PAC 12 update

This forum is for Football related topics only. Other topics will be moved to the appropriate forum.
User avatar
Mr. Sneelock
Posts: 7090
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:09 am
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 854 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by Mr. Sneelock » October 2nd, 2024, 2:35 pm

I don't understand why anyone thinks the Dakotas or the Montañas would be any better than Wyoming at the FBS level. Small population base, out of the way, small alumni bases, etc.
These users thanked the author Mr. Sneelock for the post (total 3):
NowhereLandAggieustate98apo


Formerly TulsAGGIE

User avatar
GeoAg
Moderator
Posts: 8986
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 1:09 am
Has thanked: 428 times
Been thanked: 2258 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by GeoAg » October 2nd, 2024, 3:06 pm

Mr. Sneelock wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 2:35 pm
I don't understand why anyone thinks the Dakotas or the Montañas would be any better than Wyoming at the FBS level. Small population base, out of the way, small alumni bases, etc.
We won't need to be considering any of those schools.
These users thanked the author GeoAg for the post (total 2):
918AGGustate98


“When this job came about, I felt a real connection, and it really was with the players. There’s just certain programs that have that ‘it’ factor. Utah State has the ‘it’ factor, and I think it starts and ends with our players.” -Coach Jerrod Calhoun

ChowderAggie
Posts: 1501
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 6:15 pm
Has thanked: 691 times
Been thanked: 469 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by ChowderAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 3:10 pm

GeoAg wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 3:06 pm
Mr. Sneelock wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 2:35 pm
I don't understand why anyone thinks the Dakotas or the Montañas would be any better than Wyoming at the FBS level. Small population base, out of the way, small alumni bases, etc.
We won't need to be considering any of those schools.
I agree, but Bozeman and Missoula are great college towns and are nothing like Laramie.



User avatar
ViAggie
Posts: 28770
Joined: June 16th, 2011, 6:49 pm
Location: Temecula, California
Has thanked: 8010 times
Been thanked: 3238 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by ViAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 3:15 pm

After adding Memphis and perhaps UTSA (hopefully Wichita State) we wont even remember who Wyoming is.


Just another day in the (Aggie) Brotherhood

Aggie702
Posts: 1749
Joined: November 5th, 2020, 5:28 pm
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 1389 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by Aggie702 » October 2nd, 2024, 3:20 pm

Mr. Sneelock wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 2:35 pm
I don't understand why anyone thinks the Dakotas or the Montañas would be any better than Wyoming at the FBS level. Small population base, out of the way, small alumni bases, etc.
The fee to jump from FBS to FCS is now $5MM, so even if a conference were considering adding, the FBS school would likely ask the conference to cover that. Otherwise, they'd stay put.



WannabeAgAlum
Posts: 432
Joined: November 15th, 2012, 6:48 pm
Has thanked: 326 times
Been thanked: 319 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by WannabeAgAlum » October 2nd, 2024, 3:22 pm

3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:57 pm
thrashsoundly wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:48 pm
3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:47 pm
thrashsoundly wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:45 pm
aceofspadeskb wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:41 pm
SLB wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:39 pm
LarryTheAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:36 pm
Man, USF is so far away, i Guess that is worse for them than for us. It's just one game for each team for us.

Even still I would prefer to grab, Memphis, Tulane and UTSA. Get to 10 football members, then take Wichita State for all other sports and be a 12 basketball teams.
USF is on the west coast.
USF = University of South Florida.
University of Sioux Falls
University of St Francis
Joliet or Fort Wayne?
Joliet to get a piece of the Chicago market...obviously.
University of Spanish Fark



User avatar
ViAggie
Posts: 28770
Joined: June 16th, 2011, 6:49 pm
Location: Temecula, California
Has thanked: 8010 times
Been thanked: 3238 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by ViAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 4:55 pm

WannabeAgAlum wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 3:22 pm
3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:57 pm
thrashsoundly wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:48 pm
3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:47 pm
thrashsoundly wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:45 pm
aceofspadeskb wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:41 pm
SLB wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:39 pm
LarryTheAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:36 pm
Man, USF is so far away, i Guess that is worse for them than for us. It's just one game for each team for us.

Even still I would prefer to grab, Memphis, Tulane and UTSA. Get to 10 football members, then take Wichita State for all other sports and be a 12 basketball teams.
USF is on the west coast.
USF = University of South Florida.
University of Sioux Falls
University of St Francis
Joliet or Fort Wayne?
Joliet to get a piece of the Chicago market...obviously.
University of Spanish Fark
which is technically located in Benjamin.


Just another day in the (Aggie) Brotherhood

StanfordAggie
Posts: 3474
Joined: November 15th, 2010, 6:36 pm
Has thanked: 1632 times
Been thanked: 1501 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by StanfordAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 5:59 pm

SLB wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:39 pm
LarryTheAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 1:36 pm
Man, USF is so far away, i Guess that is worse for them than for us. It's just one game for each team for us.

Even still I would prefer to grab, Memphis, Tulane and UTSA. Get to 10 football members, then take Wichita State for all other sports and be a 12 basketball teams.
USF is on the west coast.
There is a very realistic possibility that we could live in a world where Stanford and Cal play in the Atlantic Coast Conference and USF plays in the Pacific-12 conference.
These users thanked the author StanfordAggie for the post:
flying_scotsman2.0



User avatar
3rdGenAggie
Pick'em Champ - '16 Kickoff
Posts: 13809
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:53 pm
Location: The City of the Salty Lake
Has thanked: 5013 times
Been thanked: 3163 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by 3rdGenAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 6:01 pm

For whatever it's worth, some of the Oregon St fans that have posted heavily about realignment are starting to send cryptic tweets.

Possibly Oregon St related, but I'm guessing they're hearing something...what is it and is it's true are the questions.
These users thanked the author 3rdGenAggie for the post:
Section_L_Aggie


"I have no idea what I'm doing, but I know I'm doing it really, really well." -Andy Dwyer

Chatman
Posts: 1702
Joined: November 30th, 2010, 11:04 am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 428 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by Chatman » October 2nd, 2024, 6:03 pm

My guess is we are going to be surprised here. Some lower level P4 conference schools knowing they will be left out of the next round of conference consolidation will look at the PAC12 now as way to secure their future. Think schools like Iowa State. 😉



LarryTheAggie
Posts: 4107
Joined: July 4th, 2013, 12:04 pm
Has thanked: 2592 times
Been thanked: 3682 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by LarryTheAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 6:05 pm

Chatman wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:03 pm
My guess is we are going to be surprised here. Some lower level P4 conference schools knowing they will be left out of the next round of conference consolidation will look at the PAC12 now as way to secure their future. Think schools like Iowa State. 😉
Kansas, Arizona and Uconn...



Bullnamed_gus
Posts: 4146
Joined: October 31st, 2022, 12:25 pm
Has thanked: 691 times
Been thanked: 3009 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by Bullnamed_gus » October 2nd, 2024, 6:06 pm

LarryTheAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:05 pm
Chatman wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:03 pm
My guess is we are going to be surprised here. Some lower level P4 conference schools knowing they will be left out of the next round of conference consolidation will look at the PAC12 now as way to secure their future. Think schools like Iowa State. 😉
Kansas, Arizona and Uconn...
And add Creighton while we’re at it


If we somehow poached those schools I’d laugh so
Incredibly hard.

It’s a huge long shot but if we can get the right escalators and get a Huge basketball only deal the PAC could be more attractive for a school like Arizona, Arizona State, Utah or ybu.

The football quality level isn’t THAT different.

Boise state/Washington State/Oregon State all would be in the top half of the Big 12. Boise probably could be a contender to win it.

The Big 12 media deal is. Criminally over valued. If the PAC can get a close deal with escalators it could work. Same level of conference without having to go to Orlando or West Virginia.
Last edited by Bullnamed_gus on October 2nd, 2024, 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.



User avatar
shoresy
Posts: 1547
Joined: May 2nd, 2023, 12:07 pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 1438 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by shoresy » October 2nd, 2024, 6:09 pm

Bullnamed_gus wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:06 pm
LarryTheAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:05 pm
Chatman wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:03 pm
My guess is we are going to be surprised here. Some lower level P4 conference schools knowing they will be left out of the next round of conference consolidation will look at the PAC12 now as way to secure their future. Think schools like Iowa State. 😉
Kansas, Arizona and Uconn...
And add Creighton while we’re at it


If we somehow poached those schools I’d laugh so
Incredibly hard
The other schools, I could possibly see eventually once they're left out of football conferences.

Unless the Big East folds though, no way Creighton is leaving any time soon.



User avatar
3rdGenAggie
Pick'em Champ - '16 Kickoff
Posts: 13809
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:53 pm
Location: The City of the Salty Lake
Has thanked: 5013 times
Been thanked: 3163 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by 3rdGenAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 6:12 pm

If the Pac pulls lower level P4's (I sincerely doubt it), I'll be so glad USU got in when we did.


