Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
Frank's Statement
- JSHarvey
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: April 2nd, 2013, 12:45 pm
- Location: Sandy, UT
- Has thanked: 3532 times
- Been thanked: 352 times
Re: Frank's Statement
That statement was pure idiocy. In spite of the fourth paragraph, the first three paragraphs burned any hope of: "protect[ing] both the institution and players that I love."
Frank likely just ended his career as a coach for quite a while. Had he thought about this a bit more he would have realized:
1. The school made a significant effort to keep him on during the last transition, that means they value his role - and had he not agitated for the top job in a way that polarized the players he likely could have had many more years at USU.
2. Given he had already been looked over once before for the job that it was unlikely he would be the top candidate this time around.
3. Given the performance of the team this year his credibility for being able to "turn things around" wasn't great.
After that statement I would guess he likely won't have any role at USU (or anywhere else) for quite a while - even if what the players allege happened (which I don't think it did).
Frank likely just ended his career as a coach for quite a while. Had he thought about this a bit more he would have realized:
1. The school made a significant effort to keep him on during the last transition, that means they value his role - and had he not agitated for the top job in a way that polarized the players he likely could have had many more years at USU.
2. Given he had already been looked over once before for the job that it was unlikely he would be the top candidate this time around.
3. Given the performance of the team this year his credibility for being able to "turn things around" wasn't great.
After that statement I would guess he likely won't have any role at USU (or anywhere else) for quite a while - even if what the players allege happened (which I don't think it did).
- These users thanked the author JSHarvey for the post (total 2):
- USU78 • aggiesdotcom
"The purpose of education is not to validate ignorance but to overcome it." Lawrence Krauss
"Thinking is the hardest work there is, that's why so few people do it!" Henry Ford
"Thinking is the hardest work there is, that's why so few people do it!" Henry Ford
- GeoAg
- Moderator
- Posts: 8601
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 1:09 am
- Has thanked: 300 times
- Been thanked: 1731 times
Re: Frank's Statement
I for one, given what I know of Frank and very surprised by this statement. I hold him in high esteem and find the conspiracy theory some are espousing with this hard to imagine. Frank wouldn't normally act this way. Also, the players wouldn't normally give up a chance to play. Also, Noelle wouldn't act this way, but given her statement, however she meant it, she at least said something that allowed for this type of a reaction. I am reserving judgement on all of this.
You guys realize that Frank would realize the same issues you are bringing up and yet we have this statement. It would be easy for him to walk away, but he is risking a lot by speaking up and I don't think it would be done lightly, with evil intent, or without some pretty serious concerns behind it.
You guys realize that Frank would realize the same issues you are bringing up and yet we have this statement. It would be easy for him to walk away, but he is risking a lot by speaking up and I don't think it would be done lightly, with evil intent, or without some pretty serious concerns behind it.
- These users thanked the author GeoAg for the post:
- TransplantedSpud
"You guys have sacrificed in ways you've never sacrificed before. You've given more. You expect more...Tonight is our opportunity to write the story of who this family, who this program, who this team will be" -Coach Blake Anderson
-
- Posts: 4021
- Joined: November 15th, 2010, 10:13 am
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 877 times
Re: Frank's Statement
I guarantee you that your concerns are not the concerns of the attorney who drafted it.JSHarvey wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:26 pmThat statement was pure idiocy. In spite of the fourth paragraph, the first three paragraphs burned any hope of: "protect[ing] both the institution and players that I love."
Frank likely just ended his career as a coach for quite a while. Had he thought about this a bit more he would have realized:
1. The school made a significant effort to keep him on during the last transition, that means they value his role - and had he not agitated for the top job in a way that polarized the players he likely could have had many more years at USU.
2. Given he had already been looked over once before for the job that it was unlikely he would be the top candidate this time around.
3. Given the performance of the team this year his credibility for being able to "turn things around" wasn't great.
After that statement I would guess he likely won't have any role at USU (or anywhere else) for quite a while - even if what the players allege happened (which I don't think it did).
- Sl7vk
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: November 18th, 2018, 9:07 pm
- Location: Holladay Utah
- Has thanked: 817 times
- Been thanked: 1847 times
Re: Frank's Statement
The more I've watched things play out the last 5 weeks the more it's my opinion that FM was the divisive influence on the locker room. By creating factions you can effectively advance your position, and it appears this was FM's strategy from the start.
The further he gets from our players, our program and our University the better it will be for everyone.
The further he gets from our players, our program and our University the better it will be for everyone.
- GeoAg
- Moderator
- Posts: 8601
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 1:09 am
- Has thanked: 300 times
- Been thanked: 1731 times
Re: Frank's Statement
I don't buy that.Sl7vk wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:29 pmThe more I've watched things play out the last 5 weeks the more it's my opinion that FM was the divisive influence on the locker room. By creating factions you can effectively advance your position, and it appears this was FM's strategy from the start.
The further he gets from our players, our program and our University the better it will be for everyone.
"You guys have sacrificed in ways you've never sacrificed before. You've given more. You expect more...Tonight is our opportunity to write the story of who this family, who this program, who this team will be" -Coach Blake Anderson
- Naked Bull Rider
- Posts: 610
- Joined: July 10th, 2015, 11:15 am
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 217 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Hoping that the independent investigation proves that any comments made about religion or culture were misinterpreted by the players. If that happens (and I expect it will) then I’m not too worried that there will be a lawsuit. Frank and his attorneys won’t have the same resources and $$$ to keep up with the university. Without any real teeth, this would be a frivolous lawsuit to pursue.Aggie formerly in Hawaii wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:25 pmMost likely you are right as long as we put together the right staff. I do worry this story gets even bigger with lawsuits coming. This could look really bad for the school if it extends outside of sports media.Naked Bull Rider wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:21 pmThe Polynesian pipeline isn’t going anywhere. Stop overreacting.
None of the alleged comments have even been confirmed. Morgan Scalley admitted to using the N word and the Utes are still bringing in talented black athletes.
At the end of the day, memories are short and 18 year old kids just want to play football. If you think a kid with one FBS offer is going to turn down Utah State, you’re up in the night.
- AgMac
- Posts: 3151
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:29 am
- Has thanked: 422 times
- Been thanked: 631 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Risking a lot? That's laughable. The risk is minimal compared to reward$$$$$$$$.GeoAg wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:29 pmI for one, given what I know of Frank and very surprised by this statement. I hold him in high esteem and find the conspiracy theory some are espousing with this hard to imagine. Frank wouldn't normally act this way. Also, the players wouldn't normally give up a chance to play. Also, Noelle wouldn't act this way, but given her statement, however she meant it, she at least said something that allowed for this type of a reaction. I am reserving judgement on all of this.
You guys realize that Frank would realize the same issues you are bringing up and yet we have this statement. It would be easy for him to walk away, but he is risking a lot by speaking up and I don't think it would be done lightly, with evil intent, or without some pretty serious concerns behind it.
This is, 100%, about Frank getting a payday. Think about it, he was part of the leadership of a program he is now claiming discriminates. Perhaps you would have said something during the past 15 years if you noticed any discrimination.
- These users thanked the author AgMac for the post (total 3):
- 2004AG • 3rdGenAggie • 918AGG
-
- Posts: 4021
- Joined: November 15th, 2010, 10:13 am
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 877 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Oh I'm sure he'll have all the resources he needs. This isn't that intensive of a case. It will probably settle pretty quickly given that its the flagship football program affected.Naked Bull Rider wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:34 pmHoping that the independent investigation proves that any comments made about religion or culture were misinterpreted by the players. If that happens (and I expect it will) then I’m not too worried that there will be a lawsuit. Frank and his attorneys won’t have the same resources and $$$ to keep up with the university. Without any real teeth, this would be a frivolous lawsuit to pursue.Aggie formerly in Hawaii wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:25 pmMost likely you are right as long as we put together the right staff. I do worry this story gets even bigger with lawsuits coming. This could look really bad for the school if it extends outside of sports media.Naked Bull Rider wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:21 pmThe Polynesian pipeline isn’t going anywhere. Stop overreacting.
None of the alleged comments have even been confirmed. Morgan Scalley admitted to using the N word and the Utes are still bringing in talented black athletes.
At the end of the day, memories are short and 18 year old kids just want to play football. If you think a kid with one FBS offer is going to turn down Utah State, you’re up in the night.
- These users thanked the author hickaggie for the post:
- ineptimusprime
-
- Posts: 8059
- Joined: October 22nd, 2016, 1:06 am
- Has thanked: 2312 times
- Been thanked: 2589 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Yeah if there is nothing there than there is nothing there. We'll see what comes out. I do hope it is nothing and we can all move on.Naked Bull Rider wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:34 pmHoping that the independent investigation proves that any comments made about religion or culture were misinterpreted by the players. If that happens (and I expect it will) then I’m not too worried that there will be a lawsuit. Frank and his attorneys won’t have the same resources and $$$ to keep up with the university. Without any real teeth, this would be a frivolous lawsuit to pursue.Aggie formerly in Hawaii wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:25 pmMost likely you are right as long as we put together the right staff. I do worry this story gets even bigger with lawsuits coming. This could look really bad for the school if it extends outside of sports media.Naked Bull Rider wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:21 pmThe Polynesian pipeline isn’t going anywhere. Stop overreacting.
None of the alleged comments have even been confirmed. Morgan Scalley admitted to using the N word and the Utes are still bringing in talented black athletes.
At the end of the day, memories are short and 18 year old kids just want to play football. If you think a kid with one FBS offer is going to turn down Utah State, you’re up in the night.
- These users thanked the author Aggie formerly in Hawaii for the post:
- Naked Bull Rider
-
- Posts: 7814
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:07 pm
- Has thanked: 407 times
- Been thanked: 4835 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Oh, the way this statement reads, it’s probably a safe bet there’ll be a lawsuit unless the players are completely discredited. Frank will then get some quick insurance money and USU be left trying to pick up the pieces.Naked Bull Rider wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:34 pmHoping that the independent investigation proves that any comments made about religion or culture were misinterpreted by the players. If that happens (and I expect it will) then I’m not too worried that there will be a lawsuit. Frank and his attorneys won’t have the same resources and $$$ to keep up with the university. Without any real teeth, this would be a frivolous lawsuit to pursue.Aggie formerly in Hawaii wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:25 pmMost likely you are right as long as we put together the right staff. I do worry this story gets even bigger with lawsuits coming. This could look really bad for the school if it extends outside of sports media.Naked Bull Rider wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:21 pmThe Polynesian pipeline isn’t going anywhere. Stop overreacting.
None of the alleged comments have even been confirmed. Morgan Scalley admitted to using the N word and the Utes are still bringing in talented black athletes.
At the end of the day, memories are short and 18 year old kids just want to play football. If you think a kid with one FBS offer is going to turn down Utah State, you’re up in the night.
I’d tell the carrier to pony up the money too unless we had something really solid to defend on. The hit to the university’s reputation from an ongoing lawsuit based on alleged discrimination is much worse than any insurance money being paid out.
Last edited by ineptimusprime on December 13th, 2020, 2:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: December 12th, 2018, 2:00 pm
- Has thanked: 362 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Then Frank needs to F#a@ing say what the alleged quote is and he needs to do it now. Vague accusations can't be fought. The reputational damage has already been done and we have no idea what was supposedly said. Every second that goes by without clarification makes me less likely to believe it.GeoAg wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:29 pmI for one, given what I know of Frank and very surprised by this statement. I hold him in high esteem and find the conspiracy theory some are espousing with this hard to imagine. Frank wouldn't normally act this way. Also, the players wouldn't normally give up a chance to play. Also, Noelle wouldn't act this way, but given her statement, however she meant it, she at least said something that allowed for this type of a reaction. I am reserving judgement on all of this.
You guys realize that Frank would realize the same issues you are bringing up and yet we have this statement. It would be easy for him to walk away, but he is risking a lot by speaking up and I don't think it would be done lightly, with evil intent, or without some pretty serious concerns behind it.
Last edited by CastIronAggie on December 13th, 2020, 2:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- These users thanked the author CastIronAggie for the post:
- JSHarvey
- 2004AG
- Posts: 12424
- Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 800 times
- Been thanked: 1601 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Unless there is some huge smoking gun, I really hope the university doesn't settle and Franks football coaching career is over.hickaggie wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:36 pmOh I'm sure he'll have all the resources he needs. This isn't that intensive of a case. It will probably settle pretty quickly given that its the flagship football program affected.Naked Bull Rider wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:34 pmHoping that the independent investigation proves that any comments made about religion or culture were misinterpreted by the players. If that happens (and I expect it will) then I’m not too worried that there will be a lawsuit. Frank and his attorneys won’t have the same resources and $$$ to keep up with the university. Without any real teeth, this would be a frivolous lawsuit to pursue.Aggie formerly in Hawaii wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:25 pmMost likely you are right as long as we put together the right staff. I do worry this story gets even bigger with lawsuits coming. This could look really bad for the school if it extends outside of sports media.Naked Bull Rider wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:21 pmThe Polynesian pipeline isn’t going anywhere. Stop overreacting.
None of the alleged comments have even been confirmed. Morgan Scalley admitted to using the N word and the Utes are still bringing in talented black athletes.
At the end of the day, memories are short and 18 year old kids just want to play football. If you think a kid with one FBS offer is going to turn down Utah State, you’re up in the night.
Re: Frank's Statement
This is exactly what Frank had to say. He didn't accuse the school directly. He said based off of what the players told him. Then he calls for an investigation that is already underway. He is supporting the players who supported him while not wanting any immediate direct action. Too much over reaction to his statement
- These users thanked the author hvaggie for the post:
- LarryTheAggie
-
- Posts: 4021
- Joined: November 15th, 2010, 10:13 am
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 877 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Understanding his statement is key. I am not being critical of Frank at all here. Given the information his counsel is running the show and doing his job. Anyone would do the same at this stage. Protect your interests and your potential legal claims.hvaggie wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:38 pmThis is exactly what Frank had to say. He didn't accuse the school directly. He said based off of what the players told him. Then he calls for an investigation that is already underway. He is supporting the players who supported him while not wanting any immediate direct action. Too much over reaction to his statement
-
- Posts: 7814
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:07 pm
- Has thanked: 407 times
- Been thanked: 4835 times
Re: Frank's Statement
I think the attorney who drafted this could have done a better job balancing Frank’s future employability. There’s not really a need to go all in at this point.hickaggie wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:41 pmUnderstanding his statement is key. I am not being critical of Frank at all here. Given the information his counsel is running the show and doing his job. Anyone would do the same at this stage. Protect your interests and your potential legal claims.hvaggie wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:38 pmThis is exactly what Frank had to say. He didn't accuse the school directly. He said based off of what the players told him. Then he calls for an investigation that is already underway. He is supporting the players who supported him while not wanting any immediate direct action. Too much over reaction to his statement
-
- Posts: 2258
- Joined: December 10th, 2010, 1:32 pm
- Has thanked: 785 times
- Been thanked: 811 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Prior to this statement, I could see hope for an amicable resolution. Now, I don't see that happening.
I think his counsel didn't do a very good job of keeping that option in play.
I think his counsel didn't do a very good job of keeping that option in play.
-
- Posts: 4021
- Joined: November 15th, 2010, 10:13 am
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 877 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Yeah, it pretty much throws the hammer down. I'd want to be real sure of my evidence. That is the odd thing there. I think one attorney or firm is involved with the players and Frank and is trying to keep the players actual statements out of the public until he or she is comfortable with the exact allegations and can give a joint statement to that effect.ineptimusprime wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:43 pmI think the attorney who drafted this could have done a better job balancing Frank’s future employability. There’s not really a need to go all in at this point.hickaggie wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:41 pmUnderstanding his statement is key. I am not being critical of Frank at all here. Given the information his counsel is running the show and doing his job. Anyone would do the same at this stage. Protect your interests and your potential legal claims.hvaggie wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:38 pmThis is exactly what Frank had to say. He didn't accuse the school directly. He said based off of what the players told him. Then he calls for an investigation that is already underway. He is supporting the players who supported him while not wanting any immediate direct action. Too much over reaction to his statement
- Sl7vk
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: November 18th, 2018, 9:07 pm
- Location: Holladay Utah
- Has thanked: 817 times
- Been thanked: 1847 times
Re: Frank's Statement
This part of his statement leads me to believe that Frank did absolutely nothing to get our players on the field on Saturday, and to the contrary encouraged their actions.
“As disheartened as I am to learn that this kind of religious and cultural bias exists (because I am Polynesian) at Utah State University, I am equally heart-broken for my players – many of whom are seniors who were preparing for the last game of their collegiate experience. I want to express my upmost respect and admiration for their decision to stand up for what they believe in — and I’m truly honored that they would stand up for me.
“As disheartened as I am to learn that this kind of religious and cultural bias exists (because I am Polynesian) at Utah State University, I am equally heart-broken for my players – many of whom are seniors who were preparing for the last game of their collegiate experience. I want to express my upmost respect and admiration for their decision to stand up for what they believe in — and I’m truly honored that they would stand up for me.
- USU78
- Pick'em Champ - '16 Weekly
- Posts: 15412
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:43 am
- Location: Sandy
- Has thanked: 7169 times
- Been thanked: 2087 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Yup. Gotta massage Cockett's "statement" behind closed doors until you get them just right at the players' depositions.hickaggie wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:48 pmYeah, it pretty much throws the hammer down. I'd want to be real sure of my evidence. That is the odd thing there. I think one attorney or firm is involved with the players and Frank and is trying to keep the players actual statements out of the public until he or she is comfortable with the exact allegations and can give a joint statement to that effect.ineptimusprime wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:43 pmI think the attorney who drafted this could have done a better job balancing Frank’s future employability. There’s not really a need to go all in at this point.hickaggie wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:41 pmUnderstanding his statement is key. I am not being critical of Frank at all here. Given the information his counsel is running the show and doing his job. Anyone would do the same at this stage. Protect your interests and your potential legal claims.hvaggie wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:38 pmThis is exactly what Frank had to say. He didn't accuse the school directly. He said based off of what the players told him. Then he calls for an investigation that is already underway. He is supporting the players who supported him while not wanting any immediate direct action. Too much over reaction to his statement
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
- 2004AG
- Posts: 12424
- Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 800 times
- Been thanked: 1601 times
Re: Frank's Statement
It helps his case $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ that they didn't play on Saturday.Sl7vk wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:50 pmThis part of his statement leads me to believe that Frank did absolutely nothing to get our players on the field on Saturday, and to the contrary encouraged their actions.
“As disheartened as I am to learn that this kind of religious and cultural bias exists (because I am Polynesian) at Utah State University, I am equally heart-broken for my players – many of whom are seniors who were preparing for the last game of their collegiate experience. I want to express my upmost respect and admiration for their decision to stand up for what they believe in — and I’m truly honored that they would stand up for me.
-
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: November 5th, 2010, 10:10 pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 766 times
Re: Frank's Statement
And yet still no actual quote or evidence produced of claimed discrimination. And at what point do we all just accuse people of discrimination to get what we want? The world doesn't work that way.......or maybe it does. Sad.
- These users thanked the author coolag for the post (total 2):
- CastIronAggie • AgMac
Regulator of Class
- Naked Bull Rider
- Posts: 610
- Joined: July 10th, 2015, 11:15 am
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 217 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Couldn’t agree more! Fingers crossed the whole thing shakes out quickly. I’d hate for this to continue to be a headline going into spring ball. The team needs to stay focused.Aggie formerly in Hawaii wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:36 pmYeah if there is nothing there than there is nothing there. We'll see what comes out. I do hope it is nothing and we can all move on.Naked Bull Rider wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:34 pmHoping that the independent investigation proves that any comments made about religion or culture were misinterpreted by the players. If that happens (and I expect it will) then I’m not too worried that there will be a lawsuit. Frank and his attorneys won’t have the same resources and $$$ to keep up with the university. Without any real teeth, this would be a frivolous lawsuit to pursue.Aggie formerly in Hawaii wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:25 pmMost likely you are right as long as we put together the right staff. I do worry this story gets even bigger with lawsuits coming. This could look really bad for the school if it extends outside of sports media.Naked Bull Rider wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 2:21 pmThe Polynesian pipeline isn’t going anywhere. Stop overreacting.
None of the alleged comments have even been confirmed. Morgan Scalley admitted to using the N word and the Utes are still bringing in talented black athletes.
At the end of the day, memories are short and 18 year old kids just want to play football. If you think a kid with one FBS offer is going to turn down Utah State, you’re up in the night.
As for Frank, wherever he ends up I wish him success.
- These users thanked the author Naked Bull Rider for the post:
- vegasaggie
- Empire of Dirt
- Posts: 3351
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:57 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Board Lawyers...
So, let's say that the hearsay of hearsay is correct (or at least can be somewhat substantiated.) Cockett said that she was concerned about him being from Utah and being Polynesian.
What does a settlement look like?
Anderson just signed a $5M contract. Are those the damages that Maile is looking for, a $5M settlement? More/less?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
So, let's say that the hearsay of hearsay is correct (or at least can be somewhat substantiated.) Cockett said that she was concerned about him being from Utah and being Polynesian.
What does a settlement look like?
Anderson just signed a $5M contract. Are those the damages that Maile is looking for, a $5M settlement? More/less?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
"If you are not an Aggie Fan you are a complete loser." -Kyle Gunther
-
- Posts: 319
- Joined: November 15th, 2012, 6:48 pm
- Has thanked: 181 times
- Been thanked: 233 times
Re: Frank's Statement
I spoke to a former long time employee of USU who rubbed shoulders with USU adminstration over the years. This person indicated that there was definitely religious discrimination practiced with hiring decisions, among other things. This person is not following closely this football issue but what the players are saying happened is consistent with what this person has seen.
Personally I'm not sure what to think.
Personally I'm not sure what to think.
- These users thanked the author WannabeAgAlum for the post:
- TransplantedSpud
-
- Posts: 3680
- Joined: July 11th, 2011, 9:59 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 177 times
Re: Frank's Statement
ineptimusprime wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 1:49 pm
Wow. Just wow. Hope someone was recording that Zoom call.
Also, to whatever lawyer wrote this, the word is “utmost,” not “upmost.”
-
- Posts: 3680
- Joined: July 11th, 2011, 9:59 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 177 times
- sammyhagar
- Posts: 552
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 9:15 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 147 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Erase the names on top of the resumes, ask 1 million people who know anything about football to choose the best coach.
1 million people do not choose Frank, I hope his legal team takes this into consideration.
what a tool
1 million people do not choose Frank, I hope his legal team takes this into consideration.
what a tool
- tetonaggie
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 8:46 pm
- Has thanked: 101 times
- Been thanked: 169 times
Re: Frank's Statement
I’m not going to fry Frank over this yet. It appears he’s getting his information on what was said from the players, and if he was discriminated against on the basis of religion and race, as the players seemed to be convinced of, he has every right to feel slighted and also every right to want to rectify the situation, whatever that results in. Any of you would/should do the same if your employer discriminates against you for the same reasons. I’m withholding judgment for now and I want to express my gratitude to Frank for the many years of fantastic recruiting and dedication that he devoted to his alma-mater.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author tetonaggie for the post:
- TransplantedSpud
-
- Posts: 3895
- Joined: November 9th, 2010, 5:04 pm
- Has thanked: 1304 times
- Been thanked: 1113 times
Re: Frank's Statement
With Cockett directly or just in instances over years? Huge difference.WannabeAgAlum wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 3:05 pmI spoke to a former long time employee of USU who rubbed shoulders with USU adminstration over the years. This person indicated that there was definitely religious discrimination practiced with hiring decisions, among other things. This person is not following closely this football issue but what the players are saying happened is consistent with what this person has seen.
Personally I'm not sure what to think.
- These users thanked the author bluegrouse for the post:
- CastIronAggie
- BLUERUFiO
- Posts: 2877
- Joined: August 30th, 2011, 1:22 pm
- Location: Smithfield
- Has thanked: 2796 times
- Been thanked: 302 times
Re: Frank's Statement
There are some hearsay exemptions that may be at play here. Namely, the party admission exemption: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_admission
I’d think Frank would ask for damages like the deal offered to Blake.
I’m a lowly personal injury lawyer in the valley and am not an employment lawyer so take this with a grain of salt.
I’d think Frank would ask for damages like the deal offered to Blake.
I’m a lowly personal injury lawyer in the valley and am not an employment lawyer so take this with a grain of salt.
Last edited by BLUERUFiO on December 13th, 2020, 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
GO AGGIES! GO AGGIES! HEY! HEY! HEY!
-
- Posts: 670
- Joined: September 1st, 2015, 5:12 pm
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 53 times
Re: Frank's Statement
My mother in law works at the university, she also says there is a pretty large group of teachers and admin that are quite publicly outspoken about disliking the church. She didn’t say that she had any reason to believe that Cockett is part of that group, just simply that it exists. What she told me doesn’t change how I feel, if the allegations are true, good for the players, If they are false it’s very disappointing the amount of damage that has been caused. All I can say is wait and see what facts are able to come to light.WannabeAgAlum wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 3:05 pmI spoke to a former long time employee of USU who rubbed shoulders with USU adminstration over the years. This person indicated that there was definitely religious discrimination practiced with hiring decisions, among other things. This person is not following closely this football issue but what the players are saying happened is consistent with what this person has seen.
Personally I'm not sure what to think.
- These users thanked the author Aggieforlife for the post (total 2):
- MrBiggle • TransplantedSpud
-
- Posts: 7814
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:07 pm
- Has thanked: 407 times
- Been thanked: 4835 times
Re: Frank's Statement
I don’t do this type of work (I do defense side med mal and personal injury), so won’t speculate about valuation. My guess? the settlement would be for an amount within whatever the policy limits are and would come very quickly (perhaps in response to a demand letter and before a lawsuit is even filed). Any ambiguity about what happened weighs towards settlement. It seems unlikely to me the case would ever get to the point where players are being deposed.Empire of Dirt wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 3:02 pmBoard Lawyers...
So, let's say that the hearsay of hearsay is correct (or at least can be somewhat substantiated.) Cockett said that she was concerned about him being from Utah and being Polynesian.
What does a settlement look like?
Anderson just signed a $5M contract. Are those the damages that Maile is looking for, a $5M settlement? More/less?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
The biggest reason is the effect of an ongoing discrimination lawsuit premised on alleged discrimination by the University president would be astronomically bad for the University and football program. It would death by a thousand cuts over an extended period of time. A good ID lawyer that understood the University not the carrier is his/her client would encourage settlement within policy limits unless it is 100% certain Cockett is clean.
Last edited by ineptimusprime on December 13th, 2020, 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- These users thanked the author ineptimusprime for the post (total 2):
- oleblu111 • BLUERUFiO
-
- Posts: 3895
- Joined: November 9th, 2010, 5:04 pm
- Has thanked: 1304 times
- Been thanked: 1113 times
Re: Frank's Statement
For me it comes down to this: I’m supposed to believe that the most inclusive, student-oriented President in my lifetime (maybe all time) got on a Zoom call with a bunch of students, some of which are likely to be Mormons and/or Polynesians, and told them that they coach they love and have called this meeting to lobby for wasn’t going to be hired because he’s Mormon and Polynesian.
I’m sorry but just doesn’t pass the smell test in any way, especially considering everything I know and have heard about Noelle Cockett. It just doesn’t.
I’m sorry but just doesn’t pass the smell test in any way, especially considering everything I know and have heard about Noelle Cockett. It just doesn’t.
Last edited by bluegrouse on December 13th, 2020, 3:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- These users thanked the author bluegrouse for the post (total 7):
- GaAggie • BustaMcNutt • GreenAg • aggiesdotcom • vegasaggie • aggieguy13 • JSHarvey
- BLUERUFiO
- Posts: 2877
- Joined: August 30th, 2011, 1:22 pm
- Location: Smithfield
- Has thanked: 2796 times
- Been thanked: 302 times
Re: Frank's Statement
Yeah, Frank certainly has some powerful leverage. I wonder what kind of policy limits the school has for this kind of thing?ineptimusprime wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 3:19 pmI don’t do this type of work (I do defense side med mal and personal injury), so won’t speculate about valuation. My guess? the settlement would be for an amount within whatever the policy limits are and would come very quickly (perhaps in response to a demand letter and before a lawsuit is even filed). Any ambiguity about what happened weighs towards settlement. It seems unlikely to me the case would ever get to the point where players are being deposed.Empire of Dirt wrote: ↑December 13th, 2020, 3:02 pmBoard Lawyers...
So, let's say that the hearsay of hearsay is correct (or at least can be somewhat substantiated.) Cockett said that she was concerned about him being from Utah and being Polynesian.
What does a settlement look like?
Anderson just signed a $5M contract. Are those the damages that Maile is looking for, a $5M settlement? More/less?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
The biggest reason is the effect of an ongoing discrimination lawsuit premised on alleged discrimination by the University president would be astronomically bad for the University and football program.
GO AGGIES! GO AGGIES! HEY! HEY! HEY!