Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
Change to the zone
-
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: November 6th, 2010, 9:04 pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 923 times
Change to the zone
At 9:40, when Sam came back in and the defense switched to a zone, UNM came apart. At that time, Sam had four fouls. Bairstow had four fouls. Queta had 3 fouls (soon to get his fourth). And UNM settled for 10 3-point shots - mostly with the lead. Most of those possessions never challenged the perimeter even though there was a foul trouble advantage. They made 2 of those 10.
By contrast they made 3 of 4 inside the arc.
The only FTs that they shot in the last 9+ minutes was on Queta's tangle with Jackson (the logic of that call is for another discussion).
The zone completely changed the direction of the game.
On the offensive side, the first four minutes after Sam returned weren't stellar - just better than UNM. 2-4 FTs. 2 TOs. 3-8 on 2-point shots and 1-1 on threes. Then things clicked.
The next 8 possessions all produced points. 6-6 FTs. 3-3 2pts. 2-2 3Pts. It was clinical.
Craig Smith won the coaching battle. Weir had no control over trying to answer the run.
By contrast they made 3 of 4 inside the arc.
The only FTs that they shot in the last 9+ minutes was on Queta's tangle with Jackson (the logic of that call is for another discussion).
The zone completely changed the direction of the game.
On the offensive side, the first four minutes after Sam returned weren't stellar - just better than UNM. 2-4 FTs. 2 TOs. 3-8 on 2-point shots and 1-1 on threes. Then things clicked.
The next 8 possessions all produced points. 6-6 FTs. 3-3 2pts. 2-2 3Pts. It was clinical.
Craig Smith won the coaching battle. Weir had no control over trying to answer the run.
- These users thanked the author SectionBAggie for the post:
- sstrasser
- ThunderAggie
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: November 20th, 2017, 7:52 pm
- Location: Logan
- Has thanked: 434 times
- Been thanked: 780 times
-
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: January 26th, 2019, 6:27 pm
- Has thanked: 506 times
- Been thanked: 943 times
Re: Change to the zone
Without reviewing the tape, I felt like Weir was trying to kill some clock around the 5-6 minute mark and that's when they quit attacking. Two coaching decisions went our way.
-
- Posts: 10708
- Joined: November 14th, 2010, 11:56 pm
- Has thanked: 354 times
- Been thanked: 3176 times
Re: Change to the zone
The zone was huge, in more ways than one.
We have tremendous length with that 1-3-1 zone. With 6'8" Bairstow at the top, 6'5" Merrill on one wing, 6'5" Brito on the other, 6'8" Bean in the middle and 7'0" Queta protecting the basket, it makes it difficult to even pass around the zone. That's a lot of long arms getting in the way. Plus Brito, Bean and Bairstow are very active. If a team has a cold spell shooting over the top of the zone (and those shots are usually at least a foot behind the arc), it is difficult to crack.
The other advantage last night was it protected Merrill. In his own words, he was "able to sit in the corner and not do anything". This allowed him to conserve energy and greatly reduce the chance of picking up that fifth foul. Dan Dickou noticed at least two times that Merrill didn't box out on the weak side. His guy got the rebound and put back on one of them and got the rebound and got fouled on the other one. The action was out of the TV screen so I couldn't confirm.
We have tremendous length with that 1-3-1 zone. With 6'8" Bairstow at the top, 6'5" Merrill on one wing, 6'5" Brito on the other, 6'8" Bean in the middle and 7'0" Queta protecting the basket, it makes it difficult to even pass around the zone. That's a lot of long arms getting in the way. Plus Brito, Bean and Bairstow are very active. If a team has a cold spell shooting over the top of the zone (and those shots are usually at least a foot behind the arc), it is difficult to crack.
The other advantage last night was it protected Merrill. In his own words, he was "able to sit in the corner and not do anything". This allowed him to conserve energy and greatly reduce the chance of picking up that fifth foul. Dan Dickou noticed at least two times that Merrill didn't box out on the weak side. His guy got the rebound and put back on one of them and got the rebound and got fouled on the other one. The action was out of the TV screen so I couldn't confirm.
Eutaw St. Aggie
-
- Posts: 23490
- Joined: August 22nd, 2011, 2:18 pm
- Has thanked: 7882 times
- Been thanked: 2842 times
Re: Change to the zone
We also stopped turning the ball over when Merrill returned to the game. UNM was getting cheap points off our turnovers. Even if we weren't making baskets, simply getting the ball into the frontcourt and running offense for 25 seconds and not turning it over killed their momentum.SectionBAggie wrote: ↑March 6th, 2020, 10:44 amAt 9:40, when Sam came back in and the defense switched to a zone, UNM came apart. At that time, Sam had four fouls. Bairstow had four fouls. Queta had 3 fouls (soon to get his fourth). And UNM settled for 10 3-point shots - mostly with the lead. Most of those possessions never challenged the perimeter even though there was a foul trouble advantage. They made 2 of those 10.
By contrast they made 3 of 4 inside the arc.
The only FTs that they shot in the last 9+ minutes was on Queta's tangle with Jackson (the logic of that call is for another discussion).
The zone completely changed the direction of the game.
On the offensive side, the first four minutes after Sam returned weren't stellar - just better than UNM. 2-4 FTs. 2 TOs. 3-8 on 2-point shots and 1-1 on threes. Then things clicked.
The next 8 possessions all produced points. 6-6 FTs. 3-3 2pts. 2-2 3Pts. It was clinical.
Craig Smith won the coaching battle. Weir had no control over trying to answer the run.
Last edited by FloridaAggie13 on March 6th, 2020, 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 10708
- Joined: November 14th, 2010, 11:56 pm
- Has thanked: 354 times
- Been thanked: 3176 times
Re: Change to the zone
While I'm sure you meant UNM, it just has well of been SDSU. There were a couple errant Aggie passes there that wen 3 or 4 rows up into the crowd. They could very well have been caught by SDSU players watching the game.FloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑March 6th, 2020, 12:27 pmWe also stopped turning the ball over when Merrill returned to the game. SDSU was getting cheap points off our turnovers. Even if we weren't making baskets, simply getting the ball into the frontcourt and running offense for 25 seconds and not turning it over killed their momentum.SectionBAggie wrote: ↑March 6th, 2020, 10:44 amAt 9:40, when Sam came back in and the defense switched to a zone, UNM came apart. At that time, Sam had four fouls. Bairstow had four fouls. Queta had 3 fouls (soon to get his fourth). And UNM settled for 10 3-point shots - mostly with the lead. Most of those possessions never challenged the perimeter even though there was a foul trouble advantage. They made 2 of those 10.
By contrast they made 3 of 4 inside the arc.
The only FTs that they shot in the last 9+ minutes was on Queta's tangle with Jackson (the logic of that call is for another discussion).
The zone completely changed the direction of the game.
On the offensive side, the first four minutes after Sam returned weren't stellar - just better than UNM. 2-4 FTs. 2 TOs. 3-8 on 2-point shots and 1-1 on threes. Then things clicked.
The next 8 possessions all produced points. 6-6 FTs. 3-3 2pts. 2-2 3Pts. It was clinical.
Craig Smith won the coaching battle. Weir had no control over trying to answer the run.
- These users thanked the author Yossarian for the post:
- FloridaAggie13
Eutaw St. Aggie
-
- Posts: 23490
- Joined: August 22nd, 2011, 2:18 pm
- Has thanked: 7882 times
- Been thanked: 2842 times
Re: Change to the zone
Thanks! Changed it.Yossarian wrote: ↑March 6th, 2020, 12:37 pmWhile I'm sure you meant UNM, it just has well of been SDSU. There were a couple errant Aggie passes there that wen 3 or 4 rows up into the crowd. They could very well have been caught by SDSU players watching the game.FloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑March 6th, 2020, 12:27 pmWe also stopped turning the ball over when Merrill returned to the game. SDSU was getting cheap points off our turnovers. Even if we weren't making baskets, simply getting the ball into the frontcourt and running offense for 25 seconds and not turning it over killed their momentum.SectionBAggie wrote: ↑March 6th, 2020, 10:44 amAt 9:40, when Sam came back in and the defense switched to a zone, UNM came apart. At that time, Sam had four fouls. Bairstow had four fouls. Queta had 3 fouls (soon to get his fourth). And UNM settled for 10 3-point shots - mostly with the lead. Most of those possessions never challenged the perimeter even though there was a foul trouble advantage. They made 2 of those 10.
By contrast they made 3 of 4 inside the arc.
The only FTs that they shot in the last 9+ minutes was on Queta's tangle with Jackson (the logic of that call is for another discussion).
The zone completely changed the direction of the game.
On the offensive side, the first four minutes after Sam returned weren't stellar - just better than UNM. 2-4 FTs. 2 TOs. 3-8 on 2-point shots and 1-1 on threes. Then things clicked.
The next 8 possessions all produced points. 6-6 FTs. 3-3 2pts. 2-2 3Pts. It was clinical.
Craig Smith won the coaching battle. Weir had no control over trying to answer the run.
I think Brito threw one along the Aggie bench that was so far off target no one even bothered to reach for it.
- BioAggie
- Posts: 599
- Joined: November 17th, 2010, 1:26 pm
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 216 times
Re: Change to the zone
Actually, that is when we started putting a little "token pressure" on them. Something I wish we did more of.
- dyedblue
- Posts: 8446
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 855 times
Re: Change to the zone
Merrill isn’t the only hold over from the Duryea years. We’ve kept the philosophy of watching a run get to double digits before calling a timeout to settle things down. But yeah, the zone helped a lot too.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“The winning team has a dedication. It will have a core of veteran players who set the standards. They will not accept defeat.” --Merlin Olsen