't the deciding factor be that they have a much tougher in conference schedule? 14 of their 17 remaining games are Q1 or 2, eleven of them in Q1. They're in a conference that is just opposite of the MWC and what they have to do to make the tourney. Not saying that their name doesn't help, it does, but comparing OOC schedules with them is pointless.
I agree - Kentucky will have a chance to get more quality wins in conference play. This is why it is so critical for USU to win in the OOC games. USU's at large chances are won or lost in the OOC. Losing the three games the Aggies did pretty much sealed their fate as far as the NCAA tournament goes. They have to win the conference tournament or be left out.
I have a hard time believing we’d be left out if we finished the regular season with 4-5 losses.
At this point, USU has 6 chances remaining to play Q1 (top 50) opponents - assuming CSU (currently at 44) remains a Q1 team. Do you think 4-2 against these teams with the OOC losses we have is enough to get in? That assumes the Aggies run the table in the rest of their games (which is a tall order). I think the Ags must win the MWT to get in.

A win over BYU or VCU could have certainly bought some leeway for a slip-up or two in conference play.


Eutaw St. Aggie

User avatar
ProvoAggie
Site Admin
Posts: 14936
Joined: June 14th, 2010, 1:00 am
Location: Provo, Utah
Has thanked: 1464 times
Been thanked: 2840 times
Contact:

Re: NET rankings released

Post by ProvoAggie » January 5th, 2021, 1:55 pm

Yossarian wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 1:52 pm
At this point, USU has 6 chances remaining to play Q1 (top 50) opponents - assuming CSU (currently at 44) remains a Q1 team. Do you think 4-2 against these teams with the OOC losses we have is enough to get in? That assumes the Aggies run the table in the rest of their games (which is a tall order). I think the Ags must win the MWT to get in.

A win over BYU or VCU could have certainly bought some leeway for a slip-up or two in conference play.
CSU is at home so we'd need them to be top 30 to be Q1. As of right now, Boise State are the only remaining opponent that would be Q1.



Yossarian
Posts: 10490
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 11:56 pm
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 3053 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by Yossarian » January 5th, 2021, 3:09 pm

ProvoAggie wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 1:55 pm
Yossarian wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 1:52 pm
At this point, USU has 6 chances remaining to play Q1 (top 50) opponents - assuming CSU (currently at 44) remains a Q1 team. Do you think 4-2 against these teams with the OOC losses we have is enough to get in? That assumes the Aggies run the table in the rest of their games (which is a tall order). I think the Ags must win the MWT to get in.

A win over BYU or VCU could have certainly bought some leeway for a slip-up or two in conference play.
CSU is at home so we'd need them to be top 30 to be Q1. As of right now, Boise State are the only remaining opponent that would be Q1.
So path becomes even less forgiving for the Aggies. Until the MW shakes that "one bid league" reputation, out of conference victories against quality opponents are a must for any MW team. Last year, the MW was definitely a 2-bid league, but this year could be right back to a single bid - especially if SDSU wins the conference tournament.


Eutaw St. Aggie

slcagg
Posts: 14097
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 6:29 pm
Has thanked: 4383 times
Been thanked: 4014 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by slcagg » January 5th, 2021, 3:10 pm

Boise won’t end up at 13. But if they are anywhere close I’d have to imagine they would get an auto bid if they don’t win out. I also think SDSU has an excellent shot at auto bid beating two of the better pac12 schools.



User avatar
OKAggie
Posts: 3096
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:32 am
Location: Tulsa, OK
Has thanked: 297 times
Been thanked: 956 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by OKAggie » January 5th, 2021, 6:32 pm

slcagg wrote:
January 5th, 2021, 3:10 pm
Boise won’t end up at 13. But if they are anywhere close I’d have to imagine they would get an at large bid if they don’t win out. I also think SDSU has an excellent shot at at large bid beating two of the better pac12 schools.
FIFY
These users thanked the author OKAggie for the post:
slcagg


Nobody here knows anything.

UStateTim
Posts: 544
Joined: November 26th, 2013, 7:35 pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 326 times

Re: NET rankings released

Post by UStateTim » January 6th, 2021, 10:02 pm

After this blowout win vs NM I’m trying to remember what effect margin of victory has on NET rankings. Anyone know?



User avatar
ProvoAggie
Site Admin
Posts: 14936
Joined: June 14th, 2010, 1:00 am
Location: Provo, Utah
Has thanked: 1464 times
Been thanked: 2840 times
Contact:

Re: NET rankings released

Post by ProvoAggie » January 6th, 2021, 10:30 pm

UStateTim wrote:
January 6th, 2021, 10:02 pm
After this blowout win vs NM I’m trying to remember what effect margin of victory has on NET rankings. Anyone know?
Margin of Victory is capped at 10 points so it won't have much of an effect.



Locked Previous topicNext topic