Foul, three shots for the shooter

This forum is for Basketball discussion only. Other topics will be moved to the appropriate forum.
Yossarian
Posts: 3170
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 11:56 pm
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 313 times

Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by Yossarian » March 7th, 2020, 7:53 pm

Image



User avatar
hipsterdoofus21
Posts: 15855
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 9:39 pm
Has thanked: 407 times
Been thanked: 1020 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by hipsterdoofus21 » March 7th, 2020, 7:56 pm

I thought they called him for not giving the shooter a landing zone.

Interesting call given what happened to Merrill on his final shot.
These users thanked the author hipsterdoofus21 for the post (total 6):
TheAKAggieaggies22Aggie_in_Idaho918AGGsneedLiberalAggie



Elkaggie
Posts: 3735
Joined: August 26th, 2011, 5:21 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by Elkaggie » March 7th, 2020, 7:58 pm

Anyone see the play in the first half where Queta stepped out of bounds on a dunk??He was in by at least a foot.
These users thanked the author Elkaggie for the post:
Aggie_in_Idaho



Agzrule
Posts: 799
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:16 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by Agzrule » March 7th, 2020, 8:49 pm

Image
These users thanked the author Agzrule for the post (total 2):
aggies22Aggie_in_Idaho



pilotaggie
Posts: 583
Joined: November 13th, 2010, 6:53 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by pilotaggie » March 7th, 2020, 9:30 pm

It looked like his foot slid right after that. Of course we never saw a replay.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk



This post is likely straight up poor sarcasm and cannot be taken seriously.

Agzrule
Posts: 799
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:16 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by Agzrule » March 7th, 2020, 9:34 pm

Nope replay clearly showed he never got close to baseline, his screen foul was also a total garbage call
These users thanked the author Agzrule for the post (total 2):
aggies22sneed



BigEZ43
Posts: 70
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 9:41 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by BigEZ43 » March 7th, 2020, 9:35 pm

Elkaggie wrote:
March 7th, 2020, 7:58 pm
Anyone see the play in the first half where Queta stepped out of bounds on a dunk??He was in by at least a foot.
I rewound it to watch it again to see if I had missed something because I couldn't believed he called that. It wasn't even close and the camera was on him the whole play until he finished it off. That old guy made two or three really bad calls in my opinion.
These users thanked the author BigEZ43 for the post (total 2):
aggies22Aggie_in_Idaho



NVAggie
SJSU Ultimate Loser Award Winner - Given to someone that should probably give up but won't.
Posts: 16551
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:09 am
Location: Where the sagebrush grows!
Has thanked: 788 times
Been thanked: 697 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by NVAggie » March 7th, 2020, 9:36 pm

Glad we won



Agzrule
Posts: 799
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:16 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by Agzrule » March 7th, 2020, 9:37 pm

Larry Spaulding, he is not a good official
These users thanked the author Agzrule for the post:
aggies22



MetsJetsAggies
Posts: 6328
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 1:39 am
Has thanked: 301 times
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by MetsJetsAggies » March 7th, 2020, 9:49 pm

pilotaggie wrote:
March 7th, 2020, 9:30 pm
It looked like his foot slid right after that. Of course we never saw a replay.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
These users thanked the author MetsJetsAggies for the post (total 3):
aggies22Aggie_in_IdahoReal Life Aggie



NVAggie
SJSU Ultimate Loser Award Winner - Given to someone that should probably give up but won't.
Posts: 16551
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:09 am
Location: Where the sagebrush grows!
Has thanked: 788 times
Been thanked: 697 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by NVAggie » March 7th, 2020, 9:58 pm

That was absolutely awful. Seeing it originally I thought it was a bad call. Now that I see a replay, that was worse than bad. ATROCIOUS.
These users thanked the author NVAggie for the post (total 2):
aggies22Aggie_in_Idaho



User avatar
hipsterdoofus21
Posts: 15855
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 9:39 pm
Has thanked: 407 times
Been thanked: 1020 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by hipsterdoofus21 » March 7th, 2020, 10:59 pm

Agzrule wrote:
March 7th, 2020, 9:34 pm
Nope replay clearly showed he never got close to baseline, his screen foul was also a total garbage call
The screen foul should've been on Porter. He hung his left elbow out and leaned into the defender. Queta didn't do squat.
These users thanked the author hipsterdoofus21 for the post:
aggies22



aggies22
Aggie Insider, Pick'em Champ - '18 Kickoff, '19 Weekly
Posts: 9235
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:17 pm
Location: Smithfield, Utah
Has thanked: 4301 times
Been thanked: 2469 times
Contact:

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by aggies22 » March 7th, 2020, 11:13 pm

It's stuff like this that gives my conspiracy theory legs.
These users thanked the author aggies22 for the post (total 4):
USU78Aggie_in_IdahoFloridaAggie13Real Life Aggie



pilotaggie
Posts: 583
Joined: November 13th, 2010, 6:53 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by pilotaggie » March 8th, 2020, 1:17 am

Yeah that was bad.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk



This post is likely straight up poor sarcasm and cannot be taken seriously.

Murkymerk
Posts: 249
Joined: March 31st, 2015, 10:53 am
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 46 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by Murkymerk » March 8th, 2020, 9:32 am

As far as the OP, yes, it was for not giving the shooter space to land.
As far as bad calls, there was one in the first half where a SDSU player was saving the ball from going out of bounds under our basket. His toes were just inside the line, but it looked like he bounced the ball before tossing to his teammate. I couldn’t see a great angle of it and they didn’t replay it, but I couldn’t figure out how it wasn’t out of bounds. Anyone else remember this play?
These users thanked the author Murkymerk for the post:
MrBiggle



aggies22
Aggie Insider, Pick'em Champ - '18 Kickoff, '19 Weekly
Posts: 9235
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:17 pm
Location: Smithfield, Utah
Has thanked: 4301 times
Been thanked: 2469 times
Contact:

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by aggies22 » March 8th, 2020, 9:35 am

Murkymerk wrote:
March 8th, 2020, 9:32 am
As far as the OP, yes, it was for not giving the shooter space to land.
As far as bad calls, there was one in the first half where a SDSU player was saving the ball from going out of bounds under our basket. His toes were just inside the line, but it looked like he bounced the ball before tossing to his teammate. I couldn’t see a great angle of it and they didn’t replay it, but I couldn’t figure out how it wasn’t out of bounds. Anyone else remember this play?
I do remember what play you are talking about and I thought the exact same thing.



User avatar
918AGG
Posts: 607
Joined: December 20th, 2012, 6:49 pm
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Has thanked: 134 times
Been thanked: 116 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by 918AGG » March 8th, 2020, 10:56 am

In the ref’s defense: Queta’s foot almost touched that hash mark line though.

Wouldn’t that count as being out of bounds as the hash mark line is connected to the baseline?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
These users thanked the author 918AGG for the post:
BustaMcNutt


"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt."

- Bertrand Russell

User avatar
2004AG
Posts: 5994
Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 285 times

Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by 2004AG » March 8th, 2020, 11:09 am

918AGG wrote:In the ref’s defense: Queta’s foot almost touched that hash mark line though.

Wouldn’t that count as being out of bounds as the hash mark line is connected to the baseline?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“Almost” is not the the same thing as actually touching it.

The ref has no defense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



SwaggieAggie
Posts: 114
Joined: September 17th, 2019, 10:04 pm
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 54 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by SwaggieAggie » March 8th, 2020, 11:44 am

I’m really not trying to be a bias fan, but that Neemy call out of bounds and them forgetting what the three point line was in Anderson’s shot when they played BYU were the dumbest mistakes I’ve ever seen an official make.



aggies22
Aggie Insider, Pick'em Champ - '18 Kickoff, '19 Weekly
Posts: 9235
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:17 pm
Location: Smithfield, Utah
Has thanked: 4301 times
Been thanked: 2469 times
Contact:

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by aggies22 » March 8th, 2020, 5:14 pm

Is it a mistake when it's intentional?
These users thanked the author aggies22 for the post (total 2):
USU78Real Life Aggie



WasatchAggie
Posts: 598
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 9:58 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 27 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by WasatchAggie » March 8th, 2020, 6:08 pm

It’s hard to ref and mistakes happen. However, It was clear he wasn’t even close to the line and the ref’s view was unobstructed. Someone at USU ought to send this to the MWC and ask them to review it if for no other reason than training.



User avatar
hipsterdoofus21
Posts: 15855
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 9:39 pm
Has thanked: 407 times
Been thanked: 1020 times

Re: Foul, three shots for the shooter

Post by hipsterdoofus21 » March 8th, 2020, 6:27 pm

WasatchAggie wrote:
March 8th, 2020, 6:08 pm
It’s hard to ref and mistakes happen. However, It was clear he wasn’t even close to the line and the ref’s view was unobstructed. Someone at USU ought to send this to the MWC and ask them to review it if for no other reason than training.
And hopefully banishment
These users thanked the author hipsterdoofus21 for the post:
aggies22



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic