Last two players named:

Player A: A fullback that played at a p5 and has transferred to a g5 in Utah, over his 4 years has 24 receiving yards and 0 rushing yards

Player b: 150 career tackles as a defensive back at a p5 that has also transferred to a g5 in Utah.

Which player should be ranked higher?

Why is A even ranked at all?

Here we go again.

First of all it’s not Scotty and Hans ranking!

They get a list of top players from coaches and then the media and the public got to vote. (Did any of you vote?)

The rankings are based off the votes. (I believe public votes only count for about 20%).

We have already had 3 players have their names called.

I personally like the media coverage.

Elkaggie wrote: ↑

June 17th, 2022, 10:58 pm

Here we go again.

First of all it’s not Scotty and Hans ranking!

They get a list of top players from coaches and then the media and the public got to vote. (Did any of you vote?)

The rankings are based off the votes. (I believe public votes only count for about 20%).

We have already had 3 players have their names called.

I personally like the media coverage.

Do you agree that player A should be ranked ahead of player B?

Did I say anything about Scotty and Hans? No. But the voting media should be fairly criticized for poor takes. Their profession is state sports reporting and should have some knowledge. If nothing else look at stats.

I do agree no matter where our guys land I like hearing the coaches take and hearing Hans review.

Btw did you hear what coach said about gurvan?

hipsterdoofus21 wrote: ↑

June 17th, 2022, 10:18 pm

Why is A even ranked at all?

Great question.

Elkaggie wrote: ↑

June 17th, 2022, 10:58 pm

Here we go again.

First of all it’s not Scotty and Hans ranking!

They get a list of top players from coaches and then the media and the public got to vote. (Did any of you vote?)

The rankings are based off the votes. (I believe public votes only count for about 20%).

We have already had 3 players have their names called.

I personally like the media coverage.

I voted.

hipsterdoofus21 wrote: ↑

June 17th, 2022, 10:18 pm

Why is A even ranked at all?

He was a 5-star recruit in high school.

aggies22 wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 2:21 am

hipsterdoofus21 wrote: ↑

June 17th, 2022, 10:18 pm

Why is A even ranked at all?

He was a 5-star recruit in high school.

a 5 star recruit that has 24 receiving yards and 0 rushing yards in 4 years. He must be a hell of a blocker.

aggies22 wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 2:20 am

Elkaggie wrote: ↑

June 17th, 2022, 10:58 pm

Here we go again.

First of all it’s not Scotty and Hans ranking!

They get a list of top players from coaches and then the media and the public got to vote. (Did any of you vote?)

The rankings are based off the votes. (I believe public votes only count for about 20%).

We have already had 3 players have their names called.

I personally like the media coverage.

I voted.

As did I

aggies22 wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 2:21 am

hipsterdoofus21 wrote: ↑

June 17th, 2022, 10:18 pm

Why is A even ranked at all?

He was a 5-star recruit in high school.

And b was a 4 star and contributing on a better p5 team. Stanford was terrible last yr.

Just pull up the same thread about the 60 in 60 from previous years, Change the names, and you’ll have the exact same thread that is started here….

Again, it’s message board sharing opinions about sports. It’s all good slcagg.

BTW, who are we even talking about?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2004AG wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 9:41 am

Again, it’s message board sharing opinions about sports. It’s all good slcagg.

BTW, who are we even talking about?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I assumed we were talking about the Hemuli kid.

2004AG wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 9:41 am

Again, it’s message board sharing opinions about sports. It’s all good slcagg.

BTW, who are we even talking about?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hemuli at byu transferred from Stanford and gurvan hall.

Btw listen to Blake’s comments on gurvan in his 60 of 60 segment. High praise.

aggies22 wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 10:30 am

2004AG wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 9:41 am

Again, it’s message board sharing opinions about sports. It’s all good slcagg.

BTW, who are we even talking about?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I assumed we were talking about the Hemuli kid.

Y'all forget that Lakei Heimuli was on the '84 all God team that the lemmings still worship. This kid could have zero athletic ability and he'd still make the list. Honestly, surprised he's not higher, we should be glad his last name isn't Kaufusi. This isn't new news.

ratofallaggies wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 9:37 am

Just pull up the same thread about the 60 in 60 from previous years, Change the names, and you’ll have the exact same thread that is started here….

And you have an issue, why? You could just choose not to click if you don’t want to read.

It is pretty obvious who should be ranked higher.

hipsterdoofus21 wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 7:06 am

aggies22 wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 2:21 am

hipsterdoofus21 wrote: ↑

June 17th, 2022, 10:18 pm

Why is A even ranked at all?

He was a 5-star recruit in high school.

a 5 star recruit that has 24 receiving yards and 0 rushing yards in 4 years. He must be a hell of a blocker.

He's pacing himself.

I hope the coaches are right about Hall and his change of scenery does him good but he was truly awful at Miami. Worst safety I’ve watched there in awhile so the skepticism and his ranking doesn’t bother me (though the 60 for 60 thing isn’t worth caring about regardless).

The entire 60 for 60 is illegitimate BS as long as fan vote counts for any part of it and especially this year where the ballot for fans was pre ranked with all BYU people at the top of the rankings (because it was alphabetical by school). So all the Cougar Clowns had to do was load the page and click submit and they’d fulfilled their duty.

They should remove the fan component.

Intermeddler wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 11:31 am

I hope the coaches are right about Hall and his change of scenery does him good but he was truly awful at Miami. Worst safety I’ve watched there in awhile so the skepticism and his ranking doesn’t bother me (though the 60 for 60 thing isn’t worth caring about regardless).

Booo!

rAggie wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 11:42 am

The entire 60 for 60 is illegitimate BS as long as fan vote counts for any part of it and especially this year where the ballot for fans was pre ranked with all BYU people at the top of the rankings (because it was alphabetical by school). So all the Cougar Clowns had to do was load the page and click submit and they’d fulfilled their duty.

They should remove the fan component.

Don't worry, I did my due diligence by moving all of the cougar players to the bottom of my list.

slcagg wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 11:56 am

Intermeddler wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 11:31 am

I hope the coaches are right about Hall and his change of scenery does him good but he was truly awful at Miami. Worst safety I’ve watched there in awhile so the skepticism and his ranking doesn’t bother me (though the 60 for 60 thing isn’t worth caring about regardless).

Booo!

I actually think he will be good for us. He is an elite athlete. He was pretty good as a freshman but regressed a lot the last couple years. I think reuniting with Banda and getting a fresh start with less pressure (guys knew they were sort of playing for Diaz to keep his job last year) will be good. Saban wanted him so much out of high school he arranged to fly to his high school from the airport in a helicopter and landed it on the football field during their practice to recruit him and he knows defensive back play better than anyone so he could certainly materialize, but he was just really bad as a football player the last couple years so I hope people have realistic expectations.

ratofallaggies wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 9:37 am

Just pull up the same thread about the 60 in 60 from previous years, Change the names, and you’ll have the exact same thread that is started here….

I was about to suggest the same. ....and there will be 3 more threads asking for a re-ranking to happen after the season. It finally happened last year and the preseason rankings proved to be hilariously inaccurate.

My bet is they are again. Accuracy and research seem to take a back seat to those involved in putting it together every year so we should just nod and laugh.

Aglicious wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 10:01 pm

I was about to suggest the same. ....and there will be 3 more threads asking for a re-ranking to happen after the season. It finally happened last year and the preseason rankings proved to be hilariously inaccurate.

My bet is they are again. Accuracy and research seem to take a back seat to those involved in putting it together every year so we should just nod and laugh.

I don't remember ever seeing or hearing about the reranking last year. They kept saying they were going to do it, but don't remember ever seeing a reference to it on social media.

hipsterdoofus21 wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 7:06 am

aggies22 wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 2:21 am

hipsterdoofus21 wrote: ↑

June 17th, 2022, 10:18 pm

Why is A even ranked at all?

He was a 5-star recruit in high school.

a 5 star recruit that has 24 receiving yards and 0 rushing yards in 4 years. He must be a hell of a blocker.

Hahahaha

Actually I noticed during the NFL draft that a team selected a TE who had hardly any stats, but he did a great job of moving people out of the way.

slcagg wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 10:45 am

ratofallaggies wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 9:37 am

Just pull up the same thread about the 60 in 60 from previous years, Change the names, and you’ll have the exact same thread that is started here….

And you have an issue, why? You could just choose not to click if you don’t want to read.

It is pretty obvious who should be ranked higher.

By all means, continue on then. I'll go grab some articles from the SLC media that we can complain about as well.

ratofallaggies wrote: ↑

June 21st, 2022, 3:05 pm

slcagg wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 10:45 am

ratofallaggies wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 9:37 am

Just pull up the same thread about the 60 in 60 from previous years, Change the names, and you’ll have the exact same thread that is started here….

And you have an issue, why? You could just choose not to click if you don’t want to read.

It is pretty obvious who should be ranked higher.

By all means, continue on then. I'll go grab some articles from the SLC media that we can complain about as well.

People still read the newspaper?

ViAggie wrote: ↑

June 21st, 2022, 2:21 pm

hipsterdoofus21 wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 7:06 am

aggies22 wrote: ↑

June 18th, 2022, 2:21 am

hipsterdoofus21 wrote: ↑

June 17th, 2022, 10:18 pm

Why is A even ranked at all?

He was a 5-star recruit in high school.

a 5 star recruit that has 24 receiving yards and 0 rushing yards in 4 years. He must be a hell of a blocker.

Hahahaha

Actually I noticed during the NFL draft that a team selected a TE who had hardly any stats, but he did a great job of moving people out of the way.

They'll beef him up and make him a tackle like the Falcons did with DJ Tialavea.

aggies22 wrote:

Elkaggie wrote: ↑

June 17th, 2022, 10:58 pm

Here we go again.

First of all it’s not Scotty and Hans ranking!

They get a list of top players from coaches and then the media and the public got to vote. (Did any of you vote?)

The rankings are based off the votes. (I believe public votes only count for about 20%).

We have already had 3 players have their names called.

I personally like the media coverage.

I voted.

Hey 22, question for you. I haven’t seen how it works. Is there a predetermined list of players that each coach submits and then the media and fans put them in an order or is it completely open where you can vote on any name that’s on the roster?

The coach from each school is told to submit his top X players. Blake was told to submit his top 10 players, while BYU and Utah each get to submit 20 or so. So the whole thing is just way to get listeners for advertisers. The fan vote, heavily skewed toward the Wasatch Front for obvious reasons (you can barely hear 1280 in Logan, 97.5 not at all), only counts as 20% of the final preseason ranking.

AggiesForever wrote: ↑

June 27th, 2022, 5:25 pm

The coach from each school is told to submit his top X players. Blake was told to submit his top 10 players, while BYU and Utah each get to submit 20 or so. So the whole thing is just way to get listeners for advertisers. The fan vote, heavily skewed toward the Wasatch Front for obvious reasons (you can barely hear 1280 in Logan, 97.5 not at all), only counts as 20% of the final preseason ranking.

Use the App.

Scotty and Hans are great and the only ones that mention USU pretty much at all.

AGGIEinIOWA wrote: ↑

June 21st, 2022, 5:47 pm

aggies22 wrote:

Elkaggie wrote: ↑

June 17th, 2022, 10:58 pm

Here we go again.

First of all it’s not Scotty and Hans ranking!

They get a list of top players from coaches and then the media and the public got to vote. (Did any of you vote?)

The rankings are based off the votes. (I believe public votes only count for about 20%).

We have already had 3 players have their names called.

I personally like the media coverage.

I voted.

Hey 22, question for you. I haven’t seen how it works. Is there a predetermined list of players that each coach submits and then the media and fans put them in an order or is it completely open where you can vote on any name that’s on the roster?

It's a predetermined list.

Quick update. Through the bottom 24 players. 4 of 23 Utes, 7 of 22 Coogs, 11 of 13 Aggies, and both Wildcats have been selected. Calvin Tyler and Logan Bonner are all that remain for USU.

WR’s for comparison. The first four are in the top 36, so not yet ranked.
Gunner Romney (BYU)
Puka Nacua (BYU)
Devaughn Vele (Utah)
Solomon Enis (Utah)
40. Justin McGriff (USU)
45. Jaylen Dixon (Utah)
48. Brian Cobbs (USU)
49. Keanu Hill (BYU)

SOS year after year. I won’t get back the 5-10 minutes I wasted on this.