Football Home Game
Sat, August 31, 2024
Sat, August 31, 2024
Basketball Home Game
Fri, November 1, 2024
Fri, November 1, 2024
Graham Harrell
-
2004AG
- Posts: 12423
- Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 798 times
- Been thanked: 1601 times
Re: Graham Herrell
I don’t get why everyone is on your (I can't express myself without swearing). I appreciate the info.stang wrote:I'm complaining about Isaac posting false information and passing it off as fact. I'm posting true information, and you can accept it as fact or not, but I thought some on this board may be interested to know it.splintorb wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:57 pmDude! Are you reading your own messages?? You are literally being EXACTLY what you’re complaining about...stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:52 pmWe'll see who ends up being right.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:50 pmI feel like you’re doing exactly what you accuse issac of doing.stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:54 pmIsaac is wrong. Graham Harrell will not be coaching at USU and there are no current negotiations. He wanted so badly to be first that he "reported" recklessly and got hopes up.slcagg wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:49 pmYup exactly. Isaac has historically been a really good source. Could be wrong but I’d bet that it very possible.bluegrouse wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:37 pm‘Not so fast’ doesn’t necessarily mean he turned them down if you haven’t been told specifically that he turned them down. Could mean they’re still negotiating and the contract hasn’t been signed.Roy McAvoy wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:27 pmNobody told me. It’s just reading the tea leaves of people with sources saying Harrell is the new coach (meaning they heard he was being offered) and then people with sources saying “no so fast” (meaning he turned it down).Notatrueaggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:23 pmI’m confused??? How do you get multiple people saying he’s the head coach and then say he’s turned down? And who told you this information lmaoLarryTheAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:21 pmThis doesn't surprise me. I heard he turned down washington state last year(not sure if true). Why would he do that then come here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
splintorb
- Posts: 476
- Joined: October 11th, 2014, 7:50 pm
- Has thanked: 246 times
- Been thanked: 125 times
Re: Graham Herrell
It’s people being a little bothered this guy is being a litttttlllleee hypocritical...2004AG wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 10:06 pmI don’t get why everyone is on your (I can't express myself without swearing). I appreciate the info.stang wrote:I'm complaining about Isaac posting false information and passing it off as fact. I'm posting true information, and you can accept it as fact or not, but I thought some on this board may be interested to know it.splintorb wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:57 pmDude! Are you reading your own messages?? You are literally being EXACTLY what you’re complaining about...stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:52 pmWe'll see who ends up being right.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:50 pmI feel like you’re doing exactly what you accuse issac of doing.stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:54 pmIsaac is wrong. Graham Harrell will not be coaching at USU and there are no current negotiations. He wanted so badly to be first that he "reported" recklessly and got hopes up.slcagg wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:49 pmYup exactly. Isaac has historically been a really good source. Could be wrong but I’d bet that it very possible.bluegrouse wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:37 pm‘Not so fast’ doesn’t necessarily mean he turned them down if you haven’t been told specifically that he turned them down. Could mean they’re still negotiating and the contract hasn’t been signed.Roy McAvoy wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:27 pmNobody told me. It’s just reading the tea leaves of people with sources saying Harrell is the new coach (meaning they heard he was being offered) and then people with sources saying “no so fast” (meaning he turned it down).Notatrueaggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:23 pmI’m confused??? How do you get multiple people saying he’s the head coach and then say he’s turned down? And who told you this information lmaoLarryTheAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:21 pmThis doesn't surprise me. I heard he turned down washington state last year(not sure if true). Why would he do that then come here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author splintorb for the post:
- Imakeitrain
-
Imakeitrain
- Posts: 14045
- Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
- Has thanked: 918 times
- Been thanked: 1913 times
Re: Graham Herrell
So the point of you commenting is to boast about “sources”.stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:59 pmHarrell did turn down an offer. I do not work for the AD, but I have very reliable information on this one. Unlike Isaac's sources. And I don't give a damn if you believe me, you'll see.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:56 pmThat wasn’t my point.stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:52 pmWe'll see who ends up being right.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:50 pmI feel like you’re doing exactly what you accuse issac of doing.stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:54 pmIsaac is wrong. Graham Harrell will not be coaching at USU and there are no current negotiations. He wanted so badly to be first that he "reported" recklessly and got hopes up.slcagg wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:49 pmYup exactly. Isaac has historically been a really good source. Could be wrong but I’d bet that it very possible.bluegrouse wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:37 pm‘Not so fast’ doesn’t necessarily mean he turned them down if you haven’t been told specifically that he turned them down. Could mean they’re still negotiating and the contract hasn’t been signed.Roy McAvoy wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:27 pmNobody told me. It’s just reading the tea leaves of people with sources saying Harrell is the new coach (meaning they heard he was being offered) and then people with sources saying “no so fast” (meaning he turned it down).Notatrueaggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:23 pmI’m confused??? How do you get multiple people saying he’s the head coach and then say he’s turned down? And who told you this information lmaoLarryTheAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:21 pmThis doesn't surprise me. I heard he turned down washington state last year(not sure if true). Why would he do that then come here.
You are definitively stating that Harrell turned down an offer.
Either you work for the AD and should be fired because loose lips sink ships or you’re just as full of it and making a prediction. I also predict Harrell won’t coach here. I’m just not pretending I know anything about it.
Issac also has reliable sources. There is 0 chance that the ADs office would report we were turned down or want that info out. It’s embarrassing information. It’s information that puts us in a worse light and in a worse negotiating position with other quality coaches....
But you just had to let everyone on a semi-anonymous know you have “sources”, right?
-
3rdGenAggie
- Pick'em Champ - '16 Kickoff
- Posts: 12404
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 11:53 pm
- Location: The City of the Salty Lake
- Has thanked: 4058 times
- Been thanked: 2367 times
Re: Graham Harrell
My guesses are that Isaac's sources (which are typically good) told him it was Harrell. That then changed.
- These users thanked the author 3rdGenAggie for the post:
- Roy McAvoy
"I have no idea what I'm doing, but I know I'm doing it really, really well." -Andy Dwyer
-
ViAggie
- Posts: 24824
- Joined: June 16th, 2011, 6:49 pm
- Location: Temecula, California
- Has thanked: 6118 times
- Been thanked: 2560 times
Re: Graham Harrell
Maybe3rdGenAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 10:12 pmMy guesses are that Isaac's sources (which are typically good) told him it was Harrell. That then changed.
Just another day in the (Aggie) Brotherhood
-
Aggie84025
- Posts: 9480
- Joined: September 12th, 2018, 2:01 pm
- Has thanked: 2958 times
- Been thanked: 4370 times
Re: Graham Herrell
I would have no problem seeing Choate given the opportunity.MTAG wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:55 pmI’m not gonna lie, that was actually hilariousAggie84025 wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:46 pmWell we know we have Chico to fall back on.all I’m trying to do is build my fan club. This made my night
all I’m trying to do is build my fan club. This made my night -
Imakeitrain
- Posts: 14045
- Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
- Has thanked: 918 times
- Been thanked: 1913 times
Re: Graham Harrell
Only stang has reliable sources.3rdGenAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 10:12 pmMy guesses are that Isaac's sources (which are typically good) told him it was Harrell. That then changed.
- These users thanked the author Imakeitrain for the post:
- splintorb
-
ineptimusprime
- Posts: 7799
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:07 pm
- Has thanked: 406 times
- Been thanked: 4819 times
Re: Graham Harrell
I appreciate both stang and Isaac sharing what they are hearing. I don’t care if they end up being wrong. This is Twitter and USUfans.com we are talking about. I’m not expecting perfection from anyone.
Last edited by ineptimusprime on December 4th, 2020, 10:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- These users thanked the author ineptimusprime for the post (total 4):
- splintorb • cdaAg • BLUERUFiO • AggieBlues
-
flying_scotsman2.0
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: January 23rd, 2018, 12:29 pm
- Location: The Mighty City-State of Roy, Utah
- Has thanked: 5836 times
- Been thanked: 2208 times
Re: Graham Herrell
Why does Isaac get a pass?ineptimusprime wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 8:37 pmEveryone needs to give Isaac a pass on this one. Sounds like the only thing he got wrong is Harrell being a self-serving douchebag. Had every reason to think it was a done deal but for Harrell’s apparent bad faith.
And if nothing else, I think I’ve figured out who YBA is on Twitter.
Why does Premasunac get a pass?
-
USU78
- Pick'em Champ - '16 Weekly
- Posts: 15409
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 6:43 am
- Location: Sandy
- Has thanked: 7168 times
- Been thanked: 2087 times
Re: Graham Harrell
Doesn't anybody remember The Project? Everybody had a source. Everybody knew somebody.
And everybody's information was as good as USU had. Problem was, USU didn't exactly have good information.
It's axiomatic that you can only know what's knowable. What's in Harrell's head isn't knowable.
And everybody's information was as good as USU had. Problem was, USU didn't exactly have good information.
It's axiomatic that you can only know what's knowable. What's in Harrell's head isn't knowable.
- These users thanked the author USU78 for the post (total 4):
- cdaAg • ineptimusprime • JFW_AGGIES • BLUERUFiO
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Re: Graham Harrell
Bingo! I'm glad they are sharing their info. So many people have been complaining about there not being any info and now that we have two sources with differing opinions some are blowing up. At least some of us are enjoying the fact that two insiders are sharing what there sources have told them. I don't care if one of them is wrong. I guarantee that their sources are much closer to the situation than I'll ever have access to.ineptimusprime wrote:I appreciate both stang and Isaac sharing what they are hearing. I don’t care if they end up being wrong. This is Twitter and USUfans.com we are talking about. I’m not expecting perfection from anyone.
Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author smallz for the post (total 2):
- Roy McAvoy • cdaAg
-
Roy McAvoy
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: November 2nd, 2011, 1:30 pm
- Has thanked: 1196 times
- Been thanked: 2975 times
Re: Graham Harrell
I, too, am grateful for Isaac’s work to get info out and for Stang anonymously coming here and setting the record straight. Again, it seems easy to piece together what happened here.
We’re message board fans. We love all the speculation, scoop, and over analyzing. That’s why we’re here.
We’re message board fans. We love all the speculation, scoop, and over analyzing. That’s why we’re here.
- These users thanked the author Roy McAvoy for the post (total 2):
- cdaAg • BLUERUFiO
-
Aggie84025
- Posts: 9480
- Joined: September 12th, 2018, 2:01 pm
- Has thanked: 2958 times
- Been thanked: 4370 times
Re: Graham Harrell
So since Harrell seems like a no go who are some candidates that we are considering? I know some people on here know. I don't have a twitter, Instagram or facebook account so you know I won't be breaking any news.
Re: Graham Herrell
I'm done running around in circles on this. The point of me commenting was to stop the spread of misinformation that Isaac started by jumping to conclusions. That's all. None of you know who I am, so why would I care if you view me as reliable or as someone with sources.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 10:11 pmSo the point of you commenting is to boast about “sources”.stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:59 pmHarrell did turn down an offer. I do not work for the AD, but I have very reliable information on this one. Unlike Isaac's sources. And I don't give a damn if you believe me, you'll see.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:56 pmThat wasn’t my point.stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:52 pmWe'll see who ends up being right.Imakeitrain wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:50 pmI feel like you’re doing exactly what you accuse issac of doing.stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:54 pmIsaac is wrong. Graham Harrell will not be coaching at USU and there are no current negotiations. He wanted so badly to be first that he "reported" recklessly and got hopes up.slcagg wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:49 pmYup exactly. Isaac has historically been a really good source. Could be wrong but I’d bet that it very possible.bluegrouse wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:37 pm‘Not so fast’ doesn’t necessarily mean he turned them down if you haven’t been told specifically that he turned them down. Could mean they’re still negotiating and the contract hasn’t been signed.Roy McAvoy wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:27 pmNobody told me. It’s just reading the tea leaves of people with sources saying Harrell is the new coach (meaning they heard he was being offered) and then people with sources saying “no so fast” (meaning he turned it down).Notatrueaggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:23 pmI’m confused??? How do you get multiple people saying he’s the head coach and then say he’s turned down? And who told you this information lmaoLarryTheAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:21 pmThis doesn't surprise me. I heard he turned down washington state last year(not sure if true). Why would he do that then come here.
You are definitively stating that Harrell turned down an offer.
Either you work for the AD and should be fired because loose lips sink ships or you’re just as full of it and making a prediction. I also predict Harrell won’t coach here. I’m just not pretending I know anything about it.
Issac also has reliable sources. There is 0 chance that the ADs office would report we were turned down or want that info out. It’s embarrassing information. It’s information that puts us in a worse light and in a worse negotiating position with other quality coaches....
But you just had to let everyone on a semi-anonymous know you have “sources”, right?
Again, he made a mistake. He's not a bad person for it, but he stated that Harrell will be the next head coach and that it's a done deal. I'm simply telling everyone not to get their hopes up on that, because the exact opposite is true.
-
flying_scotsman2.0
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: January 23rd, 2018, 12:29 pm
- Location: The Mighty City-State of Roy, Utah
- Has thanked: 5836 times
- Been thanked: 2208 times
Re: Graham Harrell
I didn’t want Harrell anyway. I want a real salt of the earth type of coach who will come in and teach the players how to tackle and read a pitch.
- These users thanked the author flying_scotsman2.0 for the post:
- AggieBlues
-
Imakeitrain
- Posts: 14045
- Joined: March 11th, 2011, 9:12 pm
- Has thanked: 918 times
- Been thanked: 1913 times
Re: Graham Harrell
Information is one thing. But stang was the one complaining about issac propping himself up with “sources”, when he himself then referenced sources.
It’s even worse that stang’s info is embarrassing. It suggests that Hartwell is so incapable of recruitment and due diligence he offered the job to someone that wasn’t even interested in coming here.
It’s even worse that stang’s info is embarrassing. It suggests that Hartwell is so incapable of recruitment and due diligence he offered the job to someone that wasn’t even interested in coming here.
Re: Graham Harrell
I hope my posts haven't come across as me trying to personally attack Isaac. I don't know him.
It just rubbed me the wrong way that he jumped the gun on this matter and stated it as a fact in a way that not only got Aggie fans' hopes up, but could also potentially do damage to the program as word gets out that Harrell was in fact offered and turned the offer down. That's a bad look, and something other candidates may take notice of.
It just rubbed me the wrong way that he jumped the gun on this matter and stated it as a fact in a way that not only got Aggie fans' hopes up, but could also potentially do damage to the program as word gets out that Harrell was in fact offered and turned the offer down. That's a bad look, and something other candidates may take notice of.
-
Roy McAvoy
- Posts: 7556
- Joined: November 2nd, 2011, 1:30 pm
- Has thanked: 1196 times
- Been thanked: 2975 times
Re: Graham Harrell
Yeah, I tend to agree with you here. I wish it would’ve just reported that Harrell was a front runner candidate and left at that.stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 10:32 pmI hope my posts haven't come across as me trying to personally attack Isaac. I don't know him.
It just rubbed me the wrong way that he jumped the gun on this matter and stated it as a fact in a way that not only got Aggie fans' hopes up, but could also potentially do damage to the program as word gets out that Harrell was in fact offered and turned the offer down. That's a bad look, and something other candidates may take notice of.
- These users thanked the author Roy McAvoy for the post:
- 3rdGenAggie
-
Aggie formerly in Hawaii
- Posts: 8054
- Joined: October 22nd, 2016, 1:06 am
- Has thanked: 2309 times
- Been thanked: 2588 times
Re: Graham Harrell
Yeah he should not have posted that. If he wanted to say "it is likely Harrell gets the job",ok, but to go all in when he didnt fully know misled a fanbase.stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 10:32 pmI hope my posts haven't come across as me trying to personally attack Isaac. I don't know him.
It just rubbed me the wrong way that he jumped the gun on this matter and stated it as a fact in a way that not only got Aggie fans' hopes up, but could also potentially do damage to the program as word gets out that Harrell was in fact offered and turned the offer down. That's a bad look, and something other candidates may take notice of.
-
Intermeddler
- Posts: 3010
- Joined: January 20th, 2011, 7:35 pm
- Location: North Salt Lake
- Has thanked: 767 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
-
2004AG
- Posts: 12423
- Joined: November 16th, 2010, 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 798 times
- Been thanked: 1601 times
Re: Graham Harrell
Is Issac sticking to his guns that it will be Harrell, or has he back tracked ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Aggie84025
- Posts: 9480
- Joined: September 12th, 2018, 2:01 pm
- Has thanked: 2958 times
- Been thanked: 4370 times
-
QuackAttackAggie
- Pick'em Champ - '12, '22 Bowl; '15, '17 Weekly; '18 BB Predict the Score; '22 Kickoff
- Posts: 18232
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:08 pm
- Location: Sonora, MX
- Has thanked: 310 times
- Been thanked: 2958 times
Re: Graham Harrell
He deleted the tweets it looks like.2004AG wrote:Is Issac sticking to his guns that it will be Harrell, or has he back tracked ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Aggie formerly in Hawaii
- Posts: 8054
- Joined: October 22nd, 2016, 1:06 am
- Has thanked: 2309 times
- Been thanked: 2588 times
Re: Graham Harrell
I am getting bad flashbacks to 2015. Hope it just paranoia and nothing else.Aggie84025 wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 10:51 pmWhen is the press conference for Chico or Maile going to happen?
Re: Graham Harrell
Relax! There’s a lot of other very good candidates out there still that we won’t have to hire one of those two. Even if we have to get an FCS coach, which I think a lot of us are in favor of, we will get somebody good, I guarantee it!Aggie formerly in Hawaii wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 10:58 pmI am getting bad flashbacks to 2015. Hope it just paranoia and nothing else.Aggie84025 wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 10:51 pmWhen is the press conference for Chico or Maile going to happen?
-
TheAKAggie
- DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING I SAY
- Posts: 6360
- Joined: February 3rd, 2012, 10:21 pm
- Location: Hyde Park, UT
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 592 times
- Contact:
Re: Graham Harrell
You know what you did.stang wrote:What?TheAKAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:30 pmBecause he's on twitter calling him fake news.MTAG wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:55 pmAnd you know this how?stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:54 pmIsaac is wrong. Graham Harrell will not be coaching at USU and there are no current negotiations. He wanted so badly to be first that he "reported" recklessly and got hopes up.slcagg wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:49 pmYup exactly. Isaac has historically been a really good source. Could be wrong but I’d bet that it very possible.bluegrouse wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:37 pm‘Not so fast’ doesn’t necessarily mean he turned them down if you haven’t been told specifically that he turned them down. Could mean they’re still negotiating and the contract hasn’t been signed.Roy McAvoy wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:27 pmNobody told me. It’s just reading the tea leaves of people with sources saying Harrell is the new coach (meaning they heard he was being offered) and then people with sources saying “no so fast” (meaning he turned it down).Notatrueaggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:23 pmI’m confused??? How do you get multiple people saying he’s the head coach and then say he’s turned down? And who told you this information lmaoLarryTheAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:21 pmThis doesn't surprise me. I heard he turned down washington state last year(not sure if true). Why would he do that then come here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author TheAKAggie for the post:
- AggieArmy
Hail Aggies!
Re: Graham Harrell
I don't, please elaborate.TheAKAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 11:25 pmYou know what you did.stang wrote:What?TheAKAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:30 pmBecause he's on twitter calling him fake news.MTAG wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:55 pmAnd you know this how?stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:54 pmIsaac is wrong. Graham Harrell will not be coaching at USU and there are no current negotiations. He wanted so badly to be first that he "reported" recklessly and got hopes up.slcagg wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:49 pmYup exactly. Isaac has historically been a really good source. Could be wrong but I’d bet that it very possible.bluegrouse wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:37 pm‘Not so fast’ doesn’t necessarily mean he turned them down if you haven’t been told specifically that he turned them down. Could mean they’re still negotiating and the contract hasn’t been signed.Roy McAvoy wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:27 pmNobody told me. It’s just reading the tea leaves of people with sources saying Harrell is the new coach (meaning they heard he was being offered) and then people with sources saying “no so fast” (meaning he turned it down).Notatrueaggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:23 pmI’m confused??? How do you get multiple people saying he’s the head coach and then say he’s turned down? And who told you this information lmaoLarryTheAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:21 pmThis doesn't surprise me. I heard he turned down washington state last year(not sure if true). Why would he do that then come here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
ineptimusprime
- Posts: 7799
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 12:07 pm
- Has thanked: 406 times
- Been thanked: 4819 times
Re: Graham Harrell
You are guilty of the crime of forgetting to check the username.stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 11:39 pmI don't, please elaborate.TheAKAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 11:25 pmYou know what you did.stang wrote:What?TheAKAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:30 pmBecause he's on twitter calling him fake news.MTAG wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:55 pmAnd you know this how?stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:54 pmIsaac is wrong. Graham Harrell will not be coaching at USU and there are no current negotiations. He wanted so badly to be first that he "reported" recklessly and got hopes up.slcagg wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:49 pmYup exactly. Isaac has historically been a really good source. Could be wrong but I’d bet that it very possible.bluegrouse wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:37 pm‘Not so fast’ doesn’t necessarily mean he turned them down if you haven’t been told specifically that he turned them down. Could mean they’re still negotiating and the contract hasn’t been signed.Roy McAvoy wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:27 pmNobody told me. It’s just reading the tea leaves of people with sources saying Harrell is the new coach (meaning they heard he was being offered) and then people with sources saying “no so fast” (meaning he turned it down).Notatrueaggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:23 pmI’m confused??? How do you get multiple people saying he’s the head coach and then say he’s turned down? And who told you this information lmaoLarryTheAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:21 pmThis doesn't surprise me. I heard he turned down washington state last year(not sure if true). Why would he do that then come here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author ineptimusprime for the post:
- bluegrouse
Re: Graham Harrell
Ahhh, right you areineptimusprime wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 11:40 pmYou are guilty of the crime of forgetting to check the username.stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 11:39 pmI don't, please elaborate.TheAKAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 11:25 pmYou know what you did.stang wrote:What?TheAKAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 9:30 pmBecause he's on twitter calling him fake news.MTAG wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:55 pmAnd you know this how?stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:54 pmIsaac is wrong. Graham Harrell will not be coaching at USU and there are no current negotiations. He wanted so badly to be first that he "reported" recklessly and got hopes up.slcagg wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:49 pmYup exactly. Isaac has historically been a really good source. Could be wrong but I’d bet that it very possible.bluegrouse wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:37 pm‘Not so fast’ doesn’t necessarily mean he turned them down if you haven’t been told specifically that he turned them down. Could mean they’re still negotiating and the contract hasn’t been signed.Roy McAvoy wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:27 pmNobody told me. It’s just reading the tea leaves of people with sources saying Harrell is the new coach (meaning they heard he was being offered) and then people with sources saying “no so fast” (meaning he turned it down).Notatrueaggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:23 pmI’m confused??? How do you get multiple people saying he’s the head coach and then say he’s turned down? And who told you this information lmaoLarryTheAggie wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 7:21 pmThis doesn't surprise me. I heard he turned down washington state last year(not sure if true). Why would he do that then come here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
JFW_AGGIES
- Posts: 735
- Joined: September 2nd, 2017, 6:02 am
- Has thanked: 56 times
- Been thanked: 155 times
Re: Graham Harrell
This is how it should have been phrased, then no one comes out with mudd on their face. I like info but if your getting it from the interwebs buyer be ware. Anyways can't wait to find out who our new coach will be in the next week or so. Go AGGIES!!!Roy McAvoy wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 10:35 pmYeah, I tend to agree with you here. I wish it would’ve just reported that Harrell was a front runner candidate and left at that.stang wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 10:32 pmI hope my posts haven't come across as me trying to personally attack Isaac. I don't know him.
It just rubbed me the wrong way that he jumped the gun on this matter and stated it as a fact in a way that not only got Aggie fans' hopes up, but could also potentially do damage to the program as word gets out that Harrell was in fact offered and turned the offer down. That's a bad look, and something other candidates may take notice of.
-
slcagg
- Posts: 14250
- Joined: December 15th, 2010, 6:29 pm
- Has thanked: 4437 times
- Been thanked: 4077 times
Re: Graham Harrell
Bring on choate. I wonder if he has been interviewed.MTAG wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 11:13 pmRelax! There’s a lot of other very good candidates out there still that we won’t have to hire one of those two. Even if we have to get an FCS coach, which I think a lot of us are in favor of, we will get somebody good, I guarantee it!Aggie formerly in Hawaii wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 10:58 pmI am getting bad flashbacks to 2015. Hope it just paranoia and nothing else.Aggie84025 wrote: ↑December 4th, 2020, 10:51 pmWhen is the press conference for Chico or Maile going to happen?
-
brownjeans
- Flatulent
- Posts: 18612
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 951 times
- Been thanked: 1739 times
Re: Graham Harrell
This idiotic thread is why so much effort is made to keep the process and candidates private.
- These users thanked the author brownjeans for the post (total 4):
- LarryTheAggie • USU78 • BustaMcNutt • 3rdGenAggie
-
slcagg
- Posts: 14250
- Joined: December 15th, 2010, 6:29 pm
- Has thanked: 4437 times
- Been thanked: 4077 times
Re: Graham Harrell
You want to go back to the Canales thread insteadbrownjeans wrote: ↑December 5th, 2020, 5:53 amThis idiotic thread is why so much effort is made to keep the process and candidates private.
?- These users thanked the author slcagg for the post:
- brownjeans
-
brownjeans
- Flatulent
- Posts: 18612
- Joined: November 3rd, 2010, 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 951 times
- Been thanked: 1739 times
Re: Graham Harrell
All this speculation tips the job to Canales.slcagg wrote: ↑December 5th, 2020, 5:56 amYou want to go back to the Canales thread insteadbrownjeans wrote: ↑December 5th, 2020, 5:53 amThis idiotic thread is why so much effort is made to keep the process and candidates private.?
- These users thanked the author brownjeans for the post (total 3):
- slcagg • USU78 • AggieBlues