When the 6'5 275 player is "athletic" and the 6'5 190 player is "not," and the former slams into the latter on the upper left wing, spinning him around, causing him to nearly turn the ball over, it's because of tautology and laziness that no foul is called. The"athletic" former is presumed, perhaps unconsciously, to be so highly skilled by a lazy observer not to have caused the bruising dust up of the "not," but rather his own unskilled, clumsy feet.
Tautology and laziness.
I believe what the roster say's about Mitchel's weight instead of eye ball guesses by less than neutral observer's . He is listed at 6'6" 240 lbs. When I look at the weight of several USU players it is clear they need serous weight gain to play at this level one is so skinny just by looking at him you can tell what he had for breakfast.
We lost this game because we could not hit open shoots in the second half, and we gave up 49 points in the second half.
When the 6'5 275 player is "athletic" and the 6'5 190 player is "not," and the former slams into the latter on the upper left wing, spinning him around, causing him to nearly turn the ball over, it's because of tautology and laziness that no foul is called. The"athletic" former is presumed, perhaps unconsciously, to be so highly skilled by a lazy observer not to have caused the bruising dust up of the "not," but rather his own unskilled, clumsy feet.
Tautology and laziness.
I believe what the roster say's about Mitchel's weight instead of eye ball guesses by less than neutral observer's . He is listed at 6'6" 240 lbs. When I look at the weight of several USU players it is clear they need serous weight gain to play at this level one is so skinny just by looking at him you can tell what he had for breakfast.
We lost this game because we could not hit open shoots in the second half, and we gave up 49 points in the second half.
When the 6'5 275 player is "athletic" and the 6'5 190 player is "not," and the former slams into the latter on the upper left wing, spinning him around, causing him to nearly turn the ball over, it's because of tautology and laziness that no foul is called. The"athletic" former is presumed, perhaps unconsciously, to be so highly skilled by a lazy observer not to have caused the bruising dust up of the "not," but rather his own unskilled, clumsy feet.
Tautology and laziness.
I believe what the roster say's about Mitchel's weight instead of eye ball guesses by less than neutral observer's . He is listed at 6'6" 240 lbs. When I look at the weight of several USU players it is clear they need serous weight gain to play at this level one is so skinny just by looking at him you can tell what he had for breakfast.
We lost this game because we could not hit open shoots in the second half, and we gave up 49 points in the second half.
He’s 240 from the waist down. Not buying it.
If his weight is that important to you folks ok. Fat or not he kicked us pretty good in Logan, and again last night. When I look at someone I can not tell what the weigh is
When the 6'5 275 player is "athletic" and the 6'5 190 player is "not," and the former slams into the latter on the upper left wing, spinning him around, causing him to nearly turn the ball over, it's because of tautology and laziness that no foul is called. The"athletic" former is presumed, perhaps unconsciously, to be so highly skilled by a lazy observer not to have caused the bruising dust up of the "not," but rather his own unskilled, clumsy feet.
Tautology and laziness.
I believe what the roster say's about Mitchel's weight instead of eye ball guesses by less than neutral observer's . He is listed at 6'6" 240 lbs. When I look at the weight of several USU players it is clear they need serous weight gain to play at this level one is so skinny just by looking at him you can tell what he had for breakfast.
We lost this game because we could not hit open shoots in the second half, and we gave up 49 points in the second half.
He’s 240 from the waist down. Not buying it.
If his weight is that important to you folks ok. Fat or not he kicked us pretty good in Logan, and again last night. When I look at someone I can not tell what the weigh is
He’s talented. He went off in both games this year. He’s a tough match up for us because as Coach put it and the announcers put it “he’s a load” which is polite for “Lard Butt”. And he’s especially a load when he’s allowed to throw that “athleticism” around and if a foul is called it’s on the defense.
But He only averages 11 pts per game normally so let’s not crown him the next Glen Davis, Charles Barkley or Oliver Miller just yet.
When the 6'5 275 player is "athletic" and the 6'5 190 player is "not," and the former slams into the latter on the upper left wing, spinning him around, causing him to nearly turn the ball over, it's because of tautology and laziness that no foul is called. The"athletic" former is presumed, perhaps unconsciously, to be so highly skilled by a lazy observer not to have caused the bruising dust up of the "not," but rather his own unskilled, clumsy feet.
Tautology and laziness.
I believe what the roster say's about Mitchel's weight instead of eye ball guesses by less than neutral observer's . He is listed at 6'6" 240 lbs. When I look at the weight of several USU players it is clear they need serous weight gain to play at this level one is so skinny just by looking at him you can tell what he had for breakfast.
We lost this game because we could not hit open shoots in the second half, and we gave up 49 points in the second half.
You're quibbling.
Re: We need a fat 6'5 275 player
Posted: February 2nd, 2020, 2:17 pm
by Blitz79
Clearly he doesn't have to be Barkley for him to be a problem. Take away the two plays where he might have fouled and they still beat us.
The guy lost a ton of weight in the last year and is a good player. May we should have Grootfam on him, oh wait, Mitchell is still a better player.
When the 6'5 275 player is "athletic" and the 6'5 190 player is "not," and the former slams into the latter on the upper left wing, spinning him around, causing him to nearly turn the ball over, it's because of tautology and laziness that no foul is called. The"athletic" former is presumed, perhaps unconsciously, to be so highly skilled by a lazy observer not to have caused the bruising dust up of the "not," but rather his own unskilled, clumsy feet.
Tautology and laziness.
I believe what the roster say's about Mitchel's weight instead of eye ball guesses by less than neutral observer's . He is listed at 6'6" 240 lbs. When I look at the weight of several USU players it is clear they need serous weight gain to play at this level one is so skinny just by looking at him you can tell what he had for breakfast.
We lost this game because we could not hit open shoots in the second half, and we gave up 49 points in the second half.
You're quibbling.
I'm quibbling, but those that post about losing a game because of a fat player and biased ref's are just pointing out proven facts. I believe I know who is quibbling try looking in the mirror.
When the 6'5 275 player is "athletic" and the 6'5 190 player is "not," and the former slams into the latter on the upper left wing, spinning him around, causing him to nearly turn the ball over, it's because of tautology and laziness that no foul is called. The"athletic" former is presumed, perhaps unconsciously, to be so highly skilled by a lazy observer not to have caused the bruising dust up of the "not," but rather his own unskilled, clumsy feet.
Tautology and laziness.
I believe what the roster say's about Mitchel's weight instead of eye ball guesses by less than neutral observer's . He is listed at 6'6" 240 lbs. When I look at the weight of several USU players it is clear they need serous weight gain to play at this level one is so skinny just by looking at him you can tell what he had for breakfast.
We lost this game because we could not hit open shoots in the second half, and we gave up 49 points in the second half.
You're quibbling.
I'm quibbling, but those that post about losing a game because of a fat player and biased ref's are just pointing out proven facts. I believe I know who is quibbling try looking in the mirror.
You really shouldn't carry your phone into the bathroom.
Re: We need a fat 6'5 275 player
Posted: February 2nd, 2020, 2:24 pm
by hipsterdoofus21
We didn’t lose just because of Doublewide. They have lots of good players. And our players aren’t very good outside of 3 of them. We’ve harped on our own players for weeks so naturally we gravitate to another large matter.
When the 6'5 275 player is "athletic" and the 6'5 190 player is "not," and the former slams into the latter on the upper left wing, spinning him around, causing him to nearly turn the ball over, it's because of tautology and laziness that no foul is called. The"athletic" former is presumed, perhaps unconsciously, to be so highly skilled by a lazy observer not to have caused the bruising dust up of the "not," but rather his own unskilled, clumsy feet.
Tautology and laziness.
I believe what the roster say's about Mitchel's weight instead of eye ball guesses by less than neutral observer's . He is listed at 6'6" 240 lbs. When I look at the weight of several USU players it is clear they need serous weight gain to play at this level one is so skinny just by looking at him you can tell what he had for breakfast.
We lost this game because we could not hit open shoots in the second half, and we gave up 49 points in the second half.
You're quibbling.
I'm quibbling, but those that post about losing a game because of a fat player and biased ref's are just pointing out proven facts. I believe I know who is quibbling try looking in the mirror.
You really shouldn't carry your phone into the bathroom.
I do not take a phone into the bathroom, but when I do look in the mirror I see someone that believes that USU can lose a game because the other team is just better, which is a hard concept for some. I also see a fat lard butt.so get the hell off my lawn.
Re: We need a fat 6'5 275 player
Posted: February 2nd, 2020, 2:43 pm
by dyedblue
All I know is that Mitchell kicked our butt last night. He looks thinner than last year and has elevated his game. Good for him. Put him at the three next to Merrill and we are unstoppable.
Oleblue, if we have Miller some more money would we get better results?
When the 6'5 275 player is "athletic" and the 6'5 190 player is "not," and the former slams into the latter on the upper left wing, spinning him around, causing him to nearly turn the ball over, it's because of tautology and laziness that no foul is called. The"athletic" former is presumed, perhaps unconsciously, to be so highly skilled by a lazy observer not to have caused the bruising dust up of the "not," but rather his own unskilled, clumsy feet.
Tautology and laziness.
I believe what the roster say's about Mitchel's weight instead of eye ball guesses by less than neutral observer's . He is listed at 6'6" 240 lbs. When I look at the weight of several USU players it is clear they need serous weight gain to play at this level one is so skinny just by looking at him you can tell what he had for breakfast.
We lost this game because we could not hit open shoots in the second half, and we gave up 49 points in the second half.
You're quibbling.
I'm quibbling, but those that post about losing a game because of a fat player and biased ref's are just pointing out proven facts. I believe I know who is quibbling try looking in the mirror.
You really shouldn't carry your phone into the bathroom.
I do not take a phone into the bathroom, but when I do look in the mirror I see someone that believes that USU can lose a game because the other team is just better, which is a hard concept for some. I also see a fat lard butt.so get the hell off my lawn.
Pax, brother! Pax! People b!tch and moan after a disappointing loss. Nothing more serious than that going on. Means we've got a pulse, and that's a very good thing. Wasn't that long ago we didn't.
All I know is that Mitchell kicked our butt last night. He looks thinner than last year and has elevated his game. Good for him. Put him at the three next to Merrill and we are unstoppable.
Oleblue, if we have Miller some more money would we get better results?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If we had a $100 million dollar budget I would hope we would do a lot better, However we still may have lost last night.
When the 6'5 275 player is "athletic" and the 6'5 190 player is "not," and the former slams into the latter on the upper left wing, spinning him around, causing him to nearly turn the ball over, it's because of tautology and laziness that no foul is called. The"athletic" former is presumed, perhaps unconsciously, to be so highly skilled by a lazy observer not to have caused the bruising dust up of the "not," but rather his own unskilled, clumsy feet.
Tautology and laziness.
I believe what the roster say's about Mitchel's weight instead of eye ball guesses by less than neutral observer's . He is listed at 6'6" 240 lbs. When I look at the weight of several USU players it is clear they need serous weight gain to play at this level one is so skinny just by looking at him you can tell what he had for breakfast.
We lost this game because we could not hit open shoots in the second half, and we gave up 49 points in the second half.
You're quibbling.
I'm quibbling, but those that post about losing a game because of a fat player and biased ref's are just pointing out proven facts. I believe I know who is quibbling try looking in the mirror.
You really shouldn't carry your phone into the bathroom.
I do not take a phone into the bathroom, but when I do look in the mirror I see someone that believes that USU can lose a game because the other team is just better, which is a hard concept for some. I also see a fat lard butt.so get the hell off my lawn.
Pax, brother! Pax! People b!tch and moan after a disappointing loss. Nothing more serious than that going on. Means we've got a pulse, and that's a very good thing. Wasn't that long ago we didn't.
I come in peace with documents on how to lose with grace, however I do understand the passion from fans which is of course a short name for fanatics.
Re: We need a fat 6'5 275 player
Posted: February 2nd, 2020, 4:16 pm
by GUS
Mitchell is a hell of a player. I'd love to have him on my team. But I noticed that once he got away with pushing Bean all over the place with no calls, Bean disappeared from the rest of the game and Mitchell really got it going. That's how reffing can affect games. The refs don't make or miss baskets, but their calls can change a teams style of play which may end up favoring a team. USU under Smith has never been a quick physical team, but that's the type of game that was allowed last night. I still believe that on a neutral floor with different style of reffing, USU has a chance to beat SDSU. Props to SDSU for winning again last night. I love it when USU wins and hate it when USU loses. I hope that's how we all feel in the end.
Mitchell is a hell of a player. I'd love to have him on my team. But I noticed that once he got away with pushing Bean all over the place with no calls, Bean disappeared from the rest of the game and Mitchell really got it going. That's how reffing can affect games. The refs don't make or miss baskets, but their calls can change a teams style of play which may end up favoring a team. USU under Smith has never been a quick physical team, but that's the type of game that was allowed last night. I still believe that on a neutral floor with different style of reffing, USU has a chance to beat SDSU. Props to SDSU for winning again last night. I love it when USU wins and hate it when USU loses. I hope that's how we all feel in the end.
Perhaps if we start winning games we could meet them in Vegas for the conference tourny championship. I hope we do, but we need to pick it up a lot before then.
Re: We need a fat 6'5 275 player
Posted: February 2nd, 2020, 6:21 pm
by GUS
I think there is more than a puncher's chance that it happens. I like the Aggies chances for the rest of the regular conference schedule.
Re: We need a fat 6'5 275 player
Posted: February 3rd, 2020, 8:16 am
by Aggie in Boise
I'd be happy to have a morbidly obese 6'5" 275 pound player, if he can play like Mitchell.
Mitchell lost weight but is still obese and out of shape. When a guy the size of Mitchell loses 40 pounds it's like taking a cup of water out of the ocean. If Mitchell could get his body fat percentage under 10%, like most collegiate basketball players, he would be scary good.
I literally registered to this site to compliment they way you are completely body shaming a guy that owned you, your home, and your car last night. Congrats.
I literally registered to this site to compliment they way you are completely body shaming a guy that owned you, your home, and your car last night. Congrats.
I literally registered to this site to compliment they way you are completely body shaming a guy that owned you, your home, and your car last night. Congrats.
Sincerely,
Alie
SDSU Class ‘09
23-0!!!!
First of all he didn’t own our home cause we were playing in your arena. Second of all, literally one person body shamed him, the guy who started this thread. If you read through the posts, almost everybody complimented the way he played and said how they would love to have a guy like him on our team. But fact is that he is a little large bodied. That is just a fact, not body shaming.
And congrats on being “23-0”, but be lucky you guys have a mountain west schedule. You got a good team, but there are reasons P5 teams hardly ever go undefeated.
Re: We need a fat 6'5 275 player
Posted: February 3rd, 2020, 10:52 am
by BigBlueDart
This whole thread is dumb.
Re: We need a fat 6'5 275 player
Posted: February 3rd, 2020, 11:05 am
by treesap32
Refs made some questionable calls (and non-calls). Didn't influence the outcome of the game. SDSU was the better team once again. Mitchell has some serious junk in the trunk. If basketball doesn't work out he could probably look into a professional twerking gig. (Sorry Karen) Props to him for working out dropping some pounds in the off-season. It's obviously made him better. He's the main reason they came back and beat us on Saturday.
Hopefully we get a third shot at SDSU in the MW Tourney championship. Should be a great game if it happens.
I literally registered to this site to compliment they way you are completely body shaming a guy that owned you, your home, and your car last night. Congrats.
The refs and the Conference aren't going to let San Diego State lose on Kawhi night. But watch how horrible the reffing is against us on Wayne Estes night in a week.
I'd be happy to have a morbidly obese 6'5" 275 pound player, if he can play like Mitchell.
Mitchell lost weight but is still obese and out of shape. When a guy the size of Mitchell loses 40 pounds it's like taking a cup of water out of the ocean. If Mitchell could get his body fat percentage under 10%, like most collegiate basketball players, he would be scary good.
Is 6’5” 275 in the morbidly obese range? Asking for a friend, and not at all because I may or may not be the 6’2” version of that.
I'd be happy to have a morbidly obese 6'5" 275 pound player, if he can play like Mitchell.
Mitchell lost weight but is still obese and out of shape. When a guy the size of Mitchell loses 40 pounds it's like taking a cup of water out of the ocean. If Mitchell could get his body fat percentage under 10%, like most collegiate basketball players, he would be scary good.
Is 6’5” 275 in the morbidly obese range? Asking for a friend, and not at all because I may or may not be the 6’2” version of that.
No, it falls in the extremely jacked range. Tell your friend not to worry because he or she is in good company since JJ Watts is in the 280ish range.
The biggest call of the game was the Flopping warning against bean after that bulldozing. After that Bean was afraid to try and draw a charge and Fatt Mitchell was free to bulldoze away.
Look who's calling who FAT lol What are you, pushing like 280??
The biggest call of the game was the Flopping warning against bean after that bulldozing. After that Bean was afraid to try and draw a charge and Fatt Mitchell was free to bulldoze away.
Look who's calling who FAT lol What are you, pushing like 280??
Oh sorry, I thought it was clear. I was calling Matt Mitchell fat. In fact it was the whole theme of the thread.
The biggest call of the game was the Flopping warning against bean after that bulldozing. After that Bean was afraid to try and draw a charge and Fatt Mitchell was free to bulldoze away.
Look who's calling who FAT lol What are you, pushing like 280??
Oh sorry, I thought it was clear. I was calling Matt Mitchell fat. In fact it was the whole theme of the thread.
These people still come by here nearly two weeks after we last played and there isn't even a guarantee that we'll even play them again this year.
The biggest call of the game was the Flopping warning against bean after that bulldozing. After that Bean was afraid to try and draw a charge and Fatt Mitchell was free to bulldoze away.
Look who's calling who FAT lol What are you, pushing like 280??
Oh sorry, I thought it was clear. I was calling Matt Mitchell fat. In fact it was the whole theme of the thread.
These people still come by here nearly two weeks after we last played and there isn't even a guarantee that we'll even play them again this year.
The biggest call of the game was the Flopping warning against bean after that bulldozing. After that Bean was afraid to try and draw a charge and Fatt Mitchell was free to bulldoze away.
Look who's calling who FAT lol What are you, pushing like 280??
That was really impressive ESPECIALLY for a guy with that body type. I can only imagine what he could do if he was built differently.
I'd be happy to have a morbidly obese 6'5" 275 pound player, if he can play like Mitchell.
Mitchell lost weight but is still obese and out of shape. When a guy the size of Mitchell loses 40 pounds it's like taking a cup of water out of the ocean. If Mitchell could get his body fat percentage under 10%, like most collegiate basketball players, he would be scary good.
Is 6’5” 275 in the morbidly obese range? Asking for a friend, and not at all because I may or may not be the 6’2” version of that.
No, it falls in the extremely jacked range. Tell your friend not to worry because he or she is in good company since JJ Watts is in the 280ish range.