"I have no idea what I'm doing, but I know I'm doing it really, really well." -Andy Dwyer

SLB
Posts: 17578
Joined: November 3rd, 2016, 8:47 pm
Has thanked: 1546 times
Been thanked: 3274 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by SLB » October 2nd, 2024, 6:15 pm

Bullnamed_gus wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:06 pm
LarryTheAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:05 pm
Chatman wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:03 pm
My guess is we are going to be surprised here. Some lower level P4 conference schools knowing they will be left out of the next round of conference consolidation will look at the PAC12 now as way to secure their future. Think schools like Iowa State. 😉
Kansas, Arizona and Uconn...
And add Creighton while we’re at it


If we somehow poached those schools I’d laugh so
Incredibly hard.

It’s a huge long shot but if we can get the right escalators and get a Huge basketball only deal the PAC could be more attractive for a school like Arizona, Arizona State, Utah or ybu.

The football quality level isn’t THAT different.

Boise state/Washington State/Oregon State all would be in the top half of the Big 12. Boise probably could be a contender to win it.

The Big 12 media deal is. Criminally over valued. If the PAC can get a close deal with escalators it could work. Same level of conference without having to go to Orlando or West Virginia.
Creighton paired with Memphis makes sense.
Big East does not have football, and the Big East is made of schools that are not near Creighton.



LarryTheAggie
Posts: 4107
Joined: July 4th, 2013, 12:04 pm
Has thanked: 2592 times
Been thanked: 3682 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by LarryTheAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 6:24 pm

Bullnamed_gus wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:06 pm
LarryTheAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:05 pm
Chatman wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:03 pm
My guess is we are going to be surprised here. Some lower level P4 conference schools knowing they will be left out of the next round of conference consolidation will look at the PAC12 now as way to secure their future. Think schools like Iowa State. 😉
Kansas, Arizona and Uconn...
And add Creighton while we’re at it


If we somehow poached those schools I’d laugh so
Incredibly hard.

It’s a huge long shot but if we can get the right escalators and get a Huge basketball only deal the PAC could be more attractive for a school like Arizona, Arizona State, Utah or ybu.

The football quality level isn’t THAT different.

Boise state/Washington State/Oregon State all would be in the top half of the Big 12. Boise probably could be a contender to win it.

The Big 12 media deal is. Criminally over valued. If the PAC can get a close deal with escalators it could work. Same level of conference without having to go to Orlando or West Virginia.
I am pretty sure Kentucky and Duke submitted their Pac12 application as well.

:thumbsup:



User avatar
shoresy
Posts: 1547
Joined: May 2nd, 2023, 12:07 pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 1438 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by shoresy » October 2nd, 2024, 6:25 pm

SLB wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:15 pm
Bullnamed_gus wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:06 pm
LarryTheAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:05 pm
Chatman wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:03 pm
My guess is we are going to be surprised here. Some lower level P4 conference schools knowing they will be left out of the next round of conference consolidation will look at the PAC12 now as way to secure their future. Think schools like Iowa State. 😉
Kansas, Arizona and Uconn...
And add Creighton while we’re at it


If we somehow poached those schools I’d laugh so
Incredibly hard.

It’s a huge long shot but if we can get the right escalators and get a Huge basketball only deal the PAC could be more attractive for a school like Arizona, Arizona State, Utah or ybu.

The football quality level isn’t THAT different.

Boise state/Washington State/Oregon State all would be in the top half of the Big 12. Boise probably could be a contender to win it.

The Big 12 media deal is. Criminally over valued. If the PAC can get a close deal with escalators it could work. Same level of conference without having to go to Orlando or West Virginia.
Creighton paired with Memphis makes sense.
Big East does not have football, and the Big East is made of schools that are not near Creighton.
Creighton doesn't have football either. And Creighton would be just as close to most of the PAC as it currently to the Big East. And have you seen the most recent Big East tv deal?? Absolutely zero shot. That's a pipe dream.



Aggie702
Posts: 1749
Joined: November 5th, 2020, 5:28 pm
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 1389 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by Aggie702 » October 2nd, 2024, 6:28 pm

Lower level p4s aren't coming. They'd lose money
These users thanked the author Aggie702 for the post (total 5):
3rdGenAggieaggies22NowhereLandAggieStanfordAggieFull



User avatar
3rdGenAggie
Pick'em Champ - '16 Kickoff
Posts: 13809
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:53 pm
Location: The City of the Salty Lake
Has thanked: 5013 times
Been thanked: 3163 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by 3rdGenAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 6:29 pm

The Big East is literally a perfect conference for a school like Creighton. That's all we need to know.


"I have no idea what I'm doing, but I know I'm doing it really, really well." -Andy Dwyer

pilotaggie
Posts: 1763
Joined: November 13th, 2010, 6:53 pm
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 398 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by pilotaggie » October 2nd, 2024, 6:36 pm

3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:01 pm
For whatever it's worth, some of the Oregon St fans that have posted heavily about realignment are starting to send cryptic tweets.

Possibly Oregon St related, but I'm guessing they're hearing something...what is it and is it's true are the questions.
Help us less tech savvy and link said tweets?


This post is likely straight up poor sarcasm and cannot be taken seriously.

CacheCow
Posts: 786
Joined: April 16th, 2023, 2:48 pm
Has thanked: 2113 times
Been thanked: 701 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by CacheCow » October 2nd, 2024, 6:37 pm

This thread started off with me thinking “you guys need to dream bigger” and now it’s got me thinking “you guys need to dream smaller”
These users thanked the author CacheCow for the post (total 2):
flying_scotsman2.0MrBiggle



User avatar
3rdGenAggie
Pick'em Champ - '16 Kickoff
Posts: 13809
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:53 pm
Location: The City of the Salty Lake
Has thanked: 5013 times
Been thanked: 3163 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by 3rdGenAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 7:02 pm

pilotaggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:36 pm
3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:01 pm
For whatever it's worth, some of the Oregon St fans that have posted heavily about realignment are starting to send cryptic tweets.

Possibly Oregon St related, but I'm guessing they're hearing something...what is it and is it's true are the questions.
Help us less tech savvy and link said tweets?
It's just the cryptic stuff, but it wouldn't surprise me if they were really hearing things.





Last edited by 3rdGenAggie on October 2nd, 2024, 7:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.


"I have no idea what I'm doing, but I know I'm doing it really, really well." -Andy Dwyer

LarryTheAggie
Posts: 4107
Joined: July 4th, 2013, 12:04 pm
Has thanked: 2592 times
Been thanked: 3682 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by LarryTheAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 7:04 pm

Pretty sure this is happening.






SLB
Posts: 17578
Joined: November 3rd, 2016, 8:47 pm
Has thanked: 1546 times
Been thanked: 3274 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by SLB » October 2nd, 2024, 7:04 pm

CacheCow wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:37 pm
This thread started off with me thinking “you guys need to dream bigger” and now it’s got me thinking “you guys need to dream smaller”
The ACC-3 (Cal, Stanford, and SMU) is not in a good deal. It is possible that the PAC is working on landing Cal and Stanford with a media outlined deal and pending ACC case with Clemson and Florida State.



Imakeitrain
Posts: 16418
Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
Has thanked: 1119 times
Been thanked: 2563 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by Imakeitrain » October 2nd, 2024, 7:06 pm

3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:02 pm
pilotaggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:36 pm
3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:01 pm
For whatever it's worth, some of the Oregon St fans that have posted heavily about realignment are starting to send cryptic tweets.

Possibly Oregon St related, but I'm guessing they're hearing something...what is it and is it's true are the questions.
Help us less tech savvy and link said tweets?
It's just the cryptic stuff, but it wouldn't surprise me if they were really hearing things.







Are all the eye posts about this or the game with Weber?!?!?
These users thanked the author Imakeitrain for the post:
flying_scotsman2.0



User avatar
3rdGenAggie
Pick'em Champ - '16 Kickoff
Posts: 13809
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:53 pm
Location: The City of the Salty Lake
Has thanked: 5013 times
Been thanked: 3163 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by 3rdGenAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 7:07 pm

Imakeitrain wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:06 pm
3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:02 pm
pilotaggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:36 pm
3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:01 pm
For whatever it's worth, some of the Oregon St fans that have posted heavily about realignment are starting to send cryptic tweets.

Possibly Oregon St related, but I'm guessing they're hearing something...what is it and is it's true are the questions.
Help us less tech savvy and link said tweets?
It's just the cryptic stuff, but it wouldn't surprise me if they were really hearing things.
Are all the eye posts about this or the game with Weber?!?!?
Now I think it's mostly people messing around, but I would say a combo of both from the Utah State side.


"I have no idea what I'm doing, but I know I'm doing it really, really well." -Andy Dwyer

User avatar
3rdGenAggie
Pick'em Champ - '16 Kickoff
Posts: 13809
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:53 pm
Location: The City of the Salty Lake
Has thanked: 5013 times
Been thanked: 3163 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by 3rdGenAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 7:09 pm

SLB wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:04 pm
CacheCow wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:37 pm
This thread started off with me thinking “you guys need to dream bigger” and now it’s got me thinking “you guys need to dream smaller”
The ACC-3 (Cal, Stanford, and SMU) is not in a good deal. It is possible that the PAC is working on landing Cal and Stanford with a media outlined deal and pending ACC case with Clemson and Florida State.
They signed the ACC Grant of Rights. Only way they could get out is if they have some provisions allowing for an exit if/when Calford leaves.

That said, they'll go independent before they rejoin the PAC.


"I have no idea what I'm doing, but I know I'm doing it really, really well." -Andy Dwyer

SLB
Posts: 17578
Joined: November 3rd, 2016, 8:47 pm
Has thanked: 1546 times
Been thanked: 3274 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by SLB » October 2nd, 2024, 7:13 pm

3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:09 pm
SLB wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:04 pm
CacheCow wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:37 pm
This thread started off with me thinking “you guys need to dream bigger” and now it’s got me thinking “you guys need to dream smaller”
The ACC-3 (Cal, Stanford, and SMU) is not in a good deal. It is possible that the PAC is working on landing Cal and Stanford with a media outlined deal and pending ACC case with Clemson and Florida State.
They signed the ACC Grant of Rights. Only way they could get out is if they have some provisions allowing for an exit if/when Calford leaves.

That said, they'll go independent before they rejoin the PAC.
The ACC case with Florida State and Clemson impacts the future of the ACC.



User avatar
3rdGenAggie
Pick'em Champ - '16 Kickoff
Posts: 13809
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:53 pm
Location: The City of the Salty Lake
Has thanked: 5013 times
Been thanked: 3163 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by 3rdGenAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 7:18 pm

SLB wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:13 pm
3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:09 pm
SLB wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:04 pm
CacheCow wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:37 pm
This thread started off with me thinking “you guys need to dream bigger” and now it’s got me thinking “you guys need to dream smaller”
The ACC-3 (Cal, Stanford, and SMU) is not in a good deal. It is possible that the PAC is working on landing Cal and Stanford with a media outlined deal and pending ACC case with Clemson and Florida State.
They signed the ACC Grant of Rights. Only way they could get out is if they have some provisions allowing for an exit if/when Calford leaves.

That said, they'll go independent before they rejoin the PAC.
The ACC case with Florida State and Clemson impacts the future of the ACC.
I meant when Clemson and FSU leave.

But you're right, it'll be interesting to see what happens when they break the GoR.


"I have no idea what I'm doing, but I know I'm doing it really, really well." -Andy Dwyer

SLB
Posts: 17578
Joined: November 3rd, 2016, 8:47 pm
Has thanked: 1546 times
Been thanked: 3274 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by SLB » October 2nd, 2024, 7:23 pm

3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:18 pm
SLB wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:13 pm
3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:09 pm
SLB wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:04 pm
CacheCow wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:37 pm
This thread started off with me thinking “you guys need to dream bigger” and now it’s got me thinking “you guys need to dream smaller”
The ACC-3 (Cal, Stanford, and SMU) is not in a good deal. It is possible that the PAC is working on landing Cal and Stanford with a media outlined deal and pending ACC case with Clemson and Florida State.
They signed the ACC Grant of Rights. Only way they could get out is if they have some provisions allowing for an exit if/when Calford leaves.

That said, they'll go independent before they rejoin the PAC.
The ACC case with Florida State and Clemson impacts the future of the ACC.
I meant when Clemson and FSU leave.

But you're right, it'll be interesting to see what happens when they break the GoR.
If Clemson and Florida State win their case, the ACC payout will be so low for Cal, Stanford, and SMU that those 3 will have to leave the ACC.
The thing that Cal and Stanford would like about the PAC is to have Oregon State and Washington State on the schedule then nonconference chances at scheduling Oregon, Washington, UCLA, and USC while getting paid.



Chatman
Posts: 1702
Joined: November 30th, 2010, 11:04 am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 428 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by Chatman » October 2nd, 2024, 7:45 pm

Aggie702 wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:28 pm
Lower level p4s aren't coming. They'd lose money
Short term yes. But if they are worried about long term security it might be worth it to them to find a long term home. Possibility for sure



Imakeitrain
Posts: 16418
Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
Has thanked: 1119 times
Been thanked: 2563 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by Imakeitrain » October 2nd, 2024, 7:55 pm

3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:09 pm
SLB wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:04 pm
CacheCow wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:37 pm
This thread started off with me thinking “you guys need to dream bigger” and now it’s got me thinking “you guys need to dream smaller”
The ACC-3 (Cal, Stanford, and SMU) is not in a good deal. It is possible that the PAC is working on landing Cal and Stanford with a media outlined deal and pending ACC case with Clemson and Florida State.
They signed the ACC Grant of Rights. Only way they could get out is if they have some provisions allowing for an exit if/when Calford leaves.

That said, they'll go independent before they rejoin the PAC.
Yep.

Imagine if everyone but Wyo and UNM left for the PAC or AAC. So the MWC ads Tarleton State, Texas State, Sam Houston, NMSU, NAU, SD School of Mines, Minnesota Duluth, & NDSU.

Then Oregon State & Wazzu leave the PAC. Would we be interested in going back to the MWC?

Stanford would rather travel across the country to play Wake Forest & Duke because they would rather not be associated with the “educate everyone” schools like USU.



LarryTheAggie
Posts: 4107
Joined: July 4th, 2013, 12:04 pm
Has thanked: 2592 times
Been thanked: 3682 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by LarryTheAggie » October 2nd, 2024, 8:00 pm

Imakeitrain wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:55 pm
3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:09 pm
SLB wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:04 pm
CacheCow wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:37 pm
This thread started off with me thinking “you guys need to dream bigger” and now it’s got me thinking “you guys need to dream smaller”
The ACC-3 (Cal, Stanford, and SMU) is not in a good deal. It is possible that the PAC is working on landing Cal and Stanford with a media outlined deal and pending ACC case with Clemson and Florida State.
They signed the ACC Grant of Rights. Only way they could get out is if they have some provisions allowing for an exit if/when Calford leaves.

That said, they'll go independent before they rejoin the PAC.
Yep.

Imagine if everyone but Wyo and UNM left for the PAC or AAC. So the MWC ads Tarleton State, Texas State, Sam Houston, NMSU, NAU, SD School of Mines, Minnesota Duluth, & NDSU.

Then Oregon State & Wazzu leave the PAC. Would we be interested in going back to the MWC?

Stanford would rather travel across the country to play Wake Forest & Duke because they would rather not be associated with the “educate everyone” schools like USU.
I think they Might be able to handle being with the "educate everyone" schools like Utah State because we are R1. It's the "educated no one" schools that they don't want to be caught dead with :joking:
These users thanked the author LarryTheAggie for the post:
StanfordAggie



User avatar
AgTime
Posts: 2242
Joined: November 4th, 2010, 10:27 pm
Has thanked: 1438 times
Been thanked: 700 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by AgTime » October 2nd, 2024, 8:01 pm

LarryTheAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 8:00 pm
Imakeitrain wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:55 pm
3rdGenAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:09 pm
SLB wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:04 pm
CacheCow wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 6:37 pm
This thread started off with me thinking “you guys need to dream bigger” and now it’s got me thinking “you guys need to dream smaller”
The ACC-3 (Cal, Stanford, and SMU) is not in a good deal. It is possible that the PAC is working on landing Cal and Stanford with a media outlined deal and pending ACC case with Clemson and Florida State.
They signed the ACC Grant of Rights. Only way they could get out is if they have some provisions allowing for an exit if/when Calford leaves.

That said, they'll go independent before they rejoin the PAC.
Yep.

Imagine if everyone but Wyo and UNM left for the PAC or AAC. So the MWC ads Tarleton State, Texas State, Sam Houston, NMSU, NAU, SD School of Mines, Minnesota Duluth, & NDSU.

Then Oregon State & Wazzu leave the PAC. Would we be interested in going back to the MWC?

Stanford would rather travel across the country to play Wake Forest & Duke because they would rather not be associated with the “educate everyone” schools like USU.
I think they Might be able to handle being with the "educate everyone" schools like Utah State because we are R1. It's the "educated no one" schools that they don't want to be caught dead with :joking:
I mean OSU/WSU are basically in the category of “educate everyone“.
These users thanked the author AgTime for the post:
LarryTheAggie



slcagg
Posts: 15401
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 6:29 pm
Has thanked: 5044 times
Been thanked: 4715 times

Re: PAC 12 update

Post by slcagg » October 2nd, 2024, 8:07 pm

LarryTheAggie wrote:
October 2nd, 2024, 7:04 pm
Pretty sure this is happening.



This is my bet.



Locked Previous topicNext topic