USUFans.com

... our next opponent is likely to be.....the New Mexico Lobos. I'll assume they'll take care of San Jose on Wednesday.

We won't lose to them again.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

I will be cheering for SJSU as we match up better against them. What is really frustrating is I have watched the last 4 games that NM has played. They flat out quit in a lot of those games. Then they play us and they play like this. Cut down our turnovers and we should win. Get the ball into Queta, but he need to go up quicker, there were several times we lobbed it over the defender and rather than just going straight up he waited for the double team which led to issues. Don't get me wrong Queta played really solid in the game and is for sure not the reason we lost.

We are all SJSU fans in that 10/7 game

Queta had 8 turnovers. That was a huge factor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We will win by 20 or more if we play them again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Usu0505 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 6:44 am

We will win by 20 or more if we play them again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We show an amazing amount of arrogance for a team with eight losses including several blown leads.

UNM isn't a good match-up for us with their athleticism. We scored ten points in the final eleven minutes of Saturday's game.

dyedblue wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 5:07 am

Queta had 8 turnovers. That was a huge factor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Queta drops his hands down too low after catching the pass instead of keeping them higher and moving right to the basket.

bigblue wrote: ↑

February 29th, 2020, 10:27 pm

We won't lose to them again.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

No way. It was a perfect storm of senior night, out of the ordinary good 3-point shooting and Dave Hall.

89Aggie wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:38 am

dyedblue wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 5:07 am

Queta had 8 turnovers. That was a huge factor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Queta drops his hands down too low after catching the pass instead of keeping them higher and moving right to the basket.

Exactly. Neemias completely negates being 7 feet tall when he brings the ball down to his waist.

89Aggie wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:38 am

dyedblue wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 5:07 am

Queta had 8 turnovers. That was a huge factor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Queta drops his hands down too low after catching the pass instead of keeping them higher and moving right to the basket.

All of our big men do it. Over and over

What about line ups - any blame for blowing big leads rests on coaching? I think there is a pattern with our loses and lack of substitutions.

Aggie19 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:47 am

89Aggie wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:38 am

dyedblue wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 5:07 am

Queta had 8 turnovers. That was a huge factor.

Queta drops his hands down too low after catching the pass instead of keeping them higher and moving right to the basket.

All of our big men do it. Over and over

This.

And can we stop bringing the ball back when we go to dunk? Just put it in, stop going for the dramatic throwdown - it's just helping the defender block it.

Chupamedia wrote:What about line ups - any blame for blowing big leads rests on coaching? I think there is a pattern with our loses and lack of substitutions.

Yes. Absolutely.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

89Aggie wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:38 am

dyedblue wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 5:07 am

Queta had 8 turnovers. That was a huge factor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Queta drops his hands down too low after catching the pass instead of keeping them higher and moving right to the basket.

We threw the ball over the top of the defender really well. Rather than just catch and go up with the ball he seemed a little hesitant when they brought 2 other defenders. He also brought the ball down low. Had he kept the ball high and went directly up with it I would guess he would have made 2-3 more baskets in the paint. If we play them on Thursday we need to fix that.

-need to rebound better. They had several offensive rebounds that killed us.
-limit the turnovers and especially fast break turnovers.
-All 5 players will shoot the 3 for NM, we need to make sure we guard the 3 closer.

brownjeans wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 8:48 am

Aggie19 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:47 am

89Aggie wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:38 am

dyedblue wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 5:07 am

Queta had 8 turnovers. That was a huge factor.

Queta drops his hands down too low after catching the pass instead of keeping them higher and moving right to the basket.

All of our big men do it. Over and over

This.

And can we stop bringing the ball back when we go to dunk? Just put it in, stop going for the dramatic throwdown - it's just helping the defender block it.

Or just make the simple layup instead of highlight reel. We had a few fast break or open lanes to the rim where we tried to make a highlight play instead of just a regular 2 point play.

FloridaAggie13 wrote:

Usu0505 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 6:44 am

We will win by 20 or more if we play them again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We show an amazing amount of arrogance for a team with eight losses including several blown leads.

UNM isn't a good match-up for us with their athleticism. We scored ten points in the final eleven minutes of Saturday's game.

Whatever you say bud.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:21 am

Usu0505 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 6:44 am

We will win by 20 or more if we play them again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We show an amazing amount of arrogance for a team with eight losses including several blown leads.

UNM isn't a good match-up for us with their athleticism. We scored ten points in the final eleven minutes of Saturday's game.

While I don't think we win by 20, the game against them in the pit was an anomaly in many ways. They shot well above both their season average for makes and total attempts from 3. We turned it over more than we usually do. I am not that worried about another matchup against them. They have zero answer for Queta. As long as he can hold the ball, we should handle bizzness.

Madmartigan wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 1:57 pm

FloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:21 am

Usu0505 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 6:44 am

We will win by 20 or more if we play them again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We show an amazing amount of arrogance for a team with eight losses including several blown leads.

UNM isn't a good match-up for us with their athleticism. We scored ten points in the final eleven minutes of Saturday's game.

While I don't think we win by 20, the game against them in the pit was an anomaly in many ways. They shot well above both their season average for makes and total attempts from 3. We turned it over more than we usually do. I am not that worried about another matchup against them. They have zero answer for Queta. As long as he can hold the ball, we should handle bizzness.

I haven't watched the game yet (it's on the docket for this evening). But 8 turnovers certainly sounds like they have a bit of an answer for Queta.

Real Life Aggie wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 2:06 pm

Madmartigan wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 1:57 pm

FloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:21 am

Usu0505 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 6:44 am

We will win by 20 or more if we play them again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We show an amazing amount of arrogance for a team with eight losses including several blown leads.

UNM isn't a good match-up for us with their athleticism. We scored ten points in the final eleven minutes of Saturday's game.

While I don't think we win by 20, the game against them in the pit was an anomaly in many ways. They shot well above both their season average for makes and total attempts from 3. We turned it over more than we usually do. I am not that worried about another matchup against them. They have zero answer for Queta. As long as he can hold the ball, we should handle bizzness.

I haven't watched the game yet (it's on the docket for this evening). But 8 turnovers certainly sounds like they have a bit of an answer for Queta.

Touche, I should clarify. Zero answer for a Queta that is not careless with the ball.

Real Life Aggie wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 2:06 pm

Madmartigan wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 1:57 pm

FloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:21 am

Usu0505 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 6:44 am

We will win by 20 or more if we play them again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We show an amazing amount of arrogance for a team with eight losses including several blown leads.

UNM isn't a good match-up for us with their athleticism. We scored ten points in the final eleven minutes of Saturday's game.

While I don't think we win by 20, the game against them in the pit was an anomaly in many ways. They shot well above both their season average for makes and total attempts from 3. We turned it over more than we usually do. I am not that worried about another matchup against them. They have zero answer for Queta. As long as he can hold the ball, we should handle bizzness.

I haven't watched the game yet (it's on the docket for this evening). But 8 turnovers certainly sounds like they have a bit of an answer for Queta.

One turnover was a bullet pass from Brito in traffic from 10 feet away, another was a total flop by the defender as Queta posted up, and a third was a crap over the back call on a put back. Those are 3 of the 8 that I can excuse him for. I'm not sure of the other 5.

Madmartigan wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 1:57 pm

FloridaAggie13 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:21 am

Usu0505 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 6:44 am

We will win by 20 or more if we play them again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We show an amazing amount of arrogance for a team with eight losses including several blown leads.

UNM isn't a good match-up for us with their athleticism. We scored ten points in the final eleven minutes of Saturday's game.

While I don't think we win by 20, the game against them in the pit was an anomaly in many ways. They shot well above both their season average for makes and total attempts from 3. We turned it over more than we usually do. I am not that worried about another matchup against them. They have zero answer for Queta. As long as he can hold the ball, we should handle bizzness.

I definitely think we are a better team overall and we should win 7/10 against them. But it is the classic situation where as matchups are concerned we struggle due to their athleticism and I just don't think we are in a position to claim we are going to beat anyone by 20, especially a team that just beat us while going on a 28-10 run over the last 11 minutes of the game.

aggies22 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:43 am

bigblue wrote: ↑

February 29th, 2020, 10:27 pm

We won't lose to them again.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

No way. It was a perfect storm of senior night, out of the ordinary good 3-point shooting and Dave Hall.

WIll Dave (I can't express myself without swearing) (I can't express myself without swearing) (I can't express myself without swearing) (I can't express myself without swearing) (I can't express myself without swearing) (I can't express myself without swearing) Hall be reffing at the MWC tournament?

jpswensen wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 4:42 pm

aggies22 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 7:43 am

bigblue wrote: ↑

February 29th, 2020, 10:27 pm

We won't lose to them again.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

No way. It was a perfect storm of senior night, out of the ordinary good 3-point shooting and Dave Hall.

WIll Dave (I can't express myself without swearing) (I can't express myself without swearing) (I can't express myself without swearing) (I can't express myself without swearing) (I can't express myself without swearing) (I can't express myself without swearing) Hall be reffing at the MWC tournament?

I would (I can't express myself without swearing) imagine so. In the event we make the Championship game, pencil him in.

Hopefully he works the Power conference game at the Orleans.

NVAggie wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 6:21 pm

Hopefully he works the Power conference game at the Orleans.

Good point. Only the best for the best.

FloridaAggie13 wrote:

Usu0505 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 6:44 am

We will win by 20 or more if we play them again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We show an amazing amount of arrogance for a team with eight losses including several blown leads.

UNM isn't a good match-up for us with their athleticism. We scored ten points in the final eleven minutes of Saturday's game.

I can admit when wrong was hoping we’d come out pissed off like the rest of us after losing. Didn’t win by 20 but won and they are a good team. Reffing was also atrocious. I think we win by at least 10 with queta and Sam not in foul trouble.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Usu0505 wrote: ↑

March 5th, 2020, 9:40 pm

FloridaAggie13 wrote:

Usu0505 wrote: ↑

March 2nd, 2020, 6:44 am

We will win by 20 or more if we play them again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We show an amazing amount of arrogance for a team with eight losses including several blown leads.

UNM isn't a good match-up for us with their athleticism. We scored ten points in the final eleven minutes of Saturday's game.

I can admit when wrong was hoping we’d come out pissed off like the rest of us after losing. Didn’t win by 20 but won and they are a good team. Reffing was also atrocious. I think we win by at least 10 with queta and Sam not in foul trouble.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh, no problem. I didn't take any offense to your statement. UNM is a difficult matchup due to their athleticism - they used five guard lineups often in fact

bigblue wrote:We won't lose to them again.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Man, I'm glad I'm right haha.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

aggies22 wrote:

bigblue wrote: ↑

February 29th, 2020, 10:27 pm

We won't lose to them again.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

No way. It was a perfect storm of senior night, out of the ordinary good 3-point shooting and Dave Hall.

Who would have thought we would have had a worst officiating game than one with Dave Hall?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

bigblue wrote:

aggies22 wrote:

bigblue wrote: ↑

February 29th, 2020, 10:27 pm

We won't lose to them again.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

No way. It was a perfect storm of senior night, out of the ordinary good 3-point shooting and Dave Hall.

Who would have thought we would have had a worst officiating game than one with Dave Hall?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Don’t worry. We could still get Larry Spaulding tomorrow


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk