Not good start for Love

This forum is for Football related topics only. Other topics will be moved to the appropriate forum.
AKAggie03
Posts: 442
Joined: May 12th, 2012, 7:27 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 24 times

Not good start for Love

Post by AKAggie03 » June 9th, 2021, 12:39 am

Without Rodgers, the Packers gave the majority of the No. 1 quarterback reps to Jordan Love, just as they had during OTAs. Love struggled with accuracy on Tuesday, missing several throws, and failed in his only attempt at the two-minute drill.

"He needs every rep he can get right now," LaFleur said of Love. "He's a young quarterback that was not afforded a preseason last year, and so we'll give him as many as he can handle. We'll spell him every now and again, but I just think every rep that he takes is so valuable, and he can learn something from both the good and the bad."
These users thanked the author AKAggie03 for the post:
JSHarvey


--For every Aggie victory, I'm going streaking on the quad!

User avatar
El Sapo
Posts: 1528
Joined: November 27th, 2017, 1:32 pm
Has thanked: 270 times
Been thanked: 195 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by El Sapo » June 9th, 2021, 9:43 am

Still waaaayyyyy toooo early to make any judgements. I doubt the Pack ever expected Love to be ready this season
These users thanked the author El Sapo for the post:
ViAggie


“Information is just bits of data. Knowledge is putting them together. Wisdom is transcending them.” ― Ram Dass

bwcrc
Posts: 223
Joined: November 7th, 2013, 12:24 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by bwcrc » June 9th, 2021, 9:52 am

El Sapo wrote:
June 9th, 2021, 9:43 am
Still waaaayyyyy toooo early to make any judgements. I doubt the Pack ever expected Love to be ready this season

Agree. I think the plan was to let Love develop a bit before throwing him out there. But if you want to believe the story on CBS Sports, the Pack's plan was to trade Rodgers in 2022.



hickaggie
Posts: 3313
Joined: November 15th, 2010, 10:13 am
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 281 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by hickaggie » June 9th, 2021, 1:19 pm




OrangeCountyAggie
Posts: 862
Joined: December 17th, 2018, 12:46 pm
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 307 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by OrangeCountyAggie » June 9th, 2021, 1:28 pm

I wouldn't believe anything from the media written about Jordan Love right now. They downplay how his talents and highlight his struggles to get more clicks from angry Packers fans who support Rodgers. Negative headlines like that are just click-bait and rarely tell the whole story. JL will be good.
These users thanked the author OrangeCountyAggie for the post:
AggieFBObsession



Aggie19
Posts: 960
Joined: November 2nd, 2018, 7:52 am
Has thanked: 695 times
Been thanked: 541 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by Aggie19 » June 9th, 2021, 2:47 pm

NFL Live just said he was lighting it up today at practice, so does that mean we can we overreact the other way now? :)
These users thanked the author Aggie19 for the post (total 2):
3rdGenAggieAggiesForever


Go Aggies!

taniataylor
Posts: 2129
Joined: June 24th, 2016, 9:21 am
Location: Monrovia, Ca
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 1376 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by taniataylor » June 9th, 2021, 4:08 pm

I just messaged him and told him to shut everyone up like he did when he was at USU
These users thanked the author taniataylor for the post (total 16):
BLUERUFiOAggie19Aglicious3rdGenAggieImakeitrainaggieguy13AggiePTNowhereLandAggieFL350AggieAggieBlues and 6 more users


Jordan Nathan's #1 Fan Copyright pending due to YBAs shenanigans

Aggie19
Posts: 960
Joined: November 2nd, 2018, 7:52 am
Has thanked: 695 times
Been thanked: 541 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by Aggie19 » June 9th, 2021, 4:17 pm

taniataylor wrote:
June 9th, 2021, 4:08 pm
I just messaged him and told him to shut everyone up like he did when he was at USU
And that's why we love you Tania!
These users thanked the author Aggie19 for the post (total 2):
AggiePTtaniataylor


Go Aggies!

Imakeitrain
Posts: 8546
Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
Has thanked: 221 times
Been thanked: 505 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by Imakeitrain » June 9th, 2021, 4:26 pm



I’m glad someone influential is noticing how tough Love has been. I can’t think of a draft pick more scrutinized before even having the chance to prove himself
These users thanked the author Imakeitrain for the post (total 2):
AggiePTAggiesForever


“If at first you don’t succeed, do not try skydiving”

UStateTim
Posts: 291
Joined: November 26th, 2013, 7:35 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by UStateTim » June 9th, 2021, 5:29 pm

All Love can do is just get better every day. I’ve got a feeling the 2 star recruit with one offer knows how to work his (I can't express myself without swearing) off and continue to develop. I’ve paid attention to only what the coaches and teammates have been saying and it’s very encouraging. The media will just overreact to every little thing he does this summer
These users thanked the author UStateTim for the post:
AggiesForever



User avatar
Dwigt
Pick'em Champ - '20 Weekly
Posts: 1309
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:23 am
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 112 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by Dwigt » June 9th, 2021, 5:30 pm



Me winning the ‘20 weekly pick’em was a complete fluke.

GameFAQSAggie
Posts: 6167
Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:10 am
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 377 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by GameFAQSAggie » June 9th, 2021, 6:28 pm

taniataylor wrote:
June 9th, 2021, 4:08 pm
I just messaged him and told him to shut everyone up like he did when he was at USU



Usu0505
Posts: 695
Joined: March 12th, 2018, 6:51 pm
Has thanked: 149 times
Been thanked: 131 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by Usu0505 » June 13th, 2021, 12:07 pm

These users thanked the author Usu0505 for the post:
slcagg



Winning Team
Posts: 208
Joined: February 5th, 2019, 12:59 pm
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by Winning Team » June 13th, 2021, 2:22 pm

So happy for him. I hope he just continues to kill it!
These users thanked the author Winning Team for the post:
AggiesForever



User avatar
AggiesForever
Pick'em Champ - '15 Kickoff
Posts: 2040
Joined: January 1st, 1997, 12:00 am
Has thanked: 309 times
Been thanked: 292 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by AggiesForever » June 15th, 2021, 12:44 am

First of all, the click baiters need to say bad stuff about Love to keep the story alive. In all likelihood, Rodgers stays out through the first couple of weeks of training camp, and then comes in and plays. This is what all of his “buddies” are saying.

The good news is, even if he does that, Love has received valuable reps and has firmly established himself as the back up. Rodgers is 38 and unlikely to play the entire season without some kind of injury. If that happens, Love will be ready.
These users thanked the author AggiesForever for the post (total 2):
3rdGenAggieNowhereLandAggie



OrangeCountyAggie
Posts: 862
Joined: December 17th, 2018, 12:46 pm
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 307 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by OrangeCountyAggie » June 21st, 2021, 1:35 am

GameFAQSAggie wrote:
June 9th, 2021, 6:28 pm
taniataylor wrote:
June 9th, 2021, 4:08 pm
I just messaged him and told him to shut everyone up like he did when he was at USU
I Love that uniform set.



OrangeCountyAggie
Posts: 862
Joined: December 17th, 2018, 12:46 pm
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 307 times

Re: Not good start for Love

Post by OrangeCountyAggie » June 21st, 2021, 1:35 am

Winning Team wrote:
June 13th, 2021, 2:22 pm
So happy for him. I hope he just continues to kill it!
He will.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic